Study of Reactions of Silver and Sulfur Clusters
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 103, No. 17, 1999 3339
TABLE 1: Photodissociation Percentagea of Reaction
IP/Ag ) 7.57 eV),26 so the positive sulfur cluster ions are
relatively less easy to generate.
Products [AgSn]+ (n ) 4, 8, 12, 16)
The study7 of sulfur in the condensed phase shows that sulfur
atoms can easily bond to each other to form molecules with
undetermined atom numbers. The structure of orthogonal sulfur
with 16 S8 in a unit cell is the most stable at room temperature
and atmosphere. The ring S8 molecule has a structure similar
to the skull structure with D4d symmetry. Gas phase sulfur exists
mainly in the forms of S6, S7, and S8, while S8 is the most
abundant at the temperature below 673 K. This fact supports
our assumption that [AgS12]+ and [AgS16]+ are produced
through the addition of S8 on [AgS4]+ and [AgS8]+, respectively.
In comparison, we can see that the reaction products and the
reaction mechanism by LDAR are different from those by
FTICR. The former is of the reactions between the emitted
species (atoms, molecules, and clusters) generated by laser
ablation. In this case, the product species is more various than
that generated by FTICR, and there also exist many possible
reaction channels for the product formation.
photofragments
products
Ag+
[AgS2]+
1.05
[AgS3]+
0.50
[AgS4]+
[AgS8]+
[AgS4]+
[AgS8]+
[AgS12]+
[AgS16]+
0.56
0.82
0.68
16.0
10.5
a Photodissociation percentage ) (intensity of fragments/sum of
intensity of fragments and product) × 100.
From the discussion as above, we can describe the process
of cluster reactions by LDAR as follows: By laser ablation,
silver and sulfur samples are vaporized, and then the clustering
occurs. Silver ions from the silver sample react with sulfur atoms
or clusters from sulfur sample to produce [AgS4]+ and [AgS8]+,
and then [AgS4]+ and [AgS8]+ react with S8 to form [AgS12]+
and [AgS16]+, respectively.
Figure 4. Mass spectrum of positive ions produced from a sample of
silver.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank Professor G. D. Willett
and Dr. K. J. Fisher of the University of New South Wales for
the discussion of the experimental results. This research is
funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China.
From the distribution of photofragments, we can observe that
[AgS4]+ and [AgS8]+ are the main photofragments of [AgS12]+
and [AgS16]+; i.e., they arise from the same dissociation channel
in which S8 is stripped from [AgS12]+ and [AgS16]+, respec-
tively. So, it might be suggested that in the structure of [AgS12]+
and [AgS16]+ there are weak combinations between S8 and
[AgS4]+ and [AgS8]+, respectively. For the photodissociation
of [AgS4]+ and [AgS8]+, there are few fragments (see Table
1). This means that there may not be such weak interactions in
their structure. In the condensed phase, the S-S bond strength
(4.40 eV) is stronger than a S-Ag bond (2.25 eV),23,24 but all
bond strength are lower than the energy of a 193 nm photon
(6.42 eV). We can suggest that in [AgS4]+ and [AgS8]+ the
silver atom is bonded to the above two sulfur atoms. Fisher et
al. studied the reaction between Ag+ and HSC6H5 in the gas
phase and calculated the geometry energy surface of the product
[AgHSC6H5]+.8,9 For the geometry-optimized structure of
[AgHSC6H5]+ with the lowest energy, the silver atom is bonded
to the sulfur atom. This kind of bond may appear in the structure
of [AgS12]+ and [AgS16]+. So, [AgS12]+ and [AgS16]+ have
different bonding characters from [AgS4]+ and [AgS8]+.
References and Notes
(1) Wells, A. F. In Structural Inorganic Chemistry; Clarendon Press:
Oxford, 1975; p 607.
(2) Amiel, O.; Wada, H. J. Solid State Chem. 1995, 115, 112.
(3) Khan, M. M. T.; Bhardwajand, R. C.; Bhardwaj, C. Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy 1988, 13, 7.
(4) Bixian, P.; Weidong, C.; Yu, Z.; Gao, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Kong, F. Sci.
China, Ser. B 1997, 40, 182.
(5) Dhumure, S. S.; Lokhande, C. D. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
1992, 28, 159.
(6) Kitova, S.; Eneva, J.; Panov, A. J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 1994,
38, 484.
(7) Guo, D. In Inorganic Chemistry Series; Chinese Sciences Press,
1990 Vol. 5, p 158.
(8) Dance, I. G.; Fisher, K. J.; Willett, G. D. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 35,
4177.
(9) Fisher, K. J.; Dance, I. G.; G. D. Willett. Rapid Commun. Mass
Spectrom. 1996, 10, 106.
(10) McElvany, S. W. Cassady, C. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 2057.
(11) Z. Yu, et al., Huaxue Tongbao 1994, 6, 31.
(12) Parent, D. C.; Anderson, S. L. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 1541.
(13) T. G. Dietz, et al., J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 74, 6511.
(14) King, F. L.; Dunlap, B. I.; Parent, D. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 94,
2578.
(15) Parent, D. C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1991, 183, 45.
(16) Cassady, C. J.; Weil, D. A.; McElvany, S. W. J. Chem. Phys. 1992,
96, 691.
(17) McElvany, S. W. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 89, 2063.
(18) Parent, D. C.; McElvany, S. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2393.
(19) Maruyama, S.; Anderson, L. R.; Smalley, R. E. ReV. Sci. Instrum.
1990, 61 (12), 3686.
(20) D. M. Cox, D. ACS Symp. Ser. 1990, No. 173, 437.
(21) Gao, Z. Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 5, 343.
(22) Gao, Z.; Liu, P. ReV. Sci. Instrum. 1998, 69 (4), 1837.
(23) Smoes, S. Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1972, 81, 45.
(24) Hubert, K. P.; Herzberg, G. In Molecular Spectra and Molecular
Structure Constants of Diatomic Molecules in Van Nostrand: New York,
1979.
+
Eyler et al.25 studied the reactions between Ag2 and
diethylaniline (DEAN), and between Ag2+ and dimethylaniline
+
(DMAN). The reaction products of AgLn (L ) DEAN,
+
DMAN) were obtained. This suggests that Ag+ and Ag2 can
both react with some molecules to generate the products in the
form of AgLn+. Figure 4 is the mass spectrum of the positive
ions produced from the silver sample by 532 nm laser ablation.
+
+
It is obvious that Ag+ is more abundant than Ag2 and Ag3
.
So, we can suggest that the products [AgSn]+ (n ) 4, 8, 12,
16) are produced mainly from reactions between Ag+ and Sn.
It is possible also that the products [AgSn]+ are formed by
the reactions between sulfur cluster ions and silver atoms or
molecules. However, the ionization potential of sulfur is much
larger than that of silver (IP/S ) 10.36 eV, IP/S2 ) 9.356 eV,
(25) Cheeseman, M. A.; Eyler, J. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 1082.
(26) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 73rd ed.; Boca Ratan,
FL, 1992.