monochromated Mo-Ka radiation (0.71073 Å) with w-2q scan mode. The
structures were solved by direct methods (SHELXS97)20 and refined on F2
by full-matrix least-squares (SHELXL97).21 The carbon bonded H-atoms
were included in calculated positions and refined using a riding model with
isotropic displacement parameters equal to 1.2 Ueq of the attached C atom.
Crystal structure analyses: 2: C32H48LiN2O3S2V, M = 630.72, monoclinic,
space group C2/c, a = 27.297(5), b = 18.880(4), c = 17.444(3) Å, b =
126.76(3), U = 7203(2) Å3, Z = 8, Dc = 1.163 Mg m23, m = 0.422 mm21
,
F(000) = 2688. A total of 4086 reflections with 2q @ 50° were collected,
of which 3463 had I ! 2s(I). Final residuals are R1 = 0.0357, wR2
0.1007 and GOF = 1.075 for 380 variables.
=
3: C21H30NO2S2V, M = 443.52, monoclinic, space group P21/n, a =
10.022(3), b 12.156(4), c 18.628(4) Å, b 98.44(3)°, U
=
=
=
=
2244.8(11) Å3, Z = 4, Dc = 1.312, m = 0.643 mm21, F(000) = 936. A total
of 3526 reflections with 2q @ 50° were collected, of which 3108 had I !
2s(I). Final residuals are R1 = 0.0269, wR2 = 0.0760 and GOF = 1.124 for
248 variables.
crystallographic files in .cif format.
1 V. J. Murphy and H. Turner, Organometallics, 1997, 16, 2495; F. J.
Feher and J. F. Walzer, Inorg. Chem., 1991, 30, 1689; F. J. Feher, J. F.
Walzer and R. L. Balnski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 3618; F. J.
Feher and R. L. Balnski, Organometallics, 1993, 12, 958; J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1992, 114, 5886.
2 S. Scheuer, J. Fischer and J. Kress, Organometallics, 1995, 14, 2627.
3 W. L. Carrick, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1958, 80, 6455; W. L. Carrick, R. W.
Kluiber, E. F. Bonner, L. H. Wartman, F. M. Rugg and J. J. Smith, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1960, 82, 3883; D. L. Christman, J. Polym. Sci., Polym.
Chem. Ed., 1972, 10, 472; M. H. Lehr and C. J. Carmen, Macromole-
cules, 1969, 2, 217; M. H. Lehr, Macromolecules, 1968, 1, 178.
4 Y. Doi, N. Tokuhiro, M. Nunomura, H. Miyake and K. Soga, in
Transition Metals and Organometallics as Catalysts for Olefin
Polymerization, ed. W. Kaminsky and H. Sinn, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,
1998; V. E. Junghanns, V. A. Gumboldt and G. Bier, Makromol. Chem.,
1962, 58, 18; V. A. Gumboldt, J. Helberg and G. Schleitzer, Makromol.
Chem., 1967, 101, 229.
Fig. 2 The molecular structure of 3 (the displacement ellipsoids are drawn
at the 30% probability level; the C bonded H atoms are excluded for clarity;
the C atoms are represented by circles of arbitrary radii). Selected bond
lengths (Å): V–S(1) 2.2970(9), V–S(2) 2.2987(8), V–O(1) 2.1195(14), V–
O(2) 1.8619(13), V–N 2.1306(17).
Table 1 Polymerizationa of ethylene with vanadium–MgCl2–AlEt2Cl
catalysts
Productivityb/
T/K kg(g V h)21
Catalyst system
Mw/Mn
d/g cm23
5 W. Kaminsky, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1998, 1413; M. Bochmann,
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1996, 255.
1/MgCl2/AlEt2Cl
3/MgCl2/AlEt2Cl
323
323
39
20
2.7
3.8
0.964
0.961
6 T. Miyatake, K. Mizunuma and M. Kakugo, Makromol. Chem.,
Macromol. Symp., 1993, 66, 203; S. Fokken, T. P. Spaniol, H-C. Kang,
W. Massa and J. Okuda, Organometallics, 1996, 15, 5069.
7 See for example R. R. Eady and G. J. Leigh, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans., 1994, 2739 and refs. therein.
a Conditions: [V]0 = 0.02 mmol dm23, [Al] = 10 mmol dm23, Mg:V =
10, Pethylene = 0.6 MPa. b Mass in kg of polymer formed per g of vanadium
atoms in 1 h.
8 F. J. Karol, K. J. Cann and B. E. Wagner, in Transition Metals and
Organometallics as Catalysts for Olefin Polymerization, ed. W.
Kaminsky and H. Sinn, Springer, New York, 1988, pp. 149–161.
9 P. D. Smith, J. L Martin, J. C. Huffman, R. L Bansemer and K. G
Caulton, Inorg. Chem., 1985, 24, 2997.
10 W. C. A. Wilisch, M. J. Scott and W. H. Armstrong, Inorg. Chem., 1988,
27, 4335.
11 S. Gambarotta, F. Van Bolhuis and M. Y. Chiang, Inorg. Chem., 1987,
26, 4303.
12 C. R. Randall and W. H. Armstrong, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1988, 986.
13 S. C. Davies, D. L. Hughes, Z. Janas, L. B. Jerzykiewicz, R. L. Richards
J. R. Sanders and P. Sobota, Chem. Commun., 1997, 1261.
14 G. Henkel, B. Krebs and W. Schmidt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.,
1992, 31, 1366.
15 R. W. Wiggins, J. C. Huffman and G. Christou, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1983, 1313; D. Szeymies, B. Krebs and G. Henkel, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1983, 22, 885; J. R. Dorfman and R. H. Holm,
Inorg. Chem., 1983, 22, 3179.
16 In a typical test of ethylene homopolymerization the catalyst was
prepared by milling a n-hexane slurry of [MgCl2(THF)2] with the
vanadium compound and AlEt2Cl as the cocatalyst. In all cases studied
an immediate exotherm indicated polymerization; reaction temperatures
were kept at 323 K and pressure at 0.6 MPa. After 1 h the reactor was
opened and the polymer was filtered off, washed with acidic methanol
and water, and dried in vacuo.
distance is also near the values observed in the other Viii–
pyridine complexes.11
Compounds 1 and 3, in combination with AlEt2Cl and
MgCl2, are highly active towards ethylene polymerization.16
Yields and polymer characterization data are listed in Table 1.
The amount of polyethylene (PE) produced by the catalysts is
comparable to the catalyst based on VCl3.17 The molecular
weight distribution Mw/Mn of the PE obtained in the first
catalytic system is < 3, and in the second one is > 3. These
findings indicate that the polymerization process in 1/MgCl2/
AlEt2Cl proceeds on a single vanadium site in a homogeneous
system, however for 3/MgCl2/AlEt2Cl a heterogeneous system
appears to operate. Hence, the catalytic activity of the 1/MgCl2/
AlEt2Cl system is almost twice that of the 3/MgCl2/AlEt2Cl
system.
To our knowledge complexes 1 and 3 represent the first
examples of vanadium-thiolate catalyst precursors for ethylene
polymerization. We suggest that the V{O(CH2CH2S)2} moiety
is maintained in the catalyst assembly and that the geometry of
such catalytic species plays an important role in determining the
reactivity. It is worth noting that vanadium catalysts are very
important in ethylene–propylene rubber production.18
The authors thank the State Committee for Scientific
Research for financial support of this work (Grant No. 3 T09A
131 15), and Dr Krzysztof Szczegot of the University of Opole
for preliminary polymerization tests.
17 K. J. Cann, D. L. Miles and F. J. Karol, US. Pat., 4 670 526, 1987; X.
Bai, US Pat., 5 410 003, 1995.
18 F. J. Karol, Macromol. Symp., 1996, 154, 83.
19 Kuma Diffraction. Kuma KM4 software. User’s Guide, version 6.1
Kuma Diffraction, Wroclaw, Poland, 1996.
20 G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 1990, 467.
21 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL97, Program for the Refinement of Crystal
Structures, University of Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1997.
Notes and references
† Crystal data for 2 and 3: The crystals were sealed in glass capillaries under
a dinitrogen stream. Preliminary examination and data collections were
carried out on a KUMA KM-4 four-circle diffractometer19 using graphite-
Communication 9/00916G
1016
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1105–1106