alkaloids 1-3 from N-Boc-3-methoxy piperidine and N-Boc-
δ-valerolactam via (S)-N-Boc-pipecolic acid.
tetrahydropyridine with (R)-BINAP-RuCl2, as reported by
Foti and Commins, gives an (S)-configured product in 52%
yield with an er of 90:10.7 It is interesting that their ester,
which differs from the methyl ester of 4 only by a tert-butyl
group vs a phenyl group on the N-carboxy function, gives a
product that has the same configuration as we observe,
although they use the catalyst of the opposite configuration.7,8
Changes in the facial selectivity in reductions with chiral
Ru(II) complexes at different pressures are known, although
changes to this degree are unusual.5b
Asymmetry is introduced into the piperidine ring by the
enantioselective hydrogenation of 2-carboxy-N-Boc-1,4,5,6-
tetrahydropyridine (4) with the Noyori catalyst5 (S)-BINAP-
RuCl2 to yield (S)-N-Boc-pipecolic acid (5) in high enan-
tioenrichment after one recrystallization as shown in Scheme
1. Prior to recrystallization, 5 is obtained in 95% yield with
The precursor to (S)-N-Boc-pipecolic acid (5), 2-carboxy-
N-Boc-1,4,5,6- tetrahydropyridine (4), was prepared by either
of two methods as shown in Scheme 2. Following our
Scheme 2
Scheme 1
an er of 98:2 as shown in Table 1. The table also shows that
reductions of the N-tert-butyl amide, the N-(3,5-dimethyl)
phenyl amide, the N, N-diethyl amide, and the methyl ester
corresponding to 4 with (S)-BINAP-RuCl2 provided the
Table 1. Reduction of 4 and Derivatives with
(S)-BINAP-RuCl2
previous report, 3-hydroxypiperidine hydrochloride (6) was
reacted with (Boc)2O to afford 7 in 83% yield.9 Treatment
of 7 with sodium hydride and iodomethane gave 8 in 89%
yield. The reaction of 8 with 2 equiv of s-BuLi/TMEDA
(-78 °C, 5 h), followed by the addition of carbon dioxide,
afforded 4 in 80% yield.9 In an alternative sequence,
δ-valerolactam (9) was reacted with (Boc)2O and DMAP in
acetonitrile to afford 10 in 79% yield. Reduction with
DIBALH gave lactamol 11, which was dehydrated without
purification with p-TsOH in toluene to provide the enecar-
bamate 12 in 86% yield from 10 following the procedure of
Dieter.10 When 12 was reacted with s-BuLi/TMEDA, under
conditions similar to those used for the conversion of 8 to
4, low yields of 4 were obtained. A yield of 52% of 4 was
Y
yield (%)
er
OH
95
99
78
83
66
98:2
98:2
96:4
87:13
73:27
NH-t-Bu
NH-3,5-Me2C6H3
N(C2H5)2
OCH3
expected enantioenriched reduction products in 99%, 78%,
83%, and 66% yields with ers of 98:2, 96:4, 87:13, and 73:
27, respectively. Reductions of 4 with (S)-BINAP-Rh(I),
(R, R)-DIPAMP-Rh(I) gave the racemic acid, while (R, R)-
Me-DuPhos-Rh(I) afforded the product with an er of 71:
29.6 Reduction of 2-carboxymethyl-N-phenoxycarbonyl 1,4,5,6-
(5) (a) Noyori, R.; Ohkuma, T.; Kitamura, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987,
109, 5856. See also (b) Noyori, R. Asymmertic Catalysis In Organic
Synthesis; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1994; Chapter 2. (c) Saburi, M.;
Shao, L.; Sakaurai, T.; Uchida, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 7877.
(6) (a) Miyashita, A.; Yasuda, A.; Takaya, H.; Toriumi, K.; Ito, T.;
Souichi, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7932. (b) Miyahsita,
A.; Takaya, H.; Souichi, T.; Noyori, R. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 1245. (c)
Ohta, T.; Takaya, H.; Kitamura, M.; Nagai, K.; Noyori, R. J. Org. Chem.
1987, 52, 3174. (d) Mashima, K.; Kusano, K.; Ohta, T.; Noyori, R.; Takay,
H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 1209. (e) Kawano, H.; Ikariya,
T.; Ishii, X.; Saburi, M.; Uchida, Y.; Kumobayashi, H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans 1 1989, 1571. (f) Saburi, M.; Shao, L.; Sakurai, T.; Uchida, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 7877. (g) Vineyard, B. D.; Knowles, W. J.;
Sabacky, M. J.; Bachman, G. L.; Weinkauff, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977,
99, 5946-5952. (h) Knowles, W. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1983, 16, 106. (i)
Burk, M. J.; Feaster, J. E.; Nugent, W. A.; Harlow, R. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 10125-10138. (j) Burk, M. J.; Wang, X. M.; Lee, J. R. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5142-5143. (k) Ojima, I.; Kogure, T.; Yoda,
N. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 4728-4739.
(7) Foti, C. J.; Comins, D. L. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2656-2657.
(8) For mechanistic analysis of related reactions, see (a) Chan, A. S. C.;
Pluth, J. J.; Halpern, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5952. (b) Chua, P. S.;
Roberts, N. K.; Bosnich, B.; Okrasinski, S. J.; Halpern, J. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1981, 1278. (c) Landis, C. L.; Halpern, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1987, 109, 1746-1754. (d) Ashby, M. T.; Halpern, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 589-594.
(9) Beak, P.; Lee, W. K. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1109.
(10) Dieter, R. K.; Sharma, R. R. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4180.
156
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 2, 2000