Figure 1A are not on the same scale; the molar absorption
coefficient of radical cation 4 is ∼1 order of magnitude
greater than that of 3.
of a solution of 2 in acetonitrile and one of water/acetonitrile
(or water only) via syringe pumps immediately before the
LFP experiments were performed, and the kinetics in aqueous
acetonitrile solutions were obtained only at ambient tem-
peratures. Table 1 lists rate constants for reactions of 1 in
various solvents at ambient temperature.
Time-resolved UV growth spectra from reactions of radical
1 were obtained in THF and acetonitrile. The spectra were
produced by subtracting a short time spectrum from those
obtained at later times which removes the features present
immediately after photolysis. Positive signals are from
species forming with time, and negative signals are from
decaying species. The spectrum in THF (Figure 1B)5 shows
the growth of benzylic radical 3 and decay of the pyridine-
2-thiyl radical; no signal from radical cation 4 is apparent.
In acetonitrile solution, however, a strong signal from radical
cation 4 grew in (Figure 1C), and comparison of the 300-
320-nm regions in parts A and C of Figure 1 indicates that
benzylic radical 3 also was formed in acetonitrile. We
calculate an ∼35% yield of radical cation 4 from reaction
of 1 in CH3CN from a comparison of the ultimate intensity
of the 390-nm signal from the radical cation against the
instantaneous intensity of the 490-nm signal from pyridine-
2-thiyl and the known and measured extinction coefficients
of the two radicals.15
Table 1. Kinetics of Reactions of Radical 1 at (22 ( 2) °C
solvent
% 4a
k (s-1
)
THF
butanoneb
CH3CN
5% waterc
10% waterc
50% waterc
0
25
35
95
100d
100d
8 × 104
1.2 × 106
1.2 × 106
7 × 106
1.7 × 107
8 × 107
a Percentage of product 4 estimated from the ratio of the ultimate intensity
of the 390 nm signal from 4 to that of the pyridine-2-thiyl radical at 490
nm using the extinction coefficients in ref 15. b Despite drying, this solvent
might have contained some water as deduced from the apparent hydrolysis
of the PTOC ester upon standing. c Volume percent of water in water/
acetonitrile. d No signal was observed at 320 nm from radical 3.
Radical 1 reacted rapidly in aqueous acetonitrile solutions,
precluding useful growth spectra, but Figure 1D shows the
time-resolved decay spectrum of radical cation 4 produced
from reaction of 1 in a 10% water solution. Radical cation
4 appears to be the only product formed in the aqueous
acetonitrile reactions on the basis of the small 320-nm signal
in Figure 1D; in addition, the ratio of the intensities at 390
and 490 nm in aqueous acetonitrile solutions was about 4
times as great as that in acetonitrile, in qualitative agreement
with a high yield of 4 although the extinction coefficients
of the two radicals in these solvent mixtures are not known.
The kinetics of reactions of 1 were studied. PTOC ester 2
is stable in THF and in acetonitrile, and variable-temperature
studies were possible; the Arrhenius functions for reactions
in these solvents are given in eqs 1 and 2
The rate constants for reactions of 1 increase smoothly as
the solvent polarity increases from THF to aqueous aceto-
nitrile solutions, similar to the kinetic behavior observed in
other â-ester radical reactions. For example, the 15-fold
acceleration in reaction of 1 upon proceeding from THF to
acetonitrile is comparable to the acceleration in reactions of
radicals 6-8 in these solvents.4,5,8 The obvious difference
between radicals 6-8 and 1 is that the reactions of 6-8 do
not give different products in the different solvents; 6 and 7
react by diphenyl phosphate and trifluoroacetate migrations,
respectively, and radical 8 reacts in both solvents by a
combination of diphenyl phosphate migration and diphenyl-
phosphoric acid elimination reactions.4,5,8 The log A terms
in the Arrhenius functions (the entropic terms) for reactions
of radical 1 in THF and acetonitrile are similar to one another
as well as to those for reactions of radicals 6-8 in the same
solvents.4,5,8
log(k/s-1) ) (12.1 ( 0.8) - (9.7 ( 1.2)/2.3RT
log(k/s-1) ) (10.6 ( 0.7) - (6.1 ( 0.9)/2.3RT
(1)
(2)
for THF and CH3CN, respectively, where errors are at 2σ
and the Ea values are in kilocalories/mole. For reactions in
CH3CN, the rate constants for signal formation in the 312-
320- and 390-400-nm regions were comparable, suggesting
that relatively slow secondary reactions were not involved
in production of either product.16 Because PTOC esters
hydrolyze rapidly in aqueous solutions, studies in water/
acetonitrile mixtures were more difficult, requiring mixing
Both the kinetic solvent effects and the consistent entropies
of activation indicate that the fundamental mechanism of the
reaction of radical 1 does not change with solvent, even if
the products ultimately formed do. This is dramatically
illustrated by plotting the rate constants for reactions of 1
(15) The molar extinction coefficient for the 2-pyridinethiyl radical in
acetonitrile is 3200 M-1 cm-1 (ref 9). That for 4 is approximately 30 000
M-1 cm-1 as determined from oxidation of the styrene with the chloranil
triplet and comparison of the signal intensities for 4 and the chloranil radical
anion.
(16) We note, however, that this behavior only excludes a relatively slow
secondary reaction as the source of one product. It does not exclude the
possibility that two distinct reactions give rise to products 3 and 4 because
the kinetics are only reporting the total rate of loss of reactant radical 1,
irrespective of the number of reaction channels available.
(17) Reichardt, C. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 2319-2358. Skwierczynski,
R. D.; Connors, K. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 467-472.
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 1, 1999
155