1,4-additions or may be employed in asymmetric cyclo-
additions. Furthermore, this class of compounds has hardly
been explored in enantioselective catalysis and the highly
symmetric nature offers a critical test for any chiral catalyst.
Here we wish to report the use of the Cu(OTf)2-phosphor-
amidite (L*-1) system in the catalytic conjugate addition of
dialkylzinc reagents to several symmetric 4,4-disubstituted
cyclohexadienones resulting in a short route to optically
active cyclohexenones.
The 4,4-disubstituted cyclohexadienones are highly ver-
satile benzoquinone equivalents6 due to their multifunctional
nature. Several elegant methods have been reported to obtain
chiral synthons based on 4,4-disubstituted cyclohexadi-
enones; most of these approaches involve the temporary
conversion to tricyclic adducts which are obtained in optically
active form, either by diastereoselective [4 + 2]-cycloaddi-
tion using a chiral cyclopentadiene,7a via desymmetrization
of meso-tricycloadducts with the aid of lipase7b or by using
Rh(I)(BINAP) catalysis.7c
Conjugate additions reactions of for example alkyllithium
reagents,8a dimethylmalonate,8b and acyl-nickel complexes8c
to 4,4-disubstituted cyclohexadienones have been reported,
but none of these are catalytic or enantioselective. To our
knowledge the only catalytic enantioselective conjugate
addition to 4,4-disubstituted cyclohexa-2,5-dienones was
reported by Iwata et al.9 which involved Cu-catalyzed
addition of trimethylaluminum to afford 3,4,4,5-tetrameth-
ylcyclohex-2-enone with ee’s up to 68%.10
Scheme 1b). Will the chiral catalyst based on L*-1 be able
to distinguish Re/Si faces and pro-R/pro-S positions in these
highly symmetric dienones? Since the 4,4-disubstituted
cyclohexadienones can be easily prepared in one step from
the corresponding phenols10,11 Scheme 1 represents an
attractive route for the preparation of chiral multifunctional
synthons in just two steps from phenols.
To investigate the behavior of the novel catalytic system
in the conjugate addition of R2Zn to these cyclohexadienones
and the influence of the substituents on product ratio and
ee, cyclohexadienones 2-6 and 13-16 with different C-4
substituents were examined.
All reactions were performed under Ar on a 1 mmol scale
at -30 °C. The catalyst was prepared in situ by stirring 2.0
mol % of Cu(OTf)2 and 4 mol % of L*-1 in 5 mL of dry
toluene for 30 min and at -30 °C substrate (1.0 equiv) and
1.2 equiv of R2Zn were added sequentially. After 24 h, the
reaction mixture was quenched with water or diluted NH4-
Cl solution and the product was immediately extracted with
diethyl ether. Workup had to be performed fast to avoid
aromatization of the 1,4-adduct to the corresponding 3-alkyl-
4-alkoxy- or 3,4-dialkylphenols. After column chromatog-
raphy (SiO2, hexane/EtOAc, 5/1) the pure cyclohexenones
(7-12 and 17-20) were obtained. The results are sum-
marized in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1. Conjugate Addition of R2Zn to Symmetrical
Cyclohexadienones, Catalyzed by Cu(OTf)2-L*-1
Conjugate addition to symmetric dienones results in
desymmetrization of the prochiral dienone moiety (Scheme
1). Side selective addition affords a single stereocenter in
Scheme 1
yielda eeb
entry dienone
R1
Me
Et
-CH2CH2-
-CH2CH2CH2-
R1
Me
R
1,4-adduct
(%) (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
2
3
4
5
6
2
Et
Et
Et
Et
7
8
9
10
11
12
65
59
68
62
75
76
97
92
92
89
85
99
Et
-CH2C(Me)2CH2- Et
Me Me Me
a Isolated yield. b Ee values of 7-12 were determined by GC (see
Supporting Information); no 1,2-adducts were observed.
The conjugate addition of Et2Zn to cyclohexadienone
monoacetals with R1 ) R2 (2 and 3) proceeded with high
case the 4,4-substituents are equal, i.e., Re versus Si face
attack of the organometallic reagent (side selectivity; Scheme
1a). When the substituents at the 4-position are different, Si
or Re face selective attack gives rise to the formation of two
stereocenters in a single step (side and face selectivity;
(8) (a) Stern, A. J.; Rhode, J. J.; Swenton, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54,
4413. (b) Torii, S.; Hayashi, N.; Kuroboshi, M. Synlett 1998, 599. (c)
Semmelhack, M. F.; Keller, L.; Sato, T.; Spiess, E. J.; Wulff, W. J. Org.
Chem. 1985, 5567.
(9) Takemoto, Y.; Kuraoka, S.; Hamaue, N.; Iwata, C. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1996, 7, 993.
(6) Swenton, J. S. The chemistry of quinoid compounds; Rappoport, Z.,
Patai, S., Eds.; John Wiley: New York, 1988; Vol. 2, Part 2, p 899.
(7) (a) Jones, P. G.; Weinmann, H.; Winterfeldt, E. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 448. (b) Takano, S.; Moriya, M.; Higashi, Y.;
Ogasawara, K. Chem. Commun. 1993, 177. (c) Kamikubo, T.; Hiroya, K.;
Ogasawara, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 499.
(10) Diastereoselective conjugate additions of trimethylaluminum to [(p-
tolylsulfinyl)methyl]quinols have been reported: Pirrung M. C., Nunn D.
S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 1992.
(11) (a) Pelter, A.; Elgendy, S. M. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1993, 1891. (b) Tamura, Y.; Yakura, T.; Haruta, J.-I.; Kita, Y. J. Org. Chem.
1987, 52, 3927.
624
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 4, 1999