4294
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4294-4295
Self-Assembled Rigid-Rod Ionophores
Naomi Sakai, Nirmalya Majumdar, and Stefan Matile*
Department of Chemistry, Georgetown UniVersity
Washington, D.C. 20057
ReceiVed NoVember 10, 1998
ReVised Manuscript ReceiVed March 15, 1999
During the course of recent efforts to explore the scope and
limitations of rigid-rod molecules as versatile biomimetics,1 we
have observed giant ion channels formed at high voltages in planar
lipid bilayers with a lifetime of less than 0.1 ms (Figure 1A).1c
The proposed structure of this voltage-dependent ion channel, i.e.,
self-assembly 1n, could not be further studied because of its
transient nature, and design and synthesis of more stable analogues
was essential to determine structure and activity of toroidal rigid-
rod supramolecules. The use of interdigitating peptidic side chains
to establish â-sheets between rigid-rod scaffolds (e.g., 2n, Figure
1A) was particularly inviting because many biological toroidal
supramolecules have been shown to consist of â-barrels,2 and
cylindrical â-barrels formed by self-assembly of synthetic circular
peptides have been studied extensively.3 Most importantly, the
feasibility to create supramolecular, antiparallel â-sheets by
interdigitation has been demonstrated in an elegant model study,4
and the formation of â-sheets in, e.g., 2n is further likely to occur
with high cooperativity5 because of the preorganizing rigid-rod
scaffold. It is further interesting to note that despite their functional
versatility in biological systems, â-barrels have attracted little
attention for biomimetic modeling of complex biomolecules such
as ion channel proteins.1,3,6 Here we wish to report a model study
to define the minimal requirements for â-sheet formation inbe-
tween rigid-rod scaffolds, focusing on self-assembled, presumably
dimeric rigid-rod ionophore 22 (Figure 1B).7
Figure 1. (A) Hypothetical toroidal rigid-rod supramolecules with lateral
side chains containing vicinal diols (1n)1c or peptides (2n). (B) Self-
assembled dimer 22.
Scheme 1a
The rigid-rod octamers 2 and 3 were prepared from octa- and
tetraanisoles 41a and 5,1b respectively (Scheme 1). While tetra-
Leu 3 was readily prepared from tetraanisole 5 by aryl ether
cleavage, conversion of tetraphenol 6 to tetraglycolate 7, ester
hydrolysis, and amide formation of the resulting tetraacid 8, severe
solubility problems with octamethylglycolate 9 required modifica-
tions of this sequence to prepare octa-Leu 2. In sharp contrast to
methylglycolate 9, the corresponding tert-butyl ester 10 (obtained
from octaphenol 11 and tert-butyl bromoacetate) exhibited
a Key: (a) BBr3; (b) methyl bromoacetate, Cs2CO3, 76% from 5; (c)
1 M aqueous NaOH; (d) H-Leu-NH2, EDC, HOBt, NEt3, DMF, 68%
from 7; (e) BBr3; (f) see footnote b, 55% from 4; (g) tert-butyl
bromoacetate, Cs2CO3, 62% from 4; (h) TFA/CH2Cl2; (i) see footnote d,
14% from 10.
(1) (a) Weiss, L. A.; Sakai, N.; Ghebremariam, B.; Ni, C.; Matile, S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12142. (b) Ghebremariam, B.; Matile, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5335. (c) Sakai, N.; Ni, C.; Bezrukov, S. M.;
Matile, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 2743 and references therein.
(2) (a) Henning, M.; D’Arcy, A.; Hampele, I. C.; Page, M. P. G. Nature
Struct. Biol. 1998, 5, 357. (b) Kim, K. K.; Kim, R.; Kim, S.-H. Nature 1998,
394, 595. (c) Song, L.; Hobaugh, M. R.; Shustack, C.; Cheley, S.; Bayley,
H.; Gouaux, J. E. Science 1996, 274, 1859 and references therein.
(3) Clark, T. D.; Buriak, J. M.; Kobayashi, K.; Isler, M. P.; McRee, D. E.;
Ghadiri, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8949 and references therein.
(4) LaBrenz, S. R.; Kelly, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 1655.
(5) (a) Sharman, G. J.; Searle, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5291.
(b) Schenck, H. L.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4869. (c)
Kortemme, T.; Ramirez-Alvarado, M.; Serrano, L. Science 1998, 281, 253.
(6) For selected examples of artificial ion channels/channel models, see:
(a) Merritt, M.; Lanier, M.; Deng, G.; Regen, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 8494. (b) de Mendoza, J.; Cuevas, F.; Prados, P.; Meadows, E. S.; Gokel,
G. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 1534. (c) Fyles, T. M.; Loock,
D.; Zhou, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2997. (d) Meillon, J.-C.; Voyer,
N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 967. (e) Lear, J. D.; Schneider, J.
P.; Kienker, P. K.; DeGrado, W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3212. (f)
Wagner, H.; Harms, K.; Koert, U.; Meder, S.; Boheim, G. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2643. (g) Tanaka, Y.; Kobuke, Y.; Sokabe, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 693.
excellent physical properties and could be cleaved under mild
conditions to give octaacid 12. However, the final rigid-rod octa-
Leu 2 was again difficult to purify, presumably due to the
ionophoric properties of its dimer 22 (see below), and extensive
exposure of the product to PTLC and RP-HPLC accounts for the
low yield of the final step.
Although the oligomeric nature of 2 limited the applicability
of NMR spectroscopy, 2D 1H,1H-COSY NMR experiments (D2O/
CD3OD) allowed us to assign the C(R)-H resonances at 4.32-
4.52 ppm. Their downfield shift with respect to random coil values
(4.17 ( 0.1 ppm)8 is indicative for, in this case, self-assembly
by intermolecular â-sheet formation, because intramolecular
â-sheet formation along the rigid-rod scaffold is sterically unlikely.
The negative Cotton effect (CE) at 216 nm in the concentration-
(7) For selected examples of self-assembled ionophores, see: (a) Davis, J.
T.; Tirumala, S. K.; Marlow, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5271. (b)
Gottarelli, G.; Masiero, S.; Spada, G. P. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995,
2555. (c) Schepartz, A.; McDevitt, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5976.
(8) Wishart, D. S.; Sykes, B. D.; Richards, F. M. Biochemistry 1992, 31,
1647.
10.1021/ja983893s CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/15/1999