Reductive Coupling of an Indenylidene with Calcium
Organometallics, Vol. 18, No. 17, 1999 3473
concentrating the filtrate and cooling: total yield, 22.4 g (60%);
mp, 58-59 °C. H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.68 (s, 1H, fulvenyl-H);
pin was mounted on a goniometer head. Crystals of 2 were
grown by slow diffusion of petroleum ether into a THF solution
of the compound. A suitable crystal was mounted in a glass
capillary under a nitrogen atmosphere. Crystals of 3 were
grown from a concentrated benzene solution that was cooled
at 5 °C for several days. After the benzene was decanted from
the crystals, they were coated with mineral oil. A suitable
crystal was mounted on a pin with silicon grease, and the pin
was mounted on a goniometer head and immediately placed
under a nitrogen stream.
1
7.54-7.64 (m, 2 H, H2′, H6′); 7.41-7.50 (m, 2H, H3′, H5′), 7.32-
7.40 (m, 1H, H4′), 7.10 (dd, 1H, H5 or H6), 6.88-7.2 (m, 3H,
H2, H3, and H5 or H6), 2.68, 2.45 (s, each 3H, CH3). 13C NMR
(CDCl3): δ 143.1, 141.6, 137.7, 133.0, 130.4, 128.1 (C1, C4, C7,
C8, C9, and C1′), 133.0 (CHPh), 130.4 (C2′ and C6′), 128.9 (C2
or C3), 131.5 (C2 or C3), 126.3 (C5 or C6), 128.4 (C3′ and C5′),
127.8(C4′), 21.4, 18.0 (CH3). Anal. Calcd for C18H16: C, 93.0;
H, 6.7. Found: C, 93.0; H, 6.9.
P r ep a r a tion of P h 2C2H2-(η5-4,7-Me2C9H4)2Ca (THF )2, 2.
Calcium granules (0.65 g, 16 mmol) were activated with HgCl2
(0.047 g, 0.17 mmol) by combining the two solids in 150 mL
THF, letting the mixture sit undisturbed for 1 h, under a
blanket of argon, and then rapidly stirring the mixture for 1
h. The fulvene 1 (1.7 g, 7.3 mmol) was added to the solution
at room temperature with stirring. On addition of the fulvene
the solution initially turned green then grayish-brown. The
mixture was stirred at room temperture for 8 h. The excess
calcium was removed by filtration, and the filtrate was
evaporated to dryness to yield a beige foam that was washed
twice with hexane. The solid was resuspended in diethyl ether,
cooled at -78 °C, and filtered cold to afford 2 as a white,
flocculent solid (yield, 1.3 g, 55%). 1H NMR (C6D6); mixture of
Data were collected using a Siemens (Bruker) SMART CCD
(charge coupled device) based diffractometer equipped with an
LT-2 low-temperature apparatus operating around -54 °C. A
total of 1271 frames of data were collected using ω scans with
a scan width of 0.3° per frame for 30 s. Additional parameters
are available in the cif file. The first 50 frames were recollected
at the end of data collection to monitor for decay. Cell
parameters were retrieved using SMART software (V. 4.050,
Bruker Analytical X-ray Systems, Madison, WI, 1995) and
refined using SAINT (V. 4.050, Bruker Analytical X-ray
Systems, Madison, WI, 1995) on all observed reflections. Data
reduction was performed using the SAINT software which
corrects for Lp and decay. Absorption corrections were applied
using SADABS (Program for absorption corrections using
Siemens CCD based on the method of Robert Blessing26). The
structures were solved by the direct method using the SHELXS-
97 program (Sheldrick, G. M., University of Go¨ttingen, Ger-
many, 1997) and refined by the least-squares method on F2
using SHELXL-97, which is incorporated in SHELXTL-PC V
5.10 (PC/UNIX-Version, Bruker Analytical X-ray Systems,
Madison, WI, 1995). All non-hydrogen atoms were refined
anisotropically. Hydrogen positions were calculated by geo-
metrical methods and refined as a Riding model. In each case,
the crystals used for the diffraction studies showed no decom-
position during data collection.
3
isomers): δ 7.83 (d,3J HH ) 7.1 Hz, Ph-H); 7.59 (d, J HH ) 6.9
3
Hz, Ph-H); 7.29 (d, J HH ) 3.4 Hz, H5 and H6); 7.13-6.94 (m,
H5 or H6 and Ph-H); 6.82 (s, PhCHCp), 6.59-6.43 (m, H2 and
3
H3 and Ph-H); 6.11, 5.98 (d, J HH ) 3.4 Hz, H2 and H3); 6.03
(s, PhCHCp); 3.04, 2.95, 2.32, 2.30 (s, 4,7-CH3); 2.88, 1.15 (br,
THF). 13C NMR (C6D6; mixture of isomers): δ 130.3, 129.6 (C5
and C6); 126.4, 126.2, 125.4, 125.0, 124.8, 120.5, 120.0, 119.8,
118.0 (C1, C4, C5, C6, C8, C9 and phenyl carbons); 117.0, 114.5,
95.1, 94.0 (C2 and C3); 68.5, 24.8 (THF); 55.0, 50.5 (PhCHCp);
22.8, 21.6, 19.2 (4,7-CH3). Anal. Calcd for C44H48O2Ca: C,
81.44; H, 7.45. Found: C, 81.07; H, 7.12.
P r ep a r a tion of P h 2C2H2-(η5-4,7-Me2C9H4)2F e, 3. THF (50
mL) was vacuum-transferred onto a mixture of FeCl2 (0.20 g,
1.5 mmol) and 2 (1.0 g, 1.5 mmol) at -78 °C, and the reaction
mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred over-
night with the entire reaction vessel wrapped in aluminum
foil to exclude light. The resulting deep purple solution was
dried under vacuum, and the product was redissolved in 50
mL of toluene and filtered to remove the CaCl2 byproduct. The
CaCl2 was washed repeatedly with toluene, and the combined
filtrate and washings were concentrated to 10 mL and cooled
to -78 °C to precipitate 3 as a purple solid: yield, 0.31 g, 40%.
1H NMR (C6D6; trans-rac and cis-meso isomers): δ 7.42, 6.91-
7.18 (m, phenyl-H). 1H NMR (C6D6; trans-rac isomer): δ 6.85,
Ack n ow led gm en t. P.J .S. is grateful to the National
Science Foundation for a CAREER grant (No. CHE-
9502739) in support of this work. The establishment of
the Single-Crystal X-ray Dirffraction Laboratory at the
University of Idaho was supported by the NSF-Idaho
EPSCoR Program, the National Science Foundation,
and the M. J . Murdock Charitable Trust of Vancouver,
WA. We thank Prof. Roger Willett (Washington State
University) and Dr. Roland Fro¨hlich (Westfa¨lischen
Wilhelms Universita¨t, Mu¨nster) for examining and
commenting on the validity of the X-ray crystal struc-
ture of compound 1. We also thank Dr. Gary Knerr
(University of Idaho) for his assistance in acquiring
NMR data.
3
6.59 (d, J H-H ) 6.3 Hz, H5 and H6), 6.04 (s, PhCHCp), 5.06,
3.97 (d, 3J H-H ) 2.5 Hz, H2 and H3), 2.71, 2.22 (s, 4,7-CH3). 1H
NMR (C6D6; cis-meso isomer): δ 6.67, 6.37 (d, 3J H-H ) 6.5 Hz,
3
H5 and H6), 6.59 (s, PhCHCp), 4.68, 4.47 (d, J H-H ) 2.6 Hz,
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Details of the struc-
ture determinations for 1, trans-rac-2, and trans-rac-3, includ-
ing tables listing atomic coordinates, thermal parameters, and
bond distances and angles, figures showing structures, and
text giving details of the packing analysis. This material is
H2 and H3), 2.53, 1.92 (s, 4,7-CH3). 1H NMR (C6D6; third, minor
isomer (trans-meso or cis-rac): δ 5.09 (s, PhCHCp), 2.85, 2.57,
2.11, 2.03 (s, 4,7-CH3). 13C NMR (C6D6-d6): δ 129.2, 128.4,
128.2, 126.7 (Ph-C). 13C NMR (trans-rac isomer): δ 126.3,
121.4 (C5 and C6), 75.2, 68.2 (C2, C3), 58.7 (PhCHCp), 22.3,
18.3 (4,7-CH3). 13C NMR (cis-meso isomer): δ 124.8, 119.0 (C5
and C6), 73.6, 59.0 (C2, C3), 54.8 (PhCHCp) 21.1, 17.8 (4,7-
CH3). Anal. Calcd for C36H32Fe: C, 83.07; H, 6.20. Found: C,
83.49; H, 6.51.
OM980990L
(26) Blessing, R. H. Acta Crystallogr. 1995, A51, 33.
(27) Al´ıas, F. M.; Barlow, S.; Tudor, J . S.; O’Hare, D.; Perry, R. T.;
Nelson, J . M.; Manners, I. J . Organomet. Chem. 1997, 528, 47.
(28) Tudor, J .; Barlow, S.; Payne, B. R.; O’Hare, D.; Nguyen, P.;
Evans, C. E. B.; Manners, I. Organometallics 1999, 18, 2281.
X-r a y Cr ysta l Str u ctu r e Deter m in a tion s. For compound
1, a suitable crystal chosen from a batch grown from hot
ethanol was mounted on a pin with silicon grease, and the