H2 Evolution by Ni(I) Protonation Reactions
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 35, No. 14, 1996 4149
commercial samples and were not purified further. The compounds
2-(diphenylphosphino)ethanethiol18 (psh), and [Ni(NS3tBu)H](BPh4)19
tBu
(NS3 ) tris[(tert-butylthio)ethyl]amine) were prepared by literature
methods. Solvents were dried by standard methods and thoroughly
degassed prior to use.
Bis(5-(diphenylphosphino)-3-thiapentanyl)amine (psnet). A solu-
tion of Na(psh), prepared from 0.55 g (23.9 mmol) of sodium and 5.88
g (23.9 mmol) of psh in 100 mL of ethanol, was added dropwise to a
solution of 2.13 g (11.9 mmol) of bis(2-chloroethyl)amine (generated
from the hydrochloride with NaOEt) in 100 mL of ethanol at 0 °C.
The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature with
stirring and was stirred for an additional 12 h, during which time a
white precipitate formed. The mixture was filtered, and the filtrate
was concentrated in vacuo. The resulting white paste was dissolved
in toluene to remove residual NaCl, the mixture was filtered, and the
filtrate was taken to dryness in vacuo. The product was obtained as
5.5 g (82%) of a sticky white solid; analytical data indicate an ethanol
Figure 1. Minimal scheme for the nickel-mediated reaction 2H+
+
2e- a H2. B is a neighboring base; if the scheme were to be related
to hydrogenase, the Ni-C designation would best apply to 3 or 4 with
monosolvate. FAB-MS (3-nitrobenzyl alcohol): m/z 562 (M + H+
-
EtOH). 1H NMR (C6D6): δ 2.25-2.28 (m, 4), 2.34 (t, 4), 2.44 (t, 4),
2.52-2.55 (m, 4), 5.02 (s, 1), 7.00-7.05 (m, 12), 7.34-7.38 (m, 8).
Anal. Calcd for C34H43ONP2S2: C, 67.19; H, 7.13; N, 2.30. Found:
C, 67.30; H, 6.85; N, 2.34.
1
S ) /2. A number of related reaction cycles have been proposed.1
nase potentials or the H+/H2 potential at pH 7 (-655 mV vs
SCE), and dihydrogen was formed as a byproduct. These
reductive conditions may subsume approaches i and ii, but in
no case was the reactive nickel species identified.11,12 With
several recent exceptions,10,12h approach iii was not pursued in
relation to hydrogenase.
[Bis(5-(diphenylphosphino)-3-dithiapentanyl)amine]nickel(II) Tet-
rafluoroborate ([Ni(psnet)](BF4)2). A solution of 3.33 g (9.80 mmol)
of [Ni(OH2)6](BF4)2 in 100 mL of ethanol was added dropwise to a
solution of 5.50 g (9.80 mmol) of psnet in 100 mL of ethanol. A deep
purple precipitate formed immediately. The reaction mixture was stirred
for 2 h, and the solid was collected by filtration. This material was
washed thoroughly with ether, toluene, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and again
with ether; it was recrystallized from methanol/ether. The product was
obtained as 4.7 g (61%) of a purple microcrystalline solid. FAB-MS
(3-nitrobenzyl alcohol): m/z 706 (M - BF4-). Visible spectrum
(propylene carbonate): λmax (ꢀM, M-1 cm-1) 526 (1490), 607 (sh, 1160)
nm. 1H NMR (acetone): δ 1.45 (t, 4), 3.05 (t, 4), 3.31 (br, 4), 3.44 (t,
4), 7.46 (m, 8), 7.66 (m, 12). Anal. Calcd for C32H37B2F8NNiP2S2:
C, 48.40; H, 4.70; N, 1.76; Ni, 7.39. Found: C, 48.58; H, 5.06; N,
1.64; Ni, 7.28. The compound was additionally identified by an X-ray
structure determination.
[Bis(5-(diphenylphosphino)-3-thiapentanyl)amine]nickel(I) Tet-
rafluoroborate ([Ni(psnet)](BF4)). To a solid mixture of 1.72 g (2.20
mmol) of [Ni(psnet)](BF4)2 and 0.099 g (2.60 mmol) of NaBH4 was
added 100 mL of THF with rapid stirring. A purple slurry formed
initially; over 1 h the reaction mixture became a deep brown-green
solution, from which a light green powder precipitated over the next 5
h. The precipitate was allowed to settle overnight and was collected
by filtration. To remove excess NaBF4, the green solid was dissolved
in acetonitrile, the mixture was filtered, and the solvent was removed
in vacuo. The crude product was washed extensively with ether and
recrystallized from THF/ether to afford the pure product as 0.92 g (60%)
of a green microcrystalline solid. Absorption spectrum (DMF): λmax
(ꢀM, M-1 cm-1) 259 (13 200), 357 (5500), 949 (107) nm. Anal. Calcd.
for C32H37BF4NNiP2S2: C, 54.35; H, 5.27; N, 1.98; Ni, 8.30. Found:
C, 54.20; H, 5.15; N, 1.88; Ni, 8.19. The compound was additionally
identified by an X-ray structure determination.
Chloro[bis(5-(diphenylphosphino)-3-thiapentanyl)amine]nickel-
(II) Chloride ([Ni(psnet)Cl]Cl). A solution of 0.86 g (2.6 mmol) of
[Ni(OH2)6]Cl2 in 100 mL of ethanol was added dropwise to a solution
of 2.0 g (3.6 mmol) of psnet in 100 mL of ethanol. The resultant deep
purple solution was stirred for 2 h; the solvent was removed in vacuo,
yielding a purple glass which was washed thoroughly with ether. The
solid was dissolved in ca. 75 mL of dimethylformamide (DMF),
forming a pastel green solution. Slow addition of ether followed by
filtration afforded the product as 1.85 g (75%) of light green powder.
FAB-MS (DMF): m/z (M - Cl) 654. Absorption spectrum (DMF):
λmax (ꢀM, M-1 cm-1) 259 (14 600), 630 (21), 968 (sh, 24), 1050 (27)
nm. Anal. Calcd for C32H37Cl2NNiP2S2: C, 55.60; H, 5.39; N, 2.03.
Found: C, 55.50; H, 5.29; N, 2.00.
Our present investigation centers on nickel-mediated dihy-
drogen evolution, for which a working hypothesis is represented
by the scheme in Figure 1. The catalytic cycle contains reaction
2a and thus approach ii-a to dihydrogen evolution. There has
been considerable recent progress in the generation, EPR
properties, and redox chemistry of various Ni(I) com-
plexes;3-5,14-16 however, very few of these complexes have been
isolated in substance16 nor has their reactivity toward protic acids
been tested. Initial complexes in reactions 2 were generated in
situ; in addition, assertions about dihydrogen formation in
reactions 2 are still speculative. We have sought routes to
Ni(I) species reactive toward Bro¨nsted acids but sufficiently
stable to be isolated. The approach taken in this work exploits
the redox versatility of nickel complexes formed with confor-
mationally flexible ligands containing mixed hard-soft donor
sets.6 Here we have utilized fully characterized Ni(II,I)
complexes of the pentadentate ligand bis(5-diphenylphosphino)-
3-thiapentanyl)amine and show that the Ni(I) species is capable
of stoichiometric dihydrogen evolution. Inasmuch as the H2-
evolving system developed here includes neither a Ni-Fe
complex nor thiolate ligation at the nickel site, properties of
the active site of DesulfoVibrio gigas (D. gigas) hydrogenase
established by crystallography,17 it cannot be construed, and is
not intended, as a close functional analogue of hydrogenase. It
is, instead, a first-generation experimental representation of
nickel-mediated dihydrogen evolution whose reactivity and
mechanism indicate certain features obligatory to a functional
analogue.
Experimental Section
Preparation of Compounds. Unless otherwise noted, all operations
were carried out under a pure dinitrogen atmosphere. Reagents were
(14) (a) Baidya, N.; Olmstead, M.; Mascharak, P. K. Inorg. Chem. 1991,
30, 929. (b) Baidya, N.; Olmstead, M.; Mascharak, P. K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 9666. (c) Baidya, N.; Noll, B. C.; Olmstead, M. M.;
Mascharak, P. K. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 2999. (d) Baidya, N.;
Olmstead, M. M.; Whitehead, J. P.; Bagyinka, C.; Maroney, M. J.;
Mascharak, P. K. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 3612.
(15) Farmer, P. J.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Lindahl, P. A.; Darensbourg, M. Y.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4665.
(16) Suh, M. P.; Kim, H. K.; Kim, M. J.; Oh, K. Y. Inorg. Chem. 1992,
31, 3620.
(17) Volbeda, A.; Charon, M.-H.; Piras, C.; Hatchikian, E. C.; Frey, M.;
Fontecilla-Camps, J. C. Nature 1995, 373, 580.
(18) Chatt, J.; Dilworth, J. R.; Schmutz, J. A.; Zubieta, J. A. J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. 1979, 1595.
(19) Stavropoulos, P.; Muetterties, M. C.; Carrie´, M.; Holm, R. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8485.