P. Ferraboschi et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 10 (1999) 2639–2642
2641
the unsaturated alcohol 1d that could not be transformed into the corresponding saturated alkanol 2d.5a
It should also be noted that compound 2d could not be obtained in an enantiomerically pure form by the
enzymatic resolution of (RS)-1d. In fact, the Pseudomonas cepacia lipase-catalyzed transesterification
afforded a nearly racemic product under the same conditions that allowed a highly enantioselective
resolution of a long series of similar 2-methyl-1-alkanols.16 In conclusion, we have shown that substrates
containing a methylene moiety such as the acetals 8a–c are nicely biohydrogenated to the corresponding
saturated compounds, i.e. 2-methyl alkanols 2a–c, faster than the alcohols (2–4 versus 14 days). Finally,
results from the acetal 8d show that the biotransformation may be successful even in the case where the
corresponding alcohol fails to react.
Acknowledgements
This work has been financially supported by Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca Scientifica
(Fondi MURST ex-40%) and Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR, Target Project in Bio-
technology).
References
1. (a) Azerad, R. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1995, 132, 17–51. (b) Roberts, S. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 157–169.
2. Microbial Reagents in Organic Synthesis; Servi, S., Ed.; Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, 1992; Vol. 381.
3. For recent reviews on synthetic capacities of baker’s yeast, see: D’Arrigo, P.; Högberg, H.-E.; Pedrocchi-Fantoni, G.; Servi,
S. Biocatalysis 1994, 9, 299–312.
4. D’Arrigo, P.; Pedrocchi-Fantoni, G.; Servi, S. Advances in Applied Microbiology 1997, 44, 81–123.
5. (a) Ferraboschi, P.; Casati, S.; Santaniello, E. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 19–20. (b) Ferraboschi, P.; Reza-Elahi, S.;
Verza, E.; Meroni Rivolta, F.; Santaniello, E. Synlett 1996, 1176–1178.
6. (a) Gramatica, P.; Manitto, P.; Ranzi, B. M.; Delbianco, A.; Francavilla, M. Experientia 1982, 38, 775–777. (b) Fuganti,
C.; Serra, S.; Duilio, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 279–282.
7. Fuganti, C.; Grasselli, P.; Seneci, P. F.; Casati, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1988, 3061–3065.
8. Ferraboschi, P.; Grisenti, P.; Casati, R.; Fiecchi, A.; Santaniello, E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1987, 1743–1748.
9. (a) Leuenberger, H. G. W.; Boguth, W.; Barner, R.; Schmid, M.; Zell, R. Helv. Chim. Acta 1979, 455–463. (b) Ferraboschi,
P.; Fiecchi, A.; Grisenti, P.; Santaniello, E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1987, 1749–1752.
10. The alcohols 1a and 1b were prepared according to Ref. 5a; the synthesis of alcohol 1c was carried out as described in
Ref. 5b. Oxidation to the aldehydes 7a–c with MnO2 in chloroform at room temperature (16 h) gave 55–65% of isolated
products. Reaction of the aldehydes with trimethyl orthoformate in methanol in the presence of NH4Cl at reflux overnight
afforded the acetals 8a–c (73–83% of isolated products).
11. The biohydrogenation of aldehydes 7 and acetals 8 constantly afforded variable amounts of the unsaturated alcohols 1 that
are the products of bioreduction of the substrates and require longer times (14 days, see Ref. 5a) for their biohydrogenation
to the alcohols 2. Prolonged incubation with fermenting baker’s yeast leads also to the formation of the saturated acids.
This oxidative mechanism of baker’s yeast has already been observed for other substrates, see: Sato, T.; Hanayama, K.;
Fujisawa, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 2197–2200.
12. Typically, to a solution of sucrose (15.4 g) in water (280 ml) baker’s yeast (31 g) was added. The suspension was kept
at 30°C, under vigorous stirring (0.5 h), then a solution of 8a (0.3 g, 1.56 mmol) in ethanol (3 ml) was added over 3
days (five additions). The reaction progress was monitored by GLC (HP-5, oven temperature 130°C). The mixture was
filtered through a Celite pad; the aqueous solution was extracted with diethyl ether (3×100 ml) and after usual work-up,
the alcohol 2a (0.14 g, 60%) was obtained from silica gel column chromatography (1/20) by elution with hexane/ethyl
acetate (7/3).
13. The stereochemical outcome is the same for all three substrates, the difference in the configuration being only a
consequence of the priorities of the groups.