858
Chemistry Letters Vol.35, No.8 (2006)
Coupling of Alkylarene and Pentamethyl[60]fullerene
by Iridium-catalyzed Benzylic C–H Bond Activation
Yutaka Matsuo,1 Akihiko Iwashita,2 and Eiichi NakamuraÃ1;2
1Nakamura Functional Carbon Cluster Project, ERATO, Japan Science and Technology Agency
2Department of Chemistry, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033
(Received May 22, 2006; CL-060598; E-mail: nakamura@chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp)
R
Br
H
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Heating of C60Me5Br in toluene in the presence of an iridi-
um catalyst and triethylamine results in benzylation of the full-
erene core to yield C60Me5CH2C6H5. The reaction is general
for various alkylarenes, and probably takes place via iridium-
catalyzed activation of a benzylic C–H bond.
Me
Me
Me
[IrCl(coe)2]2
(0.1 equiv.)
+
Et3N (1 equiv.)
toluene
80 °C, 2.5 h
1
2: R = Bn, 41%
3, 43%
Scheme 1.
Among popular topics of metal-catalyzed C–H bond activa-
tion,1 selective activation of one type of C–H bond over the oth-
ers is a relatively unexplored field of research. For instance, con-
version of an aromatic C–H bond into a C–C bond2 is a ubiqui-
tous reaction, but selective activation of a benzylic C–H bond in
an alkylarene compound in preference to other aromatic C–H
bonds in the same molecule is not an easy task.3 It is partly
due to a thermodynamic reason: The C–H bond activation of
the methyl group of toluene is a process usually thermodynami-
cally less favored than the aryl C–H bond activation at the meta-
and para-position.4 To achieve the selectivity, ideas of utilizing
steric effects to direct the catalyst toward activation of the meth-
yl group of toluene have been examined successfully,5 but the
extension of such approaches beyond toluene remains yet to
be investigated. Herein, we report alkylation of the cyclopenta-
diene moiety of pentamethyl[60]fullerene, C60Me5H,6 with an
alkylarene in the presence of an iridium catalyst. This transfor-
mation allows introduction of a variety of (alkyl)(aryl)methyl
groups to the carbon atom surrounded by the five methyl groups.
The method is complementary to previously reported methods of
alkylation of C60Me5H in that it allows introduction of a second-
ary benzylic group to the hindered position of the molecule.7
The new reaction was discovered in the course of attempted
synthesis of iridium–fullerene complexes. The first synthetic
approach to Ir(ꢀ5-C60Me5)(CO)2 relying on the reaction of
an anion, K(C60Me5), with [IrCl(CO)2]2 took place smoothly
to give the iridium–fullerene complex.8 A polarity-reversed
approach relying on the reaction of bromo(pentamethyl)[60]-
fullerene, C60Me5Br (1)9 with one equivalence of [IrCl(coe)2]2
(coe = cyclooctene) in toluene at 25 ꢀC for 120 h unexpectedly
gave benzyl(pentamethyl)[60]fullerene, C60Me5(CH2Ph) (2) in
33% yield (100% conversion of 1). Clearly, a C–H bond activa-
tion of the solvent molecule took place.10 The reaction afforded
C60Me5H (3, 50%) and several oxidized products such as
C60Me5O3H11 as by-products. We found that the reaction of 1
with 10 mol % of [IrCl(coe)2]2 in the presence of triethylamine
(1 equiv.) in toluene at 80 ꢀC for 2.5 h afforded 2 and 3 in 41
and 43% yield, respectively (Scheme 1 and Table 1, Entry 1).
Other bases were examined without success: e.g., pyridine and
1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene. No such benzylation reac-
tion was found in the same reaction of the more sterically hin-
dered molecule, C60Ph5H.
(a)
(b)
C8
C7
C2
C3
C4
C1
C5
C6
Figure 1. Crystal structure of 2. (a) ORTEP drawing with
30% probability level ellipsoids. (b) Space-filling models
˚
from top and side view. Selected bond length (A) and angles
(ꢀ): C1–C2 = 1.522(11), C2–C3 = 1.357(11), C3–C4 =
1.494(10), C4–C5 = 1.366(12), C5–C1 = 1.529(12), C1–
C7 = 1.592(12), C7–C8 = 1.511(13); C6–C1–C7 = 107.2(7),
C1–C7–C8 = 117.0(7).
HR-MS as well as X-ray crystallographic analysis.12 The 1H
and 13C NMR spectra exhibited signals characteristic of the Cs
symmetric structure. The ORTEP drawing and CPK models
are shown in Figure 1. Bond lengths of the top pentagon (C1
to C5) are in good agreement with an ordinary cyclopentadiene
structure. The bond distance between C1 and C7 (1.592(12) A)
is considerably longer than an ordinary C(sp3)–C(sp3) bond
˚
(1.54 A), likely due to steric hindrance.
As summarized in Table 1, a variety of arenes bearing alkyl
or substituted alkyl side chains (used as a solvent) have been
found to take part in the reaction albeit in poor to moderate yield.
The major product besides the desired one was the reduction
product 3. When mesitylene was used as a solvent, 3,5-dimethyl-
benzyl adduct of fullerene was obtained (Entry 2). The use of
ethylbenzene as a solvent resulted in introduction of a 1-phenyl-
ethyl group (C60Me5(CHMePh)) (Entry 3). The C–H bond
activation approach is a synthetically useful reaction, since the
synthesis of this compound by the conventional method by
using C60Me5K and an adequate halide is not a synthetically
viable reaction.
˚
4-Methoxytoluene and benzyl methyl ether are more reac-
tive than toluene and smoothly afforded the benzyl activation
The benzylated product 2 was characterized by NMR and
Copyright Ó 2006 The Chemical Society of Japan