thank Dr S. Donadio (Vicuron Pharmaceuticals, Milan, Italy) for
the provision of a sample of ramoplanin.
Notes and references
1 T. D. H. Bugg, in Comprehensive Natural Products Chemistry, ed. M.
Pinto, Elsevier, Oxford, 1999, vol. 3, p. 241.
2 (a) E. A. Somner and P. E. Reynolds, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,
1990, 34, 413; (b) P. E. Reynolds and E. A. Somner, Drugs Exptl. Clin.
Res., 1990, 16, 385.
Fig. 2 Progress of MurG catalysed reaction upon addition of 3.0 mg MurG
to 3.0 mM dansyl lipid I and 2.7 mM 1.
3 S. Ha, D. Walker, Y. Shi and S. Walker, Protein Sci., 2000, 9, 1045.
4 S. Ha, E. Chang, M. C. Lo, H. B. Men, P. Park, M. Ge and S. Walker,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 8415.
5 L. Chen, H. B. Men, S. Ha, X. Y. Ye, L. Brunner, Y. N. Hu and S.
Walker, Biochemistry, 2002, 41, 6824.
6 G. Auger, J. van Heijenoort, D. Mengin-Lecreulx and D. Blanot, FEMS
Microbiol. Lett., 2003, 219, 115.
7 H. Liu, T. K. Ritter, R. Sadamoto, P. S. Sears, M. Wu and C.-H. Wong,
ChemBioChem, 2003, 4, 603.
8 R. P. Haughland, Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research
Chemicals, 6th Edn., Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA, 1996, p.
46.
9 P. E. Brandish, M. K. Burnham, J. T. Lonsdale, R. Southgate, M. Inukai
and T. D. H. Bugg, J. Biol. Chem., 1996, 271, 7609.
10 T. Yamazaki, C. D. Warren, A. Herscovics and R. W. Jeanloz, Can. J.
Chem., 1981, 59, 2247.
Fig. 3 Relative rate of increase in fluorescence against enzyme concen-
tration.
Lineweaver–Burk plot. The measured Km value for 1 was 0.06 mM,
much lower than the reported Km value for unmodified UDP-
GlcNAc (58 mM4), in which case radiochemical assay was used.
The measured kcat value was 153 Fl units/mg protein/min.
Measurement of UDP release using the coupled assay gave a rate of
turnover of 0.025 mmoles/mg protein/min. Fluorescence changes
could be totally inhibited by 20 mM ramoplanin, and 40% inhibited
by 0.02 mM ramoplanin.
A number of other detergents were examined for activity in this
assay. Fluorescence changes were only observed using zwitterionic
detergents (CHAPS, SB3–10), at detergent concentrations below
the critical micellar concentration (CMC). Therefore it appears that
the reaction is not taking place in a detergent micelle, but that
probably the low concentration of detergent is required to solubilise
the lipid I substrate.
In conclusion, UDP-GlcNAc was successfully modified through
the C-6 position with a fluorescent label. Assays with E. coli MurG
have shown that the enzyme can accept the modified UDP-GlcNAc
as substrate, and energy transfer is observed under certain
conditions with a dansyl-labelled lipid I substrate. To our
knowledge, this is the first direct continuous fluorescence assay for
MurG.15 The availability of fluorescently modified UDP-GlcNAc
will enable fluorescent assays to be established for other glycosyl-
transferases that use UDP-GlcNAc.
We would like to thank GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals for
financial support, and Dr M. Burnham and Dr K. O’Dwyer for
helpful comments. We thank Professor S. Walker for the provision
of expression construct pET3a carrying the murG gene, and we
11 T. Pouyani and G. D. Prestwich, Bioconjugate Chem., 1994, 5, 339.
12 Auger et al. and Chen et al. found lipid I bearing a C55 prenyl chain is
a poor substrate for MurG. See refs. 5 and 6.
13 J. S. Anderson, M. Matsuhashi, M. A. Haskin and J. L. Strominger, J.
Biol. Chem., 1967, 242, 3180.
14 The fluorescent analogues of UDP-GlcNAc 1 and 2 were characterised
by 1H NMR and MS. 1, dH (400 MHz, D2O), 7.75 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz,
H-6 uracil), 7.61 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, H-4 indole), 7.47 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz,
H-7 indole), 7.32 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 7.21 (dd, 1H, J = 7.3, 7.0 Hz, H-6
indole), 7.13 (dd, J = 7.1, 7.0 Hz, H-5 indole), 5.82 (d, 1H, J = 3.5 Hz,
H-1 ribose), 5.81 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz, H-5 uracil), 5.51 (dd, 1H, JPH
=
7.4 Hz, JHH = 3.2 Hz, H-1 hexose), 4.38 (d, 1H, J = 10.0 Hz, H-5
hexose), 4.17 (m, 2H, H-2, 3 ribose), 4.11 (m, 2H, H-5a, 5b ribose), 4.06
(m, 1H, H-4 ribose), 4.01 (dt, 1H, J = 10.3, 3.0 Hz, H-2 hexose), 3.82
(s, 2H, CH2-indole), 3.81 (t, 1H, J = 9.8 Hz, H-3 hexose), 3.70 (t, 1H,
J = 9.4 Hz, H-4 hexose), 2.03 (s, 3H, NAc). ESI-MS (M 2 1) 791.16,
expected 792.14; 2, dH (400 MHz, D2O), 7.85 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, H-6
uracil), 7.59 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-4 indole), 7.45 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz,
H-7 indole), 7.30 (s, 1H, H-2 indole), 7.20 (dd, 1H, J = 7.0, 7.0 Hz, H-6
indole), 7.12 (dd, 1H, J = 7.8, 7.0 Hz, H-5 indole), 5.87 (d, 1H, J = 4.2
Hz, H-1 ribose), 5.85 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, H-5 uracil), 5.51 (dd, 1H, JPH
= 7.3, JHH = 3.0 Hz, H-1 hexose), 4.36 (d, 1H, J = 9.8 Hz, H-5
hexose), 4.26 (m, 2H, H-2, 3 ribose), 4.20 (m, 2H, H-5a, 5b ribose), 4.12
(m, 1H, H-4 ribose), 4.00 (dt, 1H, J = 10.5, 3.0 Hz, H-2 hexose), 3.80
(t, 1H, J = 9.7 Hz, H-3 hexose), 3.79 (s, 2H, CH2-indole), 3.69 (t, 1H,
J = 9.5 Hz, H-4 hexose), 2.31–2.25 (m, 4H, CH2CH2CH2CH2), 2.01 (s,
3H, NAc), 1.62–1.57 (m, 4H, CH2CH2CH2CH2). ESI-MS (M 2 1)
933.25, expected 934.21.
15 During the preparation of this manuscript, a fluorescent binding assay
for MurG has been published. See: J. S. Ham, Y. Hu, L. Chen, B. Gross
and S. Walker, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 11168.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 8 2 – 1 8 3
183