3362 Organometallics, Vol. 18, No. 17, 1999
Albe´niz et al.
MeCH(Me)-), 2.01 (ddd, J ) 15.8, 5.9, 2.3 Hz, 1H, H6), 1.58
(m, J ) 12.5, 5.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H, H5′), 1.38 (ddd, J ) 15.8, 11.7,
5.7 Hz, 1H, H6′), 1.20 (b, 4H, Me, H,4 AB3 system), 1.19 (d, J
) 6.8 Hz, 3H, MeCH(Me)-), 1.18 (d, J ) 6.8 Hz, 3H, MeCH-
(Me)-). [RD]20 ) -45.4 (c ) 28 mg/mL in CHCl3).
case we found â-H elimination and decoordination
detrimental for our purposes. Otherwise the desired
route is faster than other possibly competing processes.
Con clu sion s
4cis:
1H NMR (300 MHz, δ, CDCl3), 3.75 (s, 1H, H1syn), 3.21
(s, 1H, H1anti), 2.02 (s, 3H, Me2), 1.2-2.4 (m, 9H, H,4 H,5 H,6
H,7 H8)*, 0.83 (d, J ) 6.3 Hz, 3H, Me6). *: overlapped with
other signals.
The results obtained show that the selective Pd-
migration produces an efficient face selection provided
there is a tertiary carbon in a cycle connecting a reactive
center inside and outside the cycle (a “gate”). For the
dienes used in this work we observe that, when the Pd
atom enters the cycle, an optically active Pd-cyclic allyl
is formed (complexes 3, 5, and 6); on the other hand
when Pd exits the cycle, the configuration of the tertiary
carbon (the “gate”) also brings about the steroselective
formation of an exocyclic allyl (complexes 4). The
addition of “PdHBr” is produced preferentially in the
less substituted double bond, and the allyl is formed in
the position of the most substituted olefin; in the
examples given this affords, as expected, an endocyclic
palladium allyl.
Syn th esis of 6. To a suspension of 1 (0.640 g, 0.7 mmol) in
CH2Cl2 (30 mL) was added (R)-(-)-carvone (0.44 mL, 2.8
mmol). The mixture was stirred for 26 h, and the solution was
filtered through activated carbon and evaporated to dryness.
The residue was chromatographed through silica (neutral),
eluting with n-hexane first (2), then n-hexane/ethyl acetate )
9:1 (7 and excess diene), and finally n-hexane/ethyl acetate )
1:1 (6). The last batch was evaporated to dryness, and the
residue was triturated with Et2O and then cooled. The yellow
solid (6) obtained was filtered, washed with Et2O, and air-dried
(0.24 g, 50% yield).
6: Anal. Calcd for C20H30O2Br2Pd2: C, 35.58; H, 4.47.
1
Found: C, 36.07; H, 4.53. H NMR (300 MHz, δ, CDCl3), 5.73
(d, J ) 6.7 Hz, 1H, H2), 5.07 (d, J ) 6.7 Hz, 1H, H3), 2.48 (m,
2H, H,4 H5), 1.75 (m, 1H, H7), 1.64 (s, 3H, Me1), 1.56 (m, 1H,
H5′), 0.89 (d, J ) 6.6 Hz, 3H, Me7), 0.86 (d, J ) 6.7 Hz, 3H,
Me7′). [RD]20) -205.48 (c ) 12.2 mg/mL in CHCl3).
Exp er im en ta l Section
1
Gen er a l Com m en ts. 19F, H, and 13C NMR spectra were
7: 1H NMR (300 MHz, δ, CDCl3), 7.03 (d, J ) 7.7 Hz, 1H,
H3), 6.72 (dd, J ) 7.7, 1.7 Hz, 1H, H4), 6.66 (d, J ) 1.7 Hz, 1H,
H6), 4.63 (s, 1H, OH), 2.82 (sep, J ) 6.9 Hz, 1H, H7), 2.21 (s,
3H, Me2), 1.22 (d, J ) 6.9 Hz, 6H, Me7); MS(EI) m/z (relative
intensity), 150 (M+, 42), 135 (100), 115 (12), 107 (56), 91 (39),
77 (23), 67 (8), 53 (12), 51 (9).
recorded on Bruker AC-300 and ARX-300 instruments. Chemi-
cal shifts are reported in δ units (parts per million, ppm)
downfield from Me4Si for 1H and from CFCl3 for 19F. Carbon
and hydrogen analyses were carried out on a Perkin-Elmer
2400 CHN elemental analyzer. Organic products were ana-
lyzed using a HP-5890 gas chromatographer connected to a
HP-5988 mass spectrometer at an ionizing voltage of 70 eV
using a quadrupole analyzer. Relative rotations were deter-
mined with a Perkin-Elmer 241 polarimeter in CHCl3 solution.
All solvents were dried and distilled before use by standard
methods. (R)-(+)-Limonene, (1R)-(+)-isolimonene, and (R)-
(-)-carvone were commercially available (Aldrich and Fluka).
[Pd2(µ-Br)2(η3-PfCH2CHPh)2] (1) was prepared as previously
reported.15
Syn th esis of th e η3-Allylp a lla d iu m Der iva tives. Syn -
t h esis of 3. To a suspension of 1 (0.300 g, 0.328 mmol) in
CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was added (R)-(+)-limonene (0.213 mL, 1.311
mmol). After 2 days the small amount of metallic palladium
formed was eliminated by filtration through activated carbon.
The yellow solution was evaporated, and the residue was
fractionated by column chromatography (silica, neutral), elut-
ing first with n-hexane and then with ether. The latter fraction
was evaporated to dryness, n-hexane was added to the residue,
and the mixture was cooled. A yellow solid 3 crystallized (0.142
g, 67% yield).
P r ep a r a tion of (1S,6S)-8. A solution of 3 (0.040 g, 0.062
mmol) in CH2Cl2 (6 mL) was mixed with another of NaOMe
(0.020 g, 0.372 mmol) in MeOH (4 mL). CO was bubbled
through the mixture for 15 min. Metallic palladium precipi-
tated, which was filtered through Celite. The resulting solution
was evaporated to dryness using a water pump to avoid losing
volatiles. The residue was extracted with ether. Solvent
evaporation gave a colorless oil (83% yield), which was a
mixture of (1R,6S)-8 and an unidentified methyl ester in a
ratio of 16:1.
1
(1S,6S)-8: H NMR (300 MHz, δ, CDCl3), 5.25 (m, J ) 2.3,
0.8 Hz, 1H, H2), 3.68 (s, 3H, COOMe), 3.04 (m, J ) 8.6, 2.3
Hz, 1H, H1), 1.90-2.05 (m, 2H, H,4 H4′), 1.78 (m, J ) 11, 8.6,
4.5, 2.5 Hz, 1H, H6), 1.72 (m, 1H, H5′), 1.67 (m, W1/2 ) 4.5 Hz,
3H, Me), 1.62 (m, J ) 6.8, 6.7, 2.5 Hz,1H, (Me)CHMe), 1.30
(m, J ) 13, 11, 6 Hz, 1H, H5), 0.92 (d, J ) 6.7 Hz, 3H, (Me)-
CHMe), 0.82 (d, J ) 6.8 Hz, 3H, (Me)CHMe); MS(EI) m/z
(relative intensity), 196 (M+, 6), 137 (36), 95 (32), 93 (44), 81
(100), 79 (29), 41 (24). [RD]20 ) -106.3 (94% purity, c ) 5.1
mg/mL in CHCl3).
3: Anal. Calcd for C20H34Br2Pd2: C 37.12, H 5.30. Found:
C 37.20, H 5.24. 1H NMR (300 MHz, δ, CDCl3), 5.30 (d, J )
6.5 Hz, 1H, H2), 4.89 (d, J ) 6.5 Hz, 1H, H3), 2.08 (ddd, J )
19.6, 11.2, 5.8 Hz, 1H, H6), 1.87 (dt, J ) 10.0, 5.4 Hz, 1H, H4),
1.79 (ddd, J ) 19.6, 5.0, 3.2 Hz, 1H, H6′), 1.64 (m, 2H, H,5 (Me)-
CHMe), 1.60 (s, 3H, Me), 0.92 (d, J ) 6.8 Hz, 3H, (Me)CHMe),
0.89 (d, J ) 6.8 Hz, 3H, (Me)CHMe), 0.77 (m, J ) 11.2, 10.0,
5.0 Hz, 1H, H5′); [RD]20 ) +130.3 (c ) 10 mg/mL in CHCl3).
P r ep a r a tion of (1R,6R)-9. It was prepared as described
for 6, using allylpalladium complex 5 as starting material.
Crude yield: 66%, a mixture of 9 and an unidentified methyl
ester in a 9:1 ratio.
(1R,6R)-9: 1H NMR (300 MHz, δ, CDCl3), 5.41 (m, J ) 3.6
Hz, 1H, H2), 3.67 (s, 3H, COOMe), 3.14 (m, J ) 5.0, 3.6 Hz,
1H, H1), 2.20 (sep., J ) 6.9 Hz, 1H, MeCH(Me)-), 2.05-2.15
(m, J ) 13.6, 5.0, 3.4 Hz, 1H, H6), 1.90-2.05 (m, J ) 18.4,
13.0, 6.2, 6.0, 2.0 Hz, 2H, H,4 H4′), 1.76 (m, J ) 16.0, 13.6, 6.2,
2.0 Hz, 1H, H5), 1.36 (m, J ) 16.0, 13.0, 6.0, 3.4 Hz, 1H, H5′),
1.01 (d, J ) 6.9 Hz, 6H, Me2CH-), 0.88 (d, J ) 7.0 Hz, 3H,
Me); MS(EI) m/z (relative intensity), 196 (M+, 4), 95(43), 93
(49), 81 (100), 79 (38), 43 (40), 41 (78). [RD]20 ) +56.4 (90%
purity, c ) 6.1 mg/mL in CHCl3).
Ca r bon yla tion of 6. CO was bubbled through a mixture
of complex 6 (0.04 g, 0.06 mmol) and NaOMe (0.019 g, 0.35
mmol) in CH2Cl2 (6 mL)/MeOH (4 mL). After 30 min, the black
suspension obtained was filtered through Celite and the
solvent was evaporated to dryness. The residue was extracted
4tr a n s
:
1H NMR (300 MHz, δ, CDCl3), 3.78 (s, 1H, H1syn),
3.25 (s, 1H, H1anti), 2.02 (s, 3H, Me2), 1.2-2.4 (m, 9H, H,4 H,5
H,6 H,7 H8)*, 0.80 (d, J ) 6.5 Hz, 3H, Me6). *: overlapped with
other signals.
Syn th esis of 5. It was prepared as described above for 3
but using (1R)-(+)-isolimonene instead of limonene. Crystal-
lization from n-hexane gave yellow solid 5 (28% yield).
5: Anal. Calcd for C20H34Br2Pd2: C, 37.12; H, 5.30. Found:
1
C, 37.22; H, 5.22. H NMR (300 MHz, δ, CDCl3), 5.25 (d, J )
7.0 Hz, 1H, H2), 4.74 (d, J ) 7.0 Hz, 1H, H3), 2.33 (m, J )
12.5, 11.7, 5.9 Hz, 1H, H5), 2.17 (sep., J ) 6.8 Hz, 1H,