Table 2 Asymmetric palladium catalyzed allylic substitution with different
ligands
Table 3 Asymmetric palladium catalyzed allylic substitution with 3 and 9
Conditionb t/h Yield (%) Ee (%)c
Entry Ligand
Reaction
condition t/h
Entry Ligand
Yield (%)a Ee (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
9aa
3b
A'
A
B'
B
B'
B
36
2
36
3
96
12
91
98
96
98
92
98
78
84.0
90
89.4
96
98.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3a
3a
3b
3b
3c
3c
3d
3d
3e
3e
4
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
B
B
1
3
2
3
2
3
2
5
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
98
73.9 (S)
81.9 (S)
84.0 (S)
89.4(S)
83.9 (S)
89.9 (S)
81.1 (S)
87.8 (S)
95.6(S)
98.0 (S)
75.3 (S)
90.4 (S)
9aa
3b
9ba
3e
O
a
N
R
b
3
9a: R = i-Pr; 9b: R = t-Bu. Condition A': [Pd(h -
SPh
12
10
3
C3H5)Cl]2 (2.5 mol%), 9 (10 mol%), NaCH(CO2Me)2, THF, 20 °C.
Condition B': [Pd(h -C3H5)Cl]2 (2.5 mol%), 9 (10 mol%), KOAc (3 mol%),
BSA, CH2(CO2Me)2,CH2Cl2, 20 °C. Absolute configuration of product
3
10
11
12
c
5
3
was S for all cases.
a Isolated yield based on the 1,3-diphenylprop-2-enyl acetate. b Determined
c
by HPLC (chiralcel OJ column). Absolute configuration of product was
assigned through comparison of the sign of specific rotations with the
literautre data.10
5 achieved only a little higher ee than ligand 3b (90.4% entry 12
vs. 89.4% entry 4 in Table 2); the planar chirality matched the
central chirality in 5 for the oxazoline ring whereas they are
mismatched in ligand 3. The ee obtained with ligand 8 was low
but did have an influence in this asymmetric allylic substitution
reaction. Furthermore, it is noteworthy to compare the reaction
rate of the reaction catalyzed by 3 with the counterpart of the
thioether of phenyloxazoline 9 (Table 3). For all the reactions
catalyzed by 9, the rates are much slower than those of the
ferrocene derivatives.12
smoothly, while the bulkier trimethylsilyl group may decrease
the enantioselectivity of the product.
Compared with the palladium complexes of chiral thioethers
of phenyloxazoline ligands reported by Williams,3a the palla-
dium complexes with chiral thioethers of ferrocenyl–oxazolines
are more efficient. The allylic substitution reaction catalyzed by
the latter under our conditions is much faster and gives almost
quantitative yields.
In order to investigate the effect of planar chirality on the
absolute configuration and enantioselectivity of this reaction,
diastereoisomer 5 was also synthesized, and subjected to
palladium catalyzed allylic substitution. Under essentially
similar conditions (condition B), a similar enantioselectivity
(89.4% in entry 4 vs. 90.4% in entry 12, Table 2) and the same
absolute configuration was obtained. It seems that the absolute
configuration is governed mainly by the central chirality of the
oxazoline ring. (It seems that planar chirality plays a much less
important role in palladium catalyzed allylic substitution.) This
phenomenon was also found in our previous work on ruthe-
nium-catalyzed asymmetric transfer hydrogenation with ferro-
cene derived catalysts.6
In order to further clarify the role of the planar chirality in this
reaction, we may remove the central chirality on the oxazoline
ring. For this purpose, the single planar chiral thioether of
ferrocenyl-oxazoline (8) was designed and synthesized11
(Scheme 3). Ligand 8 was subjected to palladium catalyzed
allylic substitution under essential similar conditions as above
(condition B) but only 8.5% ee was obtained and the absolute
configuration is R. This result can explain why diastereosiomer
Financial support from the National Foundation of China
(29790127) and Chinese Academy of Sciences is gratefully
acknowledged.
Notes and references
1 Reviews: C. G. Frost, J. Howarth and J. M. J. Williams, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 1992, 3, 1089; B. M. Trost and D. L. Van Vranken, Chem.
Rev., 1996, 96, 395; G. Consiglio and R. M. Waymouth, Chem. Rev.,
1989, 89, 257; S. A. Godleski, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, ed.
B. H. Trost, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991, vol. 4, p. 585.
2 Recent examples: B. M. Trost and R. C. Bunt, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl, 1996, 35, 99; B. M. Trost and F. D. Toste, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1998, 120, 815; B. M. Trost and D. E. Patterson, J. Org. Chem., 1998,
63, 1339.
3 (a) G. J. Dawson, C. G. Frost, C. J. Martin and J. M. J. Williams,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 7793; (b) J. V. Allen, J. F. Bower and
J. M. J. Williams, Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 1994, 5, 1895; (c) J. V.
Allen, S. J. Coote, G. J. Dawson, C. G. Frost, C. J. Martin and J. M. J.
Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1994, 2065; (d) K. Boog-
wick, P. S. Pregosin and G. Trabesinger, Organometallics, 1998, 17,
3254 (e) B. Koning, A. Meetsma and R. M. Kellogg, J. Org. Chem.,
1998, 63, 5533, and references therein.
4 J. C. Ruble, J. Tweddell and G. C. Fu, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 2794;
S. Qiao and G. C. Fu, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 4168.
5 A. H. Li, L. X. Dai, X. L. Hou, Y. Z. Huang and F. W. Li, J. Org. Chem.,
1996, 61, 489; A. H. Li, Y. G. Zhou, L. X. Dai, X. L. Hou, L. J. Xia and
L. Lin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 1317.
6 X.-D. Du, L.-X. Dai, X.-L. Hou, L.-J. Xia and M.-H. Tang, Chin.
J. Chem., 1998, 16, 90.
7 K. H. Ahn, C.-W. Cho, H.-H. Beak, J. Park and S. Lee, J. Org. Chem.,
1996, 61, 4937.
8 C. J. Richards, T. Damalidia, D. E. Habbis and M. B. Hursthouse,
Synlett., 1995, 74.
9 P. J. Graham, R. V. Lindsey, G. W. Parshall, M. L. Peterson and G. M.
Whitman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1957, 79, 3416.
10 P. Wimmer and M. Widhalm, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1995, 6, 657.
11 A. M. Warshawsky and A. I. Meyers, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112,
8090; T. D. Nelson and A. I. Meyers, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 2655;
W. B. Zhang, T. Kido, Y. Nakatsuji and I. Ikeda, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1996, 37, 7995.
12 We also noticed a similar rate enhancing effect in the asymmetric
transfer hydrogenation of ketones catalyzed by ruthenium complexes
with phosphinoferrocenyloxozolines (ref. 6).
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: a, (1) TFA, H2O, Na2SO4, THF; (2)
Ac2O, Py, CH2Cl2, 88%; b, (1) 2.5 M NaOH (aq), THF, 55 °C (2) H3O+,
85%; c, (1) (ClCO)2, NH2(CH2)2OH, Et3N, CH2Cl2, (2) TsCl, Et3N,
DMAP, CH2Cl2, 63%.
Communication 8/08267G
2766
Chem. Commun., 1998, 2765–2766