2362 Jasim et al.
Asian J. Chem.
Synthesis of thiadiazole 1 (1-phenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-
compounds inhibitor after different time (1-5 h), the strips were
taken out washed, dried and weighed accurately. Duplicate
experiments were performed in each and the mean value of
the weight loss was reported. Inhibition efficiency E %, surface
coverage (θ) and corrosion rate were determined.
Tafel extrapolation method: Polarization studies were
carried out using Bank Eleiktronkik Intellgent Controls Model
MLab 200, Chemistry Department, Education College of pure
Science, Basrah University, Iraq. Tafel polarization obtained
by changing the electrode potential automatically from (+250
mV to -250 mV) at open circuit potential with a scan rate 0.5
mV S-1 to study the effect of inhibitor on mild steel corrosion
[17]. The linear Tafel segment of cathodic and anodic curves
were extrapolated to corrosion potential to obtain the corrosion
current densities (Icorr).
5-thiol) [14]: To a solution containing 95 % ethanol and 0.1
mol of sodium hydroxide (dissolved in the least amount of
water), 0.1 mol of thiobenzoic hydrazide was added, followed
by 0.15 mol of carbon disulfide. The reaction mixture was
heated under reflux for 3 h till all the evolution of hydrogen
sulfide ceased. The resulting mixture was diluted with water
and acidified with diluted hydrochloric acid containing ice.
The reaction mixture was allowed to stand at the ice bath for
60 min, filtered, washed with water and recrystallized from
methanol (Scheme-I). The characterizations of the synthesized
compounds are listed in Table-1.
N
N
S
KOH + CS2
EtOH
SH
NHNH
2
S
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Scheme-I: Synthesis of thiadiazole
FT-IR spectra: FT-IR spectra of the synthesized compounds
were carried out using KBr disc method. The IR data of the
parent thiadiazole compound showed a band at 2766 cm-1
which is characteristic of the S-H stretching [18,19] (Fig. 1).
This band was lacked in the S-substituted derivatives S-R
(Table-2).
Preparation of thiadiazoles derivatives:The compounds,
5-ethylthio-1-phenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole (2a), 5-butylthio-1-
phenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole (2b), 5-pentylthio-1-phenyl-1,3,4-
thiadiazole (2c) and 5-benzylthio-1-phenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole
(2d), were prepared by the same method [15].
All IR spectra of thiadiazole compounds showed strong-
weak bands at 1623-1590 and 1551-1487 cm-1, which are
characteristic of the C=N and C=C ring stretching, respectively.
Strong-medium bands at 1271-1245 and 1126-1032 cm-1
which are characteristic for C-N stretching of thiadiazole ring
[20]. Strong-weak absorption band at 3048-3024 and 784-746
cm-1, which are characteristic of aromatic C-H stretching and
bending, respectively.
A mixture of 0.015 mol (2.67 g) of compound 1, 0.018
mol of alkyl bromides or benzyl chloride and 0.02 mol (1.64g)
of sodium acetate in 50 mL of ethanol was heated under reflux
for 4 h and allowed to cool and poured into 100 mL of cold
water containing ice. The solid product was collected and
recrystallized from ethanol (Scheme-II). The characterizations
of the products are summarized in Table-1.
N
N
1
1H NMR: H NMR spectra of the prepared thiadiazole
N
N
R-X
+ CH COONa
3
R
compounds were performed in deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide
solutions with tetramethylsaline as an internal standard. All
these spectra showed signals at 2.5 ppm, which was due to
DMSO solvent.
Ethanol, Ref. 4 hrs
SH
S
S
S
R = CH3CH2- = 2a; CH3CH2CH2CH2- = 2b;
CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2- = 2c; Ph-CH2- = 2d
The parent thiadiazole (1) has a characteristic singlet
signal at 2.821 ppm due to proton of thiol group [19] and this
signal is not appeared in the thiadiazole derivative compounds.
The compounds 2a-d exhibited a characteristic aliphatic
system which gave signals in the high field range between
0.912-4.528 ppm.All thiadiazole compounds exhibited multi-
plet signals in the downfield range between 7.272-8.168 ppm
due to the protons of the aromatic systems (Table-3).
Scheme-II: Synthesis of thiadiazole derivatives
Weight loss measurements [16]: The mild steel sheets
used in this present work have the composition presented in
Table-1 and strip of 3.5 cm × 2.5 cm × 0.4 cm size. Before
measurements, the mild steel coupons were mechanically
polished with series of emery paper of variable grades starting
with the coarsest and proceeding in steps to the finest (600)
grade, degreased with absolute ethanol, dipped into acetone
and washed with deionized water. The coupons were dried
and kept in desiccators. After weighing accurately, the speci-
mens were immersed in 50 mL of cooling water and without
and with addition of different concentrations of thiadiazole
Gravimetric measurements
Inhibition efficiency at different times: Inhibition effi-
ciency (E %), surface coverage (θ) and corrosion rate was deter-
mined by using following equations [21]:
TABLE-1
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SYNTHESIZED THIADIAZOLE COMPOUNDS
Elemental analysis (%): Found (calcd.)
Compd.
No.
m.w.
(g/mol)
m.p.
(°C)
Yield
(%)
m.f.
Colour
C
H
N
S
C8H6N2S2
194.28 White needle crystal
222.33 White needle crystal
250.38 White crystal
209-211
156-158
147-149
140-142
122-124
88
74
83
84
80
48.76 (49.46)
54.42 (54.02)
56.13 (57.56)
59.11 (59.05)
63.10 (63.35)
3.33 (3.11)
4.69 (4.53)
5.55 (5.64)
6.22 (6.10)
4.34 (4.25)
13.87 (14.42) 33.87 (33.01)
13.02 (12.60) 28.26 (28.84)
11.47 (11.19) 26.02 (25.61)
1
C10H10N2S2
C12H14N2S2
C13H16N2S2
C15H12N2S2
2a
2b
2c
2d
264.40 White crystal
10.24(10.59)
10.02 (9.85)
24.65(24.25)
22.19(22.55)
284.39 White needle crystal