Resolution of Aryl-Substituted Allylic Alcohols
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 66, No. 17, 2001 5799
ment through 1,3-allylic strain and hydrogen bonding
between substrate and reagent cooperate.
To rationalize the observed enantioselectivity, the
Katsuki trajectory 3 needs to be examined in more
detail.5 Katsuki postulated that the allylic alcohol 2a
should approach the Mn(V)oxo functionality of the (S,S)-
Mn(V)oxo species as shown in Figure 2, that is, the
substrate should come from the right side and the phenyl
group should point away from the right-hand aryl group
of the salen ligand to avoid π-π interaction. Since along
this attack only the (S) enantiomer of allylic alcohol 2a
may hydrogen-bond 2 effectively, the (S)-2a enantiomer
is oxidized preferentially to the threo-configured (2S,-
3R,4S)-cis-epoxide 3a and the (2S,3R,4R)-trans-epoxide
3a , while the (R)-2a enantiomer is enriched. In this way,
the enantioselectivity displayed in the manganese-
catalyzed kinetic resolution of allylic alcohol 2a may be
accounted for in terms of the mutual assistance of the
hydroxy-directing effect and the attack along the Katsuki
trajectory.
While this rationale also applies to the substrates 2b
(Table 1, entries 3 and 4) and 2e,f (entries 9-12), the
stereochemical results (entries 5 and 6) for 1,1-dimethyl-
1,2-dihydronaphthalen-2-ol (2c) cannot be explained in
this way. According to the Katsuki rationale, the epoxi-
dation of the cyclic allylic alcohol 2c with the (S,S)-1a
catalyst should preferentially lead to the (2R)-configured
epoxide cis-3c; however, the opposite enantiomer, namely,
(2S)-cis-3c, is observed (Table 1, entry 5). This discrep-
ancy may be explained in terms of the allylic CH
oxidation of substrate rac-2c, which constitutes the main
reaction pathway. Thus, the kinetic resolution in this step
rather than in the epoxidation is responsible for the
observed enantioselectivity. Indeed, in a control experi-
ment with the enantiomerically enriched allylic alcohol
2c (cf. Results section, Scheme 2), it was shown that the
(S)-2c enantiomer was oxidized preferentially to the
enone 4c by the (S,S)-1a catalyst (3c:4c ) 27:73), while
the (R)-2c enantiomer was epoxidized more readily (3c:
4c ) 66:34). If the enantioselectivity in the CH oxidation
were the same for both enantiomers (S)-2c and (R)-2c,
the kinetic resolution of allylic alcohol rac-2c would be
dictated by the asymmetric epoxidation and not by the
enantioselective enone formation. Consequently, when a
racemic mixture of the allylic alcohol rac-2c and the
catalyst (S,S)-1a is subjected to the standard reaction
conditions, the (S)-2c enantiomer is oxidized preferen-
tially to the enone 4c rather than being epoxidized to the
(2R)-configured cis-3c epoxy alcohol, and therefore, the
(R)-2c enantiomer is enriched by the former reaction
mode. The epoxidation of the substrate 2c to the epoxy
alcohols 3c could also proceed enantioselectively, but that
this is evidently not the case is already suggested by the
fact that (2R)-cis-3c should be formed preferentially
according to the Katsuki rationale. More significant, the
manganese-catalyzed epoxidation of the methyl deriva-
tive 2d , which is prohibited to undergo CH oxidation,
proceeded in poor enantioselectivity (Table 1, entries 7
and 8). Thus, the (R)-2c enantiomer, which was enriched
by enantioselective CH oxidation, is epoxidized to the
(2S)-cis- and (2S)-trans-3c epoxy alcohols without sub-
stantial additional kinetic resolution (Table 1, entries 5
and 6).
F igu r e 1. CD (upper) and UV (lower) spectra of the benzoate
(dark line) and acetate (light line) derivatives of the allylic
alcohol 2c.
Since the manganese-catalyzed epoxidation of the
substrates 2d and 2f were poorly selective (cf. Table 1,
entries 7, 8, 11, and 12), the absolute configurations of
the allylic alcohols 2d ,f and their epoxides 3d ,f were not
determined. The enantiomerically enriched allylic alco-
hols 2a -c,e (20-53% ee), whose absolute configurations
are known, were epoxidized to give both diastereomers
of the epoxy-alcohols 3a -c,e. By comparison of HPLC
retention times and the signs of optical rotation (see
Supplementary Information), the absolute configurations
of the epoxy alcohols 3a -c,e were assessed.
Discu ssion
As shown in the Results section, when the model
substrate (Z)-4-phenyl-3-buten-2-ol (2a ) was allowed to
react with the (S,S)-1a catalyst under the standard
conditions, the (S)-2a enantiomer was epoxidized to the
threo-configured cis-(2S,3R,4S)-epoxide 3a (73% ee) and
the trans-(2S,3R,4R)-epoxide 3a (80% ee), while the (R)-
configured allylic alcohol 2a was enantiomerically en-
riched up to 46% ee (Table 1, entry 1). The diastereo-
and enatioselectivity of this manganese-catalyzed epoxi-
dation may be rationalized in terms of the synergistic
interplay between the hydroxy-directing effect3,15 and the
attack along the Katsuki trajectory5 (Figure 2). On the
basis of 1,3-allylic strain 1, the preferred conformer is
given in Figure 2, in which the hydrogen atom at the C-2
position of the substrate points toward the phenyl ring.
Favorable hydrogen bonding 2 between the hydroxy
functionality of substrate 2a and the Mn(V)oxo function-
ality obliges attack from that π face of the double bond
such that the oxygen transfer leads to the threo-epoxides
3a as the main diastereomer. Thus, the observed threo
diastereoselectivity (Table 1, entries 1 and 2) underlies
hydroxy-directivity control, in which conformational align-
It remains to explain why (E)-4-phenyl-3-penten-2-ol
(2e) is epoxidized selectively (up to 51% ee), while its (Z)-
diastereomer 2f is not (Table 1, entries 9-12). As shown
(15) Adam, W.; Wirth, T. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 703-710.