A. Drzewiecka-Antonik et al.
Polyhedron 207 (2021) 115370
Table 1
The unit cell parameters for polycrystalline complexes.
Complex
Crystal system
a (Å)
b (Å)
c (Å)
α
(◦)
β (◦)
γ (◦)
V (Å3)
Mn(MCPA)2⋅2H2O
Mn(2,4-D)2⋅2H2O
Mn(4-Br)2⋅3H2O
Monoclinic
Monoclinic
Monoclinic
6.7839 ± 0.0077
8.0300 ± 0.0072
20.3700 ± 0.0056
17.3769 ± 0.0066
7.3310 ± 0.0063
3.8300 ± 0.0013
20.547 ± 0.030
17.679 ± 0.0083
5.1200 ± 0.0029
90
90
90
95.213 ± 0.035
94.233 ± 0.064
115.170 ± 0.075
90
90
90
2412.12 ± 0.05
1037.86 ± 0.02
399.44 ± 0.02
methylphenoxyacetic (MCPA), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic (2,4-D) and
4-bromophenoxyacetic (4-Br) acids. The compounds were characterized
by elemental analysis, X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF), X-ray
powder diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetry method, attenuated total
reflection infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR) and magnetic susceptibility
measurements. For the complex with bromo derivative, after its
recrystallization from N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) solution, we were
able to receive crystals for X-ray single crystal structure analysis.
diffraction patterns of all complexes and the products of their decom-
position process were registered on a HZG-4 (Carl-Zeiss, Jena) diffrac-
tometer using Ni filtered CuKα radiation. The measurements were made
within the range of 2θ = 4-80◦ by means of Bragg-Brentano method. For
the interpretation of diffractograms (Figs. 1S-3S in the Supplementary
material) the Dicvol 06 programme was used.
2.3. Thermal characterization of complexes
2. Experimental part
The thermal stability and decomposition process of complexes were
studied in air using a Setsys 16/18 (Setaram) TG, DTG and DSC instru-
ment. The experiments were carried out under air flow in the temper-
ature range of 293 – 1173 K at a heating rate of 5 K⋅minꢀ 1. The initial
masses of samples changed from 5.42 to 5.01 mg. The compounds were
heated in Al2O3 crucibles.
2.1. Synthesis of complexes
The solvents and all chemicals used for the synthesis were of
commercially available reagent grade and were applied without further
purification. 4-Chloro-2-methyl-; 2,4-dichloro-, and 4-bromo-phenoxya-
cetates of ammonium (pH ~ 5) of 0.1 mol/L concentration were pre-
pared by the addition of NH3 (aq) solution (25% pure) to respective
phenoxyacetic acids in water solution (99% pure).
2.4. Magnetic characterization of complexes
Magnetic susceptibilities of samples were investigated at 1.8 – 300 K
with the use of Quantum Design SQUID-VSM magnetometer. The
superconducting magnet was operated at a field strength ranging from
0 to 7 T. Measurements of samples were made at magnetic field of 0.1 T.
The SQUID magnetometer was calibrated with the palladium rod sam-
ple. Correction for diamagnetism of the constituent atoms was calcu-
lated by the use of Pascal’s constants. The effective magnetic moment
The complexes were synthesized by the addition of equivalent
quantities of 0.1 mol/L ammonium salt of respective acid (pH ~ 5) to a
warm solutions of MnCl2⋅4H2O and by crystallizing at 293 K. To reach of
equilibrium state the solids were constantly stirred for 1 h. Next they
were filtered off, washed with warm water to remove ammonium and
chloride ions and dried at 303 K to a constant mass.
values were calculated from the equation: µ = 2.83 (χm⋅T)1/2, where:
Mn(MCPA)2⋅2H2O
eff
Yield: 53.84%, pinkish solid
µeff - effective magnetic moment, χm – magnetic susceptibility per
ATR-IR: 3471, 3264 (
ν
OHwater), 1631 (νasCOO–), 1593 (νasCOO–),
molecule and T - absolute temperature.
1557 (νasCOO–), 1334 (νsCOO–),1223 (
ν
Car–Oether), 1054 (
ν
Car–Cl) cmꢀ 1
Anal. Calc. for Mn(C9H5O3Cl)2⋅2H2O: C, 44.49; H, 4.08; Cl, 14.49;
Mn, 11.21% Found: C, 44.08; H, 4.07; Cl, 14.40; Mn, 11.00%
Mn(2,4-D)2⋅2H2O
2.5. Single crystal X-ray diffraction of the recrystallized complex
The X-ray diffraction intensities for the single crystal of the Mn(II)
complex with 4-bromophenoxyacetic acid (recrystallized from DMF)
were collected at 120 K on SuperNova X-ray diffractometer equipped
with Atlas S2 CCD detector using the mirror-monochromatized CuKα
Yield: 63.42%, white solid
ATR-IR: 3554, 3292 (
ν
OHwater), 1606 (νasCOO–), 1579 (νasCOO–),
1560 (νasCOO–), 1341 (νsCOO–), 1230 (
νCar–Oether), 1049 (
ν
Car–Cl) cmꢀ 1
Anal. Calc. for Mn(C8H5O3Cl2)2⋅2H2O: C, 36.16; H, 2.64; Cl, 26.74;
Mn, 10.36% Found: C, 36.18; H, 2.64; Cl, 26.68; Mn, 9.82%
Mn(4-Br)2⋅3H2O
radiation (λ = 1.54184 Å). Data were collected using the
ω scan tech-
nique, with an angular scan width of 1.0◦. The programs CrysAlis CCD,
CrysAlis Red and CrysAlisPro [5,6] were used for data collection, cell
refinement and data reduction. The analytical numeric absorption
correction based on indexing of crystal faces was applied [7]. The
structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXS-97 and refined by
the full-matrix least-squares on F2 using the SHELXL-97 [8]. The H-
atoms were positioned geometrically and allowed to ride on their parent
atoms, with Uiso(H) = 1.5 Ueq(C) for methyl groups and 1.2 Ueq(C) for the
rest groups. The DMF molecule has high thermal ellipsoids due to weak
intermolecular interactions. Crystallographic data are given in Tables 1S
in the Supplementary Material.
Yield: 69.80%, pinkish solid
ATR-IR: 3507, 3348 (
ν
OHwater), 1646 (νasCOO–), 1589 (νasCOO–),
1580 (νasCOO–), 1341 (νsCOO–), 1231 (
νCar–Oether), 1054 (νC –Br)
ar
cmꢀ 1
Anal. Calc. for Mn(C8H6O3Br)2⋅3H2O: C, 33.62; H, 3.50; Br, 28.02;
Mn, 9.63% Found: C, 33.62; H, 3.25; Br, 28.00; Mn, 9.62%
The colourless crystals of Mn(II) complex with 4-bromophenoxyace-
tic acid (recrystallized from DMF) suitable for an X-ray single crystal
structure analysis, were obtained by a slow evaporation of the solvent
from DMF solution at room temperature.
Crystal Data for C114H114Br12Mn6N6O42 (M = 3528.66 g/mol):
trigonal, space group P-3 (no. 147), a = 16.9142(6) Å, c = 13.4364(6) Å,
2.2. Structural characterization of complexes
V = 3329.0(2) Å3, Z = 1, T = 120.01(10) K,
μ(Cu Kα) = 9.411 mm-1,
Dcalc = 1.76 g/cm3, 56,180 reflections measured (8.94◦ ≤ 2Θ ≤
154.92◦), 4662 unique (Rint = 0.0710, Rsigma = 0.0244) which were used
The contents of carbon and hydrogen in complexes were determined
by elemental analysis using CHN 2400 Perkin – Elmer analyser. The
amounts of metal and halogen atoms were established by X-ray fluo-
rescence (XRF) method using spectrophotometer with energy dispersion
ED XRF-1510 (Canberra – Packard). The ATR-IR spectra of complexes
and their parent ligands were recorded over the range of 4000 – 400
cmꢀ 1 using Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS5 spectrometer. The X-ray
in all calculations. The final R1 was 0.0432 (I>=2μ(I)) and wR2 was
0.1174 (all data).
CCDC 2,089,845 contains the supplementary crystallographic data,
2