C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 2. Molecular structure of the diarene complex [ST4,NO]+ with all
hydrogens omitted for clarity.
Figure 3. Spectral changes upon the addition of nitric oxide to Ar2/oxidant
systems. [Dashed lines are before and solid lines are after NO addition.]
theoretically confirmed by the LCAO-MO description of the CT
complex showing maximum electronic (donor/acceptor) coupling
when Eoox(arene) ≈ Eored(NO+) ) 1.5 V vs SCE.4 Thus, the best
choice for nitrosonium/nitric oxide complexation based solely on
is completely reversible simply by NO entrainment with a mild air
stream or upon evacuation. We are presently also investigating a
(tunable) electrochemical sensor based on the same basic principle.
electronic factors lies with aromatic donors having Eo ≈ 1.5 V,
ox
and this requirement is satisfied by the diarenes (Table 1). Since
Figure 1 shows that the free-energy gain upon complex formation
is much higher with diarenes than those with monoarenes of
Acknowledgment. We thank S. V. Lindeman for crystallo-
graphic assistance, R. Rathore for providing some of the diarene
donors, and the R. A. Welch Foundation and National Science
Foundation for financial support
comparable Eo value, it is clear that structural factors must also
ox
be evaluated.
X-ray structural analysis reveals that a single molecule of nitric
oxide penetrates deeply within the rather narrow cleft formed by
two cofacial aromatic moieties.6 As a result, the diarene complexes
must be structurally akin to the [2:1] complexes II. However, Figure
1 shows that the free-energy gain in [2:1] complexes is substantially
less than that from the corresponding diarene complexes, and this
supports the importance of the chelate effectsas manifested both
in the enthalpy gain from multibond formation as well as an entropy
loss from one-ligand coordination.7 Moreover for maximum chelat-
ing effect, the binding of the multidentate ligand must also be
organized so that the coordinating (NO) center is encapsulated with
minimal (distortional) penalty (Figure 2). It is also significant that
NO lies within the undistorted calixarene complex [CAL,NO]+
equidistant from the cofacial aromatic planes at an optimal distance
of d ) 2.55 Å,6a as established by the X-ray structures of the [2:1]
complexes of toluene (d ) 2.5 Å) and o-xylene (d ) 2.6 Å).4b In
the other diarene complexes the two distances are nonequivalent,
indicating the second bond provides some additional free-energy
gain, but the rather rigid structure of the stilbenoid ligands (ST1-
4) as well as the dihydroanthracene analogue MEA do not allow
optimal placement of the aromatic ring for NO binding. [For
example, d ) 2.15 and 3.10 Å in [MEA,NO]+, d ) 2.24 and 2.70
Å in [ST1,NO]+, and d ) 2.15 and 2.90 Å in [ST4,NO]+ shown
in Figure 2. As a result CAL forms the most stable NO complex
(Table 1).
The enhanced formation constants of diarene complexes ensure
high sensitivity and specificity for NO binding. These together with
large extinction coefficients of the visible absorption bands allow
selective NO sensors to be designed on the basis of the coupled
equilibria in eq 2. For example, colorless (CH2Cl2) solutions of
either CAL or ST4 with some added oxidant (e.g., PbO2 or Et3-
OSbCl6) persist unchanged for prolonged periods.8 However,
immediately upon the exposure to nitric oxide (gas), the colorless
solutions take on an intense purple coloration (see left table of
contents graphic) diagnostic of the diarene complexes (Figure 3).
The same color change is observed in the solid state with a mull
prepared as an intimate mixture of CAL and PbO2. Exposure of
such a coated (pale gray) alumina plate to nitric oxide produces
the dramatic color change (see right table of contents graphic) which
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details together
with the X-ray crystallographic data and ORTEP diagrams for the [2:1]
complexes: [(toluene)2,NO]+SbCl6- and [(o-xylene)2,NO]+SbCl6- and
the diarene complexes [ST4,NO+]SbCl6 and [MEA,NO+]SbCl6
-
-
(PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) For some recent studies, see: (a) Laverman, L. E.; Ford, P. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11614. (b) Laverman, L. E.; Wanat, A.; Oszajca,
J.; Stochel, G.; Ford, P. C.; van Eldik, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
9780. (c) Wolak, M.; Zahl, A.; Schneppensieper, T.; Stochel, G.; van Eldik,
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 285. (d) Andersen, J. F.; Ding, X. D.;
Balfour C.; Shokhireva, T. K.; Champagne, D. E.; Walker, F. A.; Montfort,
W. R. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 10118. (e) Adachi, H.; Sonoki, H.; Hoshino,
M.; Wakasa, M.; Hayashi, H.; Miyazaki, Y. J. Phys. Chem. 2001, 105,
392.
(2) Compare: (a) Hoshino, M.; Laverman, L.; Ford, P. C. Coord. Chem. ReV.
1999, 187, 75. (b) Sellmann, D.; Blum, N.; Heinemann, F. W.; Hess, B.
A. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 1874.
(3) (a) Reents, W. D., Jr.; Freiser, B. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 271.
(b) Brownstein, S.; Gabe, E.; Lee, F.; Tan, L. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1984, 1566. (c) Brownstein, S.; Gabe, E.; Lee, F.; Piotrwski,
A. Can. J. Chem. 1986, 64, 1661. (d) Brownstein, S.; Gabe, E.; Louie,
B.; Piotrowski, A. Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 1661. (e) Kim, E. K.; Kochi,
J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4962. For a recent review, see:
Borodkin, G. I.; Shubin, V. G. Russ. Chem. ReV. (Engl. Transl.) 2001,
70, 211.
(4) (a) Rosokha, S. V.; Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8985. (b)
For experimental details and the X-ray structures of various II and III
complexes, see Supporting Information.
(5) Eo is the reversible oxidation potential of arene donors, and Eo the
ox
red
reduction potential of NO+.
(6) (a) Rathore, R.; Lindeman, S. V.; Rao, K. S.; Sun, D.; Kochi, J. K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2123. (b) Rathore, R.; Kochi, J. K. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 8630.
(7) For the thermodynamics of the chelate effect, see: Cotton, F. A.;
Wilkinson, G. AdVanced Inorganic Chemistry, 5th ed.; Wiley: New York,
1988.
(8) (a) Particularly in nonaqueous solutions. (b) Note that this procedure
circumvents the kinetic lability of arene cation radicals. (c) From the results
in Table 1 (eq 2), we estimate the intrinsic NO sensitivity to be ∼1 µM
on the basis of a spectrophotometric resolution of 0.01 in the optical
density; however, for a solid-state device the practical sensitivity will
depend on its design, particularly for application to an aqueous environment.
JA020217O
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 20, 2002 5621