3
Based on the results obtained in Table 1, a procedure for the
synthesis of esters 3a-f was developed. The required changes
include altering the sequence for the addition of reagents to the
CAN/LiBr mixture: firstly, methanol was added, followed by the
aldehyde (Table 3).
acid bromides at the α-СН2 group with formation of 2-
bromoalkanoyl bromides (mechanism А). It should be noted that
esters 3a-f cannot be transformed to esters 2a-f under the
experimental conditions given in Table 1. This was exemplified
using methyl heptanoate 3c as starting reagent, which was not
converted into 2-bromocarboxylate 2c (see ESI).
Table 3. Synthesis of methyl esters 3a-f
a
Yield 3a-f (%)b
3. Conclusion
Entry
1a-f
1
2
3
4
5
6
1-pentanal, 1a
1-hexanal, 1b
1-heptanal, 1c
1-octanal, 1d
1-nonanal, 1e
1-decanal, 1f
3a, 78 (70)
3b, 80 (73)
3c, 81 (73)
3d, 81 (70)
3e, 80 (76)
3f, 82 (74)
In summary, a new method was developed for the synthesis
of methyl 2-bromocarboxylates, based on the oxidative
bromination-esterification of aliphatic aldehydes using the
CAN/LiBr system. The reaction proceeds under mild conditions
in the absence of solvent through successive steps: bromination
of the aldehyde to form the carboxylic acid bromide and then to
2-bromocarboxylic acid bromide followed by alcoholysis of the
latter with methanol. Methyl 2-bromoesters were produced in up
to 87% yield. Additionally, a novel procedure was developed for
the synthesis of methyl esters from aldehydes by the oxidation of
the latter together with methanol using the same oxidation
system.
aGeneral reaction conditions: molar ratio 1a-f:CAN:LiBr:MeOH = 1:2:0.3: 2,
1a-f (1 mmol), 35-40 °C, 3.5-4 h. bYield with respect to the starting aldehyde
1a-f was determined by GC using methyl pentanoate and methyl decanoate as
internal standards. Isolated yield in parenthesis.
Under the optimal reaction conditions using the reagents
1:CAN:LiBr:MeOH in a molar ratio of 1:2.1:0.3:2 at 35-40 °C
for 3.5 h, esters 3a-f were obtained in 78-82% yield (Entries 1-6).
The oxidation proceeds without additional solvent, which makes
it convenient for the synthesis of methyl esters.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic
Research (Grant no 16-03-00213 a).
Supplementary Material
Supplementary data (experimental procedures, spectroscopic
data for all of the synthesized compounds) associated with this
article can be found, in the online version, at http://........
References and notes
1. Sundararaman, P.; Walker, Erik C.; Djerassi, C. Tetrahedron Lett.
1978, 19, 1627-1628.
2. Stevens, R. V.; Chapman, K. T.; Stubbs, C. A.; Tam, W. W.; Albizati,
K. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 4647-4650.
3. Corey, E. J.; Samuelsson, B. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 4735-4735.
4. O’Connor, B.; Just, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 3235-3236.
5. McDonald, C.; Holcomb, H.; Kennedy, K.; Kirkpatrick, E.; Leathers,
T.; Vanemon, P. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 1213-1215.
6. Travis, B.R.; Sivakumar, M.; Hollist, G.O.; Borhan, B. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 1031-1034.
Scheme 2. Proposed reaction mechanism
Taking into account published data on the oxidative
esterification of aldehydes and the oxidative bromination of
ketones, two alternative mechanisms for the transformation of
aldehydes 1a-f to esters 2a-f can be a priori envisaged (Scheme
2).
7. Qian, G.; Zhao, R.; Ji, D.; Lu, G.; Qi, Y.; Suo, J. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33,
834-835.
Mechanism А involves two key steps: successive bromination
of the aldehyde group and the α-СН2 group followed by
esterification of the resulting 2-bromoalkanoyl bromides with
methanol. This interpretation is consistent with the results of
Minisci and co-wokers.20 It was proposed that the oxidation of
aldehydes to esters in the presence of the H2O2/HBr system
proceeds via bromination of the aldehyde group and alcoholysis
of the resulting acid bromides.
8. Sayama, S.; Onami, T. Synlett 2004, 2739-2745.
9. (a) Yoo, W. -J.; Li, C. -J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6266-6268; (b) Yoo,
W. -J.; Li, C. -J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1033-1035.
10. Wang, N.; Liu, R.; Xu, Q.; Liang, X. Chem. Lett. 2006, 35, 5665-5667.
11. Wu, X. -F.; Darcel, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 1144-1147.
12. Chavan, S. P.; Dantale, S. W.; Govande, C. A.; Venkatraman, M. S.;
Praveen, C. Synlett 2002, 267-268.
13. Gopinath, R.; Barkakaty, B.; Talukdar, B.; Patel B. K. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 2944-2947.
14. Rajbongshi, K. K.; Sarma, M. J.; Phukan, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014,
55, 5358-5360.
15. Feng, J. -B.; Gong, J. -L.; Li, Q.; Wu, X.-F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014,
55, 1657-1659.
16. Guggilapu, S. D.; Prajapti, S. K.; Babu, B. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015,
56, 889-892.
17. Shaikh, T. M. A.; Emmanuvel, L.; Sudala, A. Synth. Commun. 2007,
2641-2646.
18. Tohma, H.; Maegawa, T.; Kita, Y. Synlett 2003, 723-725.
19. Kajigaeshi, S.; Nakagawa, T.; Nagasaki, N.; Yamasaki, H.; S. Fujisaki,
S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1986, 59, 747-750.
Mechanism B differs only in the sequence of steps. Thus, the
α-СН2 group is brominated first and is followed by bromination
at the aldehyde group. This could be evidenced by the results for
selective bromination of the α-СН2 group in aliphatic ketones
using the CAN/LiBr system where 2-bromoketones were
produced with high selectivity and high yield.27
That the reaction follows mechanism А is supported by the
results presented in Table 1 (in particular, entries 1 and 2).
According to these results, a decrease in the amount of oxidant
(CAN) from 4 to 1-2 equiv. with respect to heptanal 1c, results in
bromination predominantly occurring at the aldehyde group,
while the α-СН2 group remains virtually intact. Consequently, the
transformation of alkanals to esters 2a-f starts with bromination
of the aldehyde group followed by bromination of the resulting
20. Amati, A.; Dosualdo, G.; Zhao, L.; Bravo, A.; Fontana, F.; Minisci, F.;
Bjørsvik, H.-R. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 1998, 2, 261-269.
21. Koo, B. -S.; Lee, C. K.; Lee, K. -J. Synth. Commun. 2002, 32, 2115-
2123.