250
P. Leoni et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 284 (1999) 246±251
of the counterion, (f) by nothing, the complex remain-
ing unsaturated as cation (2) itself [23]. The unsymme-
trical disposition of the PPh3 molecules makes the ®rst
hypothesis unlikely and points (b) and (c) are ruled out
by the observation that the same resonances appear under an
argon atmosphere and in different solvents (acetone-d6 or
CDCl3). Points (d) and (e) are less readily addressed,
especially if the equilibria are shifted toward the uncoor-
dinated species, due to possible NMR line broadening.
However, we had no signi®cant evidences for aryl or
(2)
1
BF4 coordination even by running 19F, H, or 31P NMR
spectra at 808C and, for the time being, we propose that
(10)BF4 is a monocarbonyl bisphosphine species with a
structure, as illustrated, similar to that of complex 2
(Scheme 2).
In conclusion, we have reported here the ®rst phosphido-
bridged dinuclear complexes containing nitrogen donors as
terminal ligands. Compared to secondary or tertiary alkyl
and aryl phosphines, or alkyl phosphites, the pyridine
molecules exhibit a higher lability, rendering complex
(5b)BF4 a promising reagent which easily furnishes the
26 e fragment Pd2(m-PBut2)(PPh3)2, with two adjacent
unsaturated palladium centers.
Attempted isolation of pure (10)BF4 as a solid failed and
always yielded complex mixtures.
Acknowledgements
The preparation of mono-phosphido-bridged dipalla-
dium(I) dicarbonyls, like complex (9)BF4 is not straightfor-
ward and deserves a brief comment.
Financial support from the Ministero della Ricerca
Scienti®ca e Tecnologica (MURST) and the Consiglio
Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR, Rome) is gratefully
acknowledged.
We have previously shown that the carbonylation of type
(3) (P PCy2H, PMe3, P(OMe)3, P(OEt)3) or (2)
(P PPh3) cations invariably yields a monocarbonyl deri-
vative still containing three terminal P-ligands as shown in
Eq. (1).
References
[1] C.F.J. Bernard, M.J. Russel, in: G. Wilkinson, R.D. Gillard, J.A.
McCleverty (Eds.), Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry, vol. 5,
Pergamon, 1992, p. 1099.
[2] A.J. Canty, H. Jin, A.S. Roberts, B.W. Skelton, P.R. Traill, A.H.
White, Organometallics 14 (1995) 199.
[3] R. van Asselt, E. Rijnberg, C.J. Elsevier, Organometallics 13 (1994)
706.
[4] A.N. Vedernikov, A.I. Kuramshin, B.N. Solomonov, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 121 (1994).
(1)
[5] W. Klaui, M. Glaum, T. Wagner, M.A. Bennett, J. Organomet. Chem.
472 (1994) 355.
A unique exception to this general trend is found in the
carbonylation of (1)BF4 (Eq. (2)). In that case the formation
of a dicarbonyl derivative is most likely due to the large
steric congestion around the monocarbonyl which is prob-
ably formed as an intermediate, but which is so reactive
that it cannot be isolated or even observed (by 31P NMR)
in the early steps of the reaction [26]. A small reduction
of the bulkiness of the phosphorus ligands stabilizes the
monocarbonyl derivative and prevents further carbonyla-
tion; for example, PCy2H and PBut2H have similar cone
angles but the former can reduce its encumbrance by
stacking the cyclohexyl rings and [Pd2(m-PBut2)(PCy2H)3-
(CO)]BF4 can be isolated and does not react further with
CO [25].
[6] M. Catellani, G.P. Chiusoli, Gazz. Chim. Ital. 123 (1993) 1.
[7] P.L. Alsters, P.F. Engel, M.P. Hogerheide, M. Copijn, A.L. Spek, G.
van Koten, Organometallics 12 (1993) 1831.
[8] T. Ukai, H. Kawazura, Y. Ishii, J.J. Bonnet, J.A. Ibers, J. Organomet.
Chem. 65 (1974) 253.
[9] R.A. Klein, F. Hartl, C.J. Elsevier, Organometallics 16 (1997)
1284.
[10] Y. Ishii, S. Hasegawa, S. Kimura, K. Itoh, J. Organomet. Chem. 73
(1974) 411.
[11] J.H. Groen, C.J. Elsevier, K. Vrieze, W.J.J. Smeets, A.L. Spek,
Organometallics 15 (1996) 3445.
[12] R. van Asselt, C.J. Elsevier, Organometallics 11 (1992) 1999.
[13] R. van Asselt, C.J. Elsevier, W.J.J. Smeets, A.L. Spek, Inorg. Chem.
33 (1994) 1521.
[14] R. van Asselt, E.E.C.G. Gielen, R.E. RuÈlke, K. Vrieze, C.J. Elsevier,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116 (1994) 977.