(1a) based upon the addition of phenyllithium to a protected
2-deoxy-D-ribono-1,4-lactone followed by stereoselective
reduction of the resulting hemiketal.6 This result demon-
strated that approaches used for syntheses of aryl ribofura-
noses7 could be applied to the efficient and stereoselective
synthesis of a â-aryl 2-deoxyribofuranose. Significantly, this
method utilizes an easily prepared, shelf-stable precursor.
The modification of this methodology to produce a general
synthesis of other aryl C-nucleosides is reported in this Letter.
Initial efforts focused on the addition of several aryllithium
reagents to the 3,5-di-O-TBDMS ether of 2-deoxy-D-ribono-
1,4-lactone (2a) used previously (Scheme 1).6 Unexpectedly,
Scheme 2
Scheme 1
this reaction proved to be very sensitive to substitution on
the aryllithium reagent. For example, reactions of 2a with
4-tolyllithium, 3-tolyllithium, or 2-naphthyllithium followed
by treatment with Et3SiH/BF3‚OEt2 produced significantly
diminished yields of the C-nucleosides (10, 8, and 16%,
respectively). Aryllithiums with substitution adjacent to the
carbanion (2-tolyllithium and 1-naphthyllithium) produced
none of the desired product. Because the desired C-
nucleosides and unreacted starting material were the only
products isolated, it appeared that the addition of the
aryllithium reagent was the problematic step. It was postu-
lated that the O-protecting groups hindered the approach of
the aryllithium reagents toward the lactone carbonyl carbon.
Although these groups appear remote to the reactive site,
the trajectory of the aryllithium reagent must bring it directly
over the furanose ring during the course of the reaction. It
appears likely that the TBDMS groups are large enough to
sterically hinder this approach. One possible means to reduce
the steric influence of these groups is to restrict their motion
by imposing a cyclic structure. The bifunctional disiloxane
protecting group introduced by Markiewicz8 is suitable for
this purpose, and the cyclic 5′,3′-disiloxane derivatives of
nucleosides are well-known compounds. Synthesis of the
required deoxyribonolactone disiloxane (2b) was accom-
plished in two steps (Scheme 2). First, oxidation of 2-deoxy-
D-ribose by aqueous bromine generates the corresponding
2-deoxy-D-ribono-1,4-lactone. Reaction of this crude product
with 1,3-dichloro-1,1,3,3-tetraisopropyldisiloxane and imi-
dazole produces the protected 2-deoxy-D-ribono-1,4-lactone
in excellent overall yields (g85%) on a multigram scale.
Conversion of the 2-deoxy-D-ribono-1,4-lactone to the aryl
C-nucleosides was attempted using the procedure previously
employed by this laboratory.6 Thus, aryllithium reagents were
added to a solution of lactone 2b at -78 °C (Scheme 2).
The reaction was maintained at low temperature for an hour,
when it was quenched. The crude products, which presum-
ably include both diastereomeric hemiketals and the keto
alcohols, were treated at -78 °C with Et3SiH in the presence
of a strong Lewis acid. This produces the corresponding
C-nucleosides 3a-g in higher yields than were observed with
the TBDMS-protected starting material. Moreover, the reac-
tion proved less sensitive to the nature of the aryllithium
reagent, producing moderate yields of products even with
sterically hindered reagents such as 1-naphthyllithium and
2-tolyllithium (Table 1).
One drawback to the use of the disiloxane protecting group
is the observed formation of some of the R-diastereomer.
Table 1. Yields and â:R Ratios of 3a-g from the Reaction of
ArLi with 2b Followed by Reduction with Et3SiH/BF3‚OEt2
(6) Wichai, U.; Woski, S. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 3465.
(7) (a) Matulic-Adamic, J.; Beigelman, L.; Portmann, S.; Egli, M.;
Usman, N. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3909. (b) Matulic-Adamic, J.;
Beigelman, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 203. (c) Matulic-Adamic, J.;
Beigelman, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1669.
(8) Markiewicz, W. T. J. Chem. Res, Synop. 1979, 24.
1174
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 8, 1999