1874
C. Mukai et al.
SHORT PAPER
13C NMR: d = 19.59, 23.58, 28.99, 33.25, 34.11, 64.57, 107.40,
at the same temperature for 1 h. Co2(CO)8 (6.0 mmol) and Et3N (5.0
mmol) were added to the mixture at r.t. The mixture was then treat-
ed as described for condition A. In the cases of 18 and 21, the result-
ing mixture of carbonyl compound and nitrile derivative was
dissolved in MeOH (50 mL), to which NaBH4 (15 mmol) was add-
ed. The mixture was stirred for 2 h at 0 °C, and MeOH was evapo-
rated off. The residue was diluted with H2O and extracted with
EtOAc. The extract was washed with water and brine, dried, and
concentrated to dryness. Chromatography of the residue with
EtOAc/hexane afforded the corresponding alcohol and nitrile com-
pounds.
166.31, 168.73.
MS (EI): m/z (%) = 213 (M+, 5), 154 (100), 126 (47), 99 (99), 82
(35).
Anal. calcd for C10H15NO4: C, 56.33; H, 7.09; N, 6.57. Found: C,
56.21; H, 7.25; N, 6.53.
4-Phenylcyclohexanone N-Methylhydrazone (25)
A solution of 2 (870 mg, 5.0 mmol), N-methylhydrazine (0.40 mL,
7.5 mmol), and Na2SO4 (5.0 g) in dry CH2Cl2 (30 mL) was heated
under reflux for 3 h. After cooling, the mixture was concentrated to
leave the residual oil, which was passed through a short pad of
Celite with EtOAc to give 25 as a colorless oil; yield: 970 mg
(96%).
References
(1) Green, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in Organic
Synthesis; Wiley: New York; 1991, p 214.
(2) (a) Just, G.; Dahl, K. Can. J. Chem. 1970, 48, 966.
(b) Corey, E. J.; Richman, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92,
5276.
IR (CHCl3): n = 1632, 3309 cm-1.
1H NMR: d = 1.83–1.55 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.91 (dt, 1H, J = 13.9, 5.0
Hz, CH2), 2.13–1.99 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.32 (dt, 1H, J = 13.9, 5.0 Hz,
CH2), 2.54 (m, 1H, C4-H), 2.90–2.71 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.93 (s, 3H,
NMe), 7.35–7.16 (m, 5H, Ar-H).
13C NMR: d = 24.93, 32.92, 33.93, 34.14, 35.15, 38.22, 41.33,
43.70, 126.24, 126.70, 128.43, 145.95, 151.91.
(c) Araujo, H. C.; Ferreira, G. A. L.; Mahajan, J. R. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1974, 2257.
(d) Maloney, J. R.; Lyle, R. E.; Saavedra, J. E.; Lyle, G. G.
Synthesis 1978, 212.
(e) Corey, E. J.; Hopkins, P. B.; Kim, S.; Yoo, S.; Nambiar, K.
P.; Falck, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 7131.
(f) Drabowicz, J. Synthesis 1980, 125.
(g) Donaldson, R. E.; Saddler, J. C.; Byrn, S.; Mckenzie, A.
T.; Fuchs, P. L. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2167.
(h) Rao, C. G.; Radhakrishna, A. H.; Singh, B. B.; Bhatnagar,
S. P. Synthesis 1983, 808.
(i) Curran, D. P.; Brill, J. F.; Rakiewicz, D. M. J. Org. Chem.
1984, 49, 1654.
(j) Nitta, M.; Sasaki, I.; Miyano, H.; Kobayashi, T. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1984, 57, 3357.
(k) Aizpurua, J. M.; Juaristi, M.; Lecea, B.; Palomo, C.
Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 2903.
(l) Laszlo, P.; Polla, E. Synthesis 1985, 439.
(m) Shim, S. B.; Kim, K.; Kim, Y. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987,
28, 645.
MS (EI): m/z (%) = 202 (M+, 10), 174 (100), 145 (17), 130 (14), 117
(64), 104 (88), 91 (89), 70 (37).
HRMS: m/z calcd for C13H18N2:202.1470, found 202.1473.
4-Phenylcyclohexanone N-Phenylhydrazone (26)
A solution of 2 (1.7 g, 9.8 mmol) and phenylhydrazine (1.1 mL, 11
mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (50 mL) was stirred in the presence of molec-
ular sieves 4Å (150 mg) at r.t. for 12 h. The mixture was concentrat-
ed to leave the residual solids, which were recrystallized, from
EtOAc/hexane to afford 26 as yellow crystals; yield: 1.2 g (47%).
IR (CHCl3): n = 3365 cm-1.
1H NMR: d = 2.27–1.87 (m, 8H, CH2), 2.73 (m, 1H, C4-H), 7.37–
7.18 (m, 5H, Ar-H), 7.54–7.46 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.80–7.71 (m, 2H,
Ar-H), 9.51 (s, 1H, NH).
13C NMR: d = 29.02, 30.28, 33.95, 41.35, 43.34, 103.68, 122.52,
126.20, 126.65, 128.32, 128.41, 128.59, 129.13, 131.32, 146.47,
150.94.
MS (EI): m/z (%) = 264 (M+, 3), 174 (100), 119 (59), 104 (86), 91
(71), 78 (43).
(n) Ranu, B. C.; Sarkar, D. C. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 878.
(o) Ballini, R.; Petrini, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1 1988,
2563.
(p) Olah, G. A.; Liao, Q.; Lee, C. S.; Prakash, G. K. S. Synlett
1993, 427.
(q) Shinada, T.; Yoshihara, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
6701.
HRMS: m/z calcd for C18H20N2:264.1627, found 264.1629.
(r) Boruah, A.; Baruah, B.; Prajapati, D.; Sandhu, J. S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 4267.
(s) Bose, D. S.; Srinivas, P. Synlett 1998, 977.
(t) Chaudhari, S. S.; Akamanchi, K. G. Synthesis 1999, 760.
(3) Mukai, C.; Hanaoka, M. Synlett 1996, 11 and references cited
therein.
(4) The desired 2 could be isolated without exposing to H2O.
However, the yield of 2 was rather low compared to entry 1 in
the Table.
(5) Treatment of 18 with Co2(CO)8 gave an inseparable mixture
of 1-naphthaldehyde and 1-naphthonitrile (20).
(6) In the case of 22, 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde (23) and
3,4,5-trimethoxybenzonitrile (24) could be isolated by column
chromatography.
General Procedure for the Regeneration of Carbonyl Function-
ality
Condition A
To a solution of oxime O-acetate or hydrazone derivatives (5.0
mmol) in Et2O (50 mL) were successively added Co2(CO)8 (5.0
mmol) and Et3N (5.0 mmol) at r.t. The mixture was stirred for 15
min at r.t., and the solvent was evaporated off. The residue was dis-
solved in a combined solvent (50 mL) of H2O and MeOH in a ratio
of 1:2. The mixture was stirred for 30 min at r.t., diluted with H2O,
and extracted with EtOAc. The extract was washed with water and
brine, dried, and concentrated to dryness. Chromatography of the
residue with EtOAc/hexane afforded the corresponding carbonyl
compounds.
Condition B
Article Identifier:
To a solution of oxime (5.0 mmol) in Et2O (50 mL) was added AcCl
(6.0 mmol) and Et3N (5.0 mmol) at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred
1437-210X,E;1999,0,11,1872,1874,ftx,en;F03899SS.pdf
Synthesis 1999, No. 11, 1872–1874 ISSN 0039-7881 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York