transfer agents is rather limited.7 Therefore, our interest was
focused on homolytic carbostannylation utilizing the reactiv-
ity of stannyl enolates. We describe herein the AIBN-initiated
carbostannylation of alkenes and alkynes with ketone stannyl
enolates (Scheme 1, X ) O) and its application to the
cyclization of 1,6-enynes.
Trialkylstannyl enolates are in metalotropic equilibrium
between O- and C-stannylated forms (enol and keto forms).8
The keto form would not be available for the homolytic
substitution.6 Our study commenced with cyclohexanone
tributylstannyl enolate,9 which exists only as the enol form.8
Contrary to our expectation, the AIBN-initiated reaction of
methyl acrylate (2a), a good stannyl radical acceptor, with
the enolate resulted in no desired adduct. As the result of
experiments with several stannyl enolates, aromatic ketone
enolates were found to be generally reactive toward carbo-
metalation of electron-deficient alkenes.
Introduction of a fluorine atom at the para position of 1a
(1b, keto:enol ) 74:26) did not affect the reactivity toward
carbostannylation (entry 1 in Table 1). Interestingly, p-
Table 1. Carbostannylation of Alkenes 2 with Stannyl Enolates
1a
Acetophenone tributylstannyl enolate (1a) forms a 74:26
tautomeric mixture of keto and enol forms in C6D6 at room
temperature.10 In the presence of AIBN (0.2 equiv), treatment
of 2a with 1a (4 equiv) in benzene at 80 °C gave the
carbostannylated product 3aa in 40% yield (Scheme 2). The
Scheme 2
reactivity of acrylonitrile (2b) to 1a was similar to that of
2a. Without AIBN, the carbometalation was completely
suppressed. Baba et al. have reported that the bromide anion
promoted reaction of 2a with 1a affords the Michael adduct
4.11 This observation is consistent with the well-established
reactivity of stannyl enolates as carbon nucleophiles.12 In
contrast, the present reaction did not form 4 at all. Thus, the
radical-initiated system dramatically changed the reaction
course of 1a.
a All reactions were performed with 1 (2.00 mmol), 2 (0.50 mmol), and
AIBN (0.10 mmol) in benzene (2.5 mL) at 80 °C. b Sn ) SnBu3. The ratios
of keto to enol in C6D6 at room temperature are as follows: 1b, 74:26; 1c,
99:<1; 1d-f, <1:99. The value “<1” means that the minor tautomer was
not detected by 270 MHz 1H NMR. c The relative configuration was not
determined. d 2c: cyclohexyl acrylate (R1 ) CO2-c-Hex).
methoxy derivative 1c takes only the keto form. As predicted
from the structure, 1c was insensitive to 2a (entry 2). Stannyl
enolate 1d derived from propiophenone consists of only the
enol form feasible for the SH2′ reaction; however, the use
of 1d was not effective in improving the efficiency of
carbostannylation (entry 3). On the other hand, indanone and
tetralone stannyl enolates, 1e and 1f, showed higher reactivity
to electron-deficient alkenes, although they also are substi-
tuted at the reaction site (entries 4-8). Unfortunately, the
carbostannylation of styrene and 1-octene did not proceed
even with 1f.
As shown in Table 2, the carbostannylation of alkynes
with stannyl enolates 1a and 1f proceeded in an anti addition
mode to afford â,γ-unsaturated ketones.13 A similar trend
in stereoselectivity was observed in our previous study on
the radical-based allylstannylation.4 The stereochemical
(5) (a) Curran, D. P. ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 4, p 715. (b) Pereyre,
M.; Quintard, J.-P.; Rahm, A. Tin in Organic Synthesis; Butterworth:
London, 1987.
(6) (a) Russell, G. A.; Herold, L. L. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1037. (b)
Watanabe, Y.; Yoneda, T.; Ueno, Y.; Toru, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31,
6669.
(7) Quite recently, we have reported homolytic alkylation using stannyl
enolates: Miura, K.; Fujisawa, N.; Saito, H.; Wang, D.; Hosomi, A. Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 2591.
(8) Kobayashi, K.; Kawanisi, M.; Hitomi, T.; Kozima, S. Chem. Lett.
1984, 497.
(9) For preparation of stannyl enolates, see: Pereyre, M.; Bellegarde,
B.; Mendelsohn, J.; Valade, J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1968, 11, 97.
(10) Yasuda, M.; Katoh, Y.; Shibata, I.; Baba, A.; Matsuda, H.; Sonoda,
N. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4386.
(11) Yasuda, M.; Ohigashi, N.; Shibata, I.; Baba, A. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 2180.
(12) Davies, A. G. Organotin Chemistry; VCH: Weinheim, 1997.
4056
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 25, 2001