8120
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8120-8121
Scheme 1
Assembly of Dynamic Heterometallic
Oligoporphyrins Using Cooperative Zinc-Nitrogen,
Ruthenium-Nitrogen, and Tin-Oxygen
Coordination
Hee-Joon Kim, Nick Bampos, and Jeremy K. M. Sanders*
UniVersity Chemical Laboratory, Lensfield Road,
Cambridge CB2 1EW, U.K.
ReceiVed May 11, 1999
The construction of supramolecular architectures1 through
noncovalent self-assembly has led to a resurgence of interest in
coordination chemistry. For example, the ligand coordination
properties of metalloporphyrins have resulted in a vast array of
supramolecular systems, such as, cyclic oligomers,2 linear oli-
gomers3 and polymers,4 squares,5 tapes,6 and other geometries.7
However, each of these constructions has employed only a single
type of metal-ligand interaction. This report describes what we
believe to be the first association under conditions of thermody-
namic reversibility of heterometallic porphyrin oligomers driven
by the synergistic coordination of at least two different metal-
loporphyrin building blocks designed to exhibit complementary
geometries and cooperative binding properties.
To achieve our goal, we chose Zn(II), Ru(II), and Sn(IV)
porphyrins for the contrast in their coordination chemistry. Zn
porphyrins prefer nitrogen donor ligands, adopt 5-coordinate
square pyramidal geometry, and are kinetically very labile, while
Ru(CO) porphyrins form stable and inert complexes with nitrogen
donor ligands and adopt 6-coordinate geometry. Sn(IV) porphy-
rins, on the other hand, prefer oxygen donor ligands, adopt
6-coordinate octahedral geometry, and exchange carboxylate
ligands rather slowly.8 When complementary binding functions
are introduced into appropriately designed Zn(II), Ru(II), and Sn-
(IV) porphyrins, it becomes possible to assemble multiple
components in a controlled manner.
For example, a two-component system can be readily envis-
aged: Zn porphyrin Zn-1 was designed with two carboxylic acid
groups for recognizing Sn(IV), while Sn(IV) porphyrin Sn-2
possesses a single pyridyl group for recognizing Zn, as shown in
Scheme 1.9 Zn-1 is obtained as a highly insoluble mixture of
interconverting cis and trans atropisomers, which, upon addition
of 1 equiv of Sn-2,10 are converted quantitatively (over 24 h due
to the insolubility) to the heterodimer [Sn-2/Zn-1] (Scheme 1).
The resonances of [Sn-2/Zn-1] are sharp and well resolved in
the 1H NMR spectrum, allowing assignment and characterization
by 2D NMR techniques (COSY, NOESY). The most diagnostic
signals are the pyridyl resonances which are sharp and shifted
significantly to higher field (∆δ HR -6.23 and Hâ -1.44 ppm).
Usually, resonances of pyridyl ligands bound to simple Zn
porphyrins are difficult to detect at room temperature as the ligand
undergoes fast exchange on the NMR time scale; however, for
[Sn-2/Zn-1] in the presence of excess Sn-2, slow exchange
between free and bound ligands on the NMR chemical shift time
scale allows observation of sharp coordinated ligand resonances.
Structurally diagnostic nOe connectivities between the sharp
pyridine ligand resonances of Sn-2 and the meso and the aryl
protons of the Zn porphyrin (pointing into the cavity) are also
observed in the NOESY spectrum of [Sn-2/Zn-1], confirming
the integrity of the Zn-pyridyl bond. These spectroscopic features
provide strong evidence for the intramolecular interaction between
the Zn porphyrin and the pyridine of the Sn porphyrin in [Sn-2/
Zn-1]. Furthermore, in a 2 mM solution of [Sn-2/Zn-1], displace-
ment of the intramolecularly bound Sn pyridine requires the
addition of more than 1000 equiv of neat pyridine. This suggests
that the effective molarity for the intramolecular Zn-N binding
event is more than 2 M.11 The Sn porphyrin unit becomes free to
rotate about the Sn-carboxylate bond, as indicated by the disap-
pearance of the upfield shifted R and â resonances of the pyridine
unit of [Sn-2/Zn-1]. When the solvent is removed by evaporation
and the residue reconstituted in pyridine-free CDCl3, the original
conformation of [Sn-2/Zn-1] is restored as confirmed by 1H NMR
spectroscopy, with the intramolecular Zn-pyridyl bond intact.
Recognition of the pyridyl group of Sn-2 by the Zn center of
Zn-1 is kinetically the first event in the assembly process, even
though the Zn-pyridyl binding affinity is significantly weaker than
that between the Sn porphyrin of Sn-2 and the carboxylate
component of Zn-1. The evidence for this is the observation that
(1) Lehn, J.-M., Ed.; Sauvage, J.-P., Hosseini, W., volume Eds. Compre-
hensiVe Supramolecular Chemistry; Pergamon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1996;
Vol. 9.
(2) (a) Salmon, L.; Bied-Charreton, C.; Gaudemer, A.; Moisy, P.; Bedioui,
F.; Devynck, J. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 2734. (b) Martensson, J.; Sandros,
K.; Wennerstrom, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 541. (c) Burrell, A. K.;
Officer, D. L.; Reid, D. C. W.; Wild, K. Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37,
114. (d) Kobuke, Y.; Miyaji, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4111. (e)
Stibrany, R. T.; Vasudevan, J.; Knapp, S.; Potenza, J. A.; Emege, T.; Schugar,
H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3980. (f) Sarson, L. D.; Ueda, K.; Takeuchi,
M.; Shinkai, S. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1996, 619. (g) Funatsu, K.;
Imamura, T.; Ichimura, A.; Sasaki, Y. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 1798. (h) Hunter,
C. A.; Sarson, L. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2313. (i) Drain,
C. M.; Russell, K. C.; Lehn, J. M. Chem. Commun. 1996, 337.
(3) (a) Kuroda, Y.; Kato, Y.; Ogoshi, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1997, 469. (b) Yuan, H. P.; Thomas, L.; Woo, L. K. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35,
2808. (c) Funatsu, K.; Kimura, A.; Imamura, T.; Ichimura, A.; Sasaki, Y.
Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 4986. (d) Chichak, K.; Branda, N. R. Chem. Commun.
1999, 523.
(4) (a) Fleischer, E. B.; Shachter, A. M. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 3763. (b)
Senge, M. O.; Smith, K. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 923. (c)
Kumar, R. K.; Balasubramanian, S.; Goldberg, I. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1998, 1435.
(5) (a) Stang, P. J.; Fan, J.; Olenyuk, B. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1997, 1453. (b) Slone, R. V.; Hupp, J. T. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 5422.
(6) Drain, C. M.; Nifiatis, F.; Vasenko, A.; Batteas, J. D. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2344.
(7) (a) Darling, S. L.; Mak, C. C.; Bampos, N.; Feeder, N.; Teat, S. J.;
Sanders, J. K. M. New J. Chem. 1999, 23, 359. (b) Chernook, A. V.; Rempel,
U.; von Borczyskowski, C.; Shulga, A. M.; Zenkevich, E. I. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1996, 254, 229. (c) Gerasimchuk, N, N.; Mokhir, A. A.; Rodgers, K. R.
Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 5641. (d) Hunter, C. A.; Hyde, R. K. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1936. (e) Kariya, N.; Imamura, T.; Sasaki, Y. Inorg.
Chem. 1998, 37, 1658. (f) Alessio, E.; Geremia, S.; Mestroni, S.; Iengo, E.;
Srnova, I.; Slouf, M. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 869. (g) Kariya, N.; Imamura,
T.; Sasaki, Y. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 833.
(9) The synthesis of Zn-1 and Sn-2 will be described elsewhere.
(10) All NMR experiments were performed at 2-5 mM concentration.
(11) Anderson, H. L.; Anderson, S.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1995, 2231.
(8) Hawley, J. C.; Bampos, N.; Abraham, R. J.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 661.
10.1021/ja9915652 CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/19/1999