H.G. Alt, M. Jung / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 568 (1998) 87–112
111
To determine the crystallinity degree, h, the relation-
solution, an aliquot containing ca. 1 mg catalyst was
removed and used for polymerization. These solutions
were used for polymerization within 60 min after
preparation.
ship h=DHm/DH° was selected. DHm is derived from
m
the data of the second heating course of the DSC. The
fusion enthalpy for 100% crystalline polyethylene was
assumed as 290 J g−1 [31].
3.9.2. Polymerization of ethylene
3.10.2. Viscosimetry
A 1 l Bu¨chi laboratory autoclave BEP 280 was filled
with 500 ml pentane, 7 ml MAO (30% in toluene) and
the corresponding amount of catalyst solution ([Zr]:[Al]
1:17000). The reactor was thermostated at 60°C, and a
constant ethylene pressure of 10 bar was applied. The
polymerization was terminated after 1 h by venting the
ethylene.
The intrinsic viscosity was determined using an Ub-
belohde precision capillary viscometer in cis/trans de-
calin at 13590.1°C. Prior to the measurements, the
samples were weighed into sealable small flasks and
dissolved in an exactly measured amount of decalin at
140–150°C over a period of 3–4 h. Calibration curves
were available for the determination of Mp. Every
polymer sample was weighed and measured twice to
reduce the error.
3.9.3. Polymerization of propylene
A total of 500 ml propylene (‘polymerization grade’)
was condensed into the reactor, stirred for 20 min with
5 ml MAO (30% in toluene) at 20°C and then cooled to
−5°C. The prepared catalyst solution (toluene/
MAO=10:1) was pressed into the cooled stirring vessel
with 6.5 bar argon pressure from a burette. The reactor
temperature was increased to 60°C within 15 min. Then
the polymerization was conducted at ca. 25 bar propy-
lene pressure and terminated after 1 h by releasing the
unreacted propylene.
Acknowledgements
We thank Phillips Petroleum Company (Bartlesville,
OK, USA) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
for their financial support and Witco company for a
donation of methylaluminoxane.
References
3.10. Characterization of the polymer samples
[1] J.A. Ewen, R.L. Jones, A. Razavi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110 (1988)
6255.
[2] (a) H.-H. Brintzinger, D. Fischer, R. Mu¨lhaupt, B. Rieger, R.
Waymouth, Angew. Chem. 107 (1995) 1255. (b) H.-H.
Brintzinger, D. Fischer, R. Mu¨lhaupt, B. Rieger, R. Waymouth,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34 (1995) 1143.
[3] M. Aulbach, F. Ku¨ber, Chemie in Unserer Zeit 4 (1994) 197.
[4] W. Kaminsky, M. Arnd, Adv. Polym. Sci. 127 (1997) 143.
[5] H.G. Alt, R. Zenk, J. Organomet. Chem. 514 (1996) 257.
[6] H.G. Alt, R. Zenk, J. Organomet. Chem. 518 (1996) 7.
[7] H.G. Alt, R. Zenk, J. Organomet. Chem. 522 (1996) 33.
[8] K. Patsidis, H.G. Alt, W. Milius, S.J. Palackal, J. Organomet.
Chem. 509 (1996) 63.
[9] J.A. Ewen, M.J. Elder, R.L. Jones, et al., Macromol. Chem.
Macromol. Symp. 48/49 (1991) 253.
[10] A. Razavi, J.L. Atwood, J. Organomet. Chem. 497 (1995) 105.
[11] A. Razavi, L. Peters, L. Nafpliotis, et al., Macromol. Symp. 89
(1995) 345.
[12] A. Razavi, J.L. Atwood, J. Organomet. Chem. 520 (1996) 115.
[13] A. Razavi, J. Ferrara, J. Organomet. Chem. 435 (1992) 299.
[14] (a) A. Winter, J. Rohrmann, M. Antberg, V. Dolle, W. Spaleck,
Ger. Offen. (1991) GE 3, 907, 965. (b) A. Winter, J. Rohrmann,
M. Antberg, V. Dolle, W. Spaleck, Chem. Abstr. 114 (1991)
165103w.
3.10.1. Differential scanning calorimetry
A Perkin Elmer calorimeter DSC-7 was available to
measure the thermal properties of the polymer samples.
Prior to the measurements, the polymer samples were
dried in vacuo. To determine the fusion enthalpies of
the polyethylenes and polypropylenes, 3–5 mg of each
of the polymers were fused into standard aluminum
pans and measured using the following temperature
program: first heating phase (20 K min−1) from 50 to
200°C, cooling phase (−20 K min−1) to 50°C, second
heating phase (20 K min−1) from 50 to 200°C, secondly
the cooling phase (−20 K min−1) to 50°C. The tem-
perature was linearly corrected relative to indium (m.p.
156.6°C); the fusion enthalpy of indium (DHm=28.45 J
g
−1) was used for calibration. The maximum of the
melting temperatures during the second heating run
was selected for the polyethylenes; for the polypropyle-
nes, the minimum of the crystallization peak during the
second cooling phase.
To determine the glass transition enthalpies of the
polypropylene samples, 30–50 mg of the polymer were
fused into standard aluminum pans and measured using
the following temperature program: first heating phase
(20 K min−1) from −40 to 40°C, cooling phase (−20
K min−1) to −40°C, second heating phase (20 K
min−1) from −40 to 40°C, 2nd cooling phase to
−40°C.
[15] H.G. Alt, R. Zenk, J. Organomet. Chem. 514 (1996) 113.
[16] H.G. Alt, S.J. Palackal, J. Organomet. Chem. 472 (1994) 113.
[17] M. Antberg, V. Dolle, R. Klein, J. Rohrmann, W. Spaleck, A.
Winter, in: T. Keii, K. Soga (Eds.), Catalytic Olefin Polymeriza-
tion, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Recent
Developments in Olefin Polymerization Catalysts, Tokyo, 1989,
Kodansha (1990) 501.
[18] B. Peifer, W. Milius, H.G. Alt, J. Organomet. Chem. 553 (1998)
205.