8108
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8108-8109
Scheme 1
Langmuir Film Polymerization of
1,22-Bis(2-aminophenyl)docosane: A
Two-Dimensional Cross-linked Polyalkylaniline
L. J. Kloeppner and R. S. Duran*
Center for Macromolecular Science and Engineering
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Florida
GainesVille, Florida 32611
ReceiVed January 14, 1999
Ultrathin films have been proposed for many applications such
as in nonlinear optical1-5 and electroluminescent devices6,7 and
sensors.8,9 However, most applications require the films to be
mechanically, thermally, and chemically stable under environ-
mental conditions, which is often difficult to achieve. Polymeric
systems are usually more stable than low molar mass analogues
due to covalent bonding in the film plane and are often preferred.10
Further, network polymers in 3-dimensions are generally more
stable to thermal and physical stress than their non-cross-linked
counterparts, and therefore, free-standing monolayers of this type
should also have improved stability. Though the potential for these
types of films is great, there are few published reports that deal
with Langmuir films that form 2-dimensional network poly-
mers.11-15 Self-assembled organic monolayers on solid substrates
show some of these characteristics, but require specific substrates
and therefore cannot be a general method to produce stable, free-
standing films.16-18
(i) TsCl, pyridine, and CHCl3; (ii) LiBr, acetone, and heat; (iii) PPh3
CH3CN, and heat; (iv) potassium tert-butoxide, 2-nitrobenzaldehyde, and
THF; (v) H2, 10% Pd on carbon, and 95% ethanol.
This communication presents the Langmuir film polymerization
of a dipolar monomer, 1,22-bis(2-aminophenyl)docosane (BAD),
which forms a 2-dimensional network polymer of polyalkylaniline.
The surface behavior of BAD is presented and compared with
that of the monopolar surfactant, 2-pentadecylaniline (PDA),
which is routinely polymerized in Langmuir films.19-21
(1) Nalwa, H. S. AdV. Mater. 1993, 5, 341.
(2) Hodge, P.; Ali-Adib, Z.; West, D.; King, T. Macromolecules 1993, 26,
6, 1789.
(3) Bosshard, C.; Otomo, A.; Stegeman, G. I.; Ku¨pfer, M.; Flo¨rsheimer,
M.; Gu¨nter, P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1994, 64, 2076.
(4) Eaglesham, A.; Jaworek, T.; Cresswell, J.; Allen, S.; Burgess, A.;
Ferguson, I.; Ryan, T. G.; Hutchings, M.; Petty, M. C.; Yarwood, Y. Langmuir
1996, 12, 2292.
(5) Srikhirin, T.; Mann, J. A., Jr.; Lando, J. B. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem.
Ed. 1999, 37, 1057.
Figure 1. Surface pressure (π) vs mean molecular area (A) isotherms of
BAD and PDA on 0.01 M H2SO4 at 25 °C.
(6) Pavier, M. A.; Weaver, M. S.; Lidzey, D.; Richardson, T.; Searle, T.
M.; Bradley, D. D. C.; Huang, C. H.; Li, H.; Zhou, D. Thin Solid Films 1996,
284-285, 644.
Scheme 1 shows the synthetic route by which BAD was
prepared. In this route, two molecules of 1-(2-nitrophenyl)-1,11-
dodecadiene were coupled at the terminal olefin by a metathesis
reaction using a ruthenium alkylidene catalyst.22 1H NMR studies
of this coupling reaction suggest that this self-metathesis reaction
occurs selectively at the terminal olefin and not at the olefin next
to the aromatic ring. PDA was synthesized by a route previously
reported.19
The surface pressure (π) vs mean molecular area (A) isotherms
of BAD and PDA on a 0.10 M H2SO4 subphase had pressure
onset areas at ca. 150 and 74 Å2 molecule-1, respectively (Figure
1). As expected, the pressure onset area of BAD was about twice
that of the PDA, indicating that both of the anilinium groups were
adsorbed to the interface with the long chain oriented away from
the surface. Isobaric creep experiments of the monomers showed
that the BAD film was more stable over time than PDA under
similar conditions. For example, at a surface pressure of 15 mN
m-1, the monolayer film of BAD crept ca. 0.048 Å2 anilinium
(7) Onoda, M.; Yamaue, T.; Tada, K.; Kawai, T.; Yoshino, K. Synth. Met.
1997, 84, 983.
(8) Nomura, T.; Takebayashi, M.; Saitoh, A. IEEE Trans. Ultrason.,
Ferroelect., Freq. Control 1998, 45, 1261.
(9) Di Natale, C.; Paolesse, R.; Macagnano, A.; Troitsky, V. I.; Berzina,
T. S.; D’Amico, A. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 384, 249.
(10) Fuchs, H.; Ohst, H.; Prass, W. AdV. Mater. 1991, 3, 10.
(11) Steitz, R.; Peterson, I. R.; Voigt-Martin, I.; Mo¨hwald, H. Thin Solid
Films 1989, 178, 289.
(12) Dubault, C.; Casagrande, M.; Veyssie, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1975, 79,
2254.
(13) Rosilio, C.; Ruaudel-Teixier, A. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed. 1975,
13, 2459.
(14) Emmerling, W. N.; Pfannemu¨ller, B. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1983 261,
677.
(15) Porteu, F.; Palacin, S.; Ruaudel-Teizier, A.; Barraud, A. Makromol.
Chem., Macromol. Symp. 1991, 46, 37.
(16) Bain, C. D.; Whitesides, G. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1989,
28, 506.
(17) Ulman, A. An Introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films; Academic
Press: Boston, 1991.
(18) Ulman, A. Characterization of Organic Thin Films; Butterworth-
Heinemann: Boston, 1995.
(19) Kloeppner, L. J.; Duran, R. S. Langmuir 1998, 14, 6734.
(20) Zhou, H.; Stern, R.; Batich, C.; Duran, R. S. Makromol. Chem., Rapid
Commun. 1990, 11, 409.
(22) Schwab, P.; France, M. B.; Ziller, J. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2039.
(21) Bodalia, R. R.; Duran, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11467.
10.1021/ja990142x CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/18/1999