1794 Organometallics, Vol. 19, No. 9, 2000
Arterburn et al.
0.1% v/v aqueous acetone (20 mL) was added sodium carbonate
(400 mg), and the mixture was heated at reflux for 2 h. The
reaction mixture was filtered and concentrated in vacuo, and
the crude product was isolated by addition of hexanes to a
dichloromethane solution and purified by recrystallization
from hexanes/CH2Cl2 to give the product 4 (70 mg, 73%
yield): UV-vis (CH2Cl2) λ ) 244, 268, 348, 444 nm; FT-IR
These results demonstrate the stability of the orga-
noimido linkage against competing hydrolysis to the oxo
and in the presence of more basic alkylamines. When
CH2Cl2 solvent was used, the amide formation was
slower, and oxidation of the PPh3 ligands by the released
N-hydroxysuccinimide caused decompostion of the or-
ganoimido complexes. The dithiocarbamate complexes
3 and 4 were unaffected by N-hydroxysuccinimide, but
the organoimido groups were not stable under the
reaction conditions with alkylamines and hydrolysis to
the oxo complexes was observed. The problem of PPh3
oxidation of 2 could potentially be avoided by preparing
other activated carboxylic acid derivatives such as the
pentachlorophenol or nitrophenol esters. The stability
of the organoimido bond is dramatically affected by the
nature of the ancillary ligands, and further efforts will
attempt to develop systems with enhanced stability and
water solubility.
1
1780, 1744, 1500, 1072, 684 cm-1; H NMR δ 7.88 (d, J ) 8.7
Hz, 4H), 7.28 (d, J ) 8.2 Hz, 4H), 3.95-3.55 (m, 16H), 2.87 (s,
8H), 1.37 (t, J ) 7.0 Hz, 24H); 13C NMR δ 239.47, 169.27,
164.24, 130.99, 124.55, 118.70, 43.70, 25.53, 12.63.
Syn th esis of Cl3(P h 3P )2RedN-C6H4CONHCH(CH3)2 (5a).
Isopropylamine (50 µL, 1 mmol) was added to a solution of 2
(105 mg, 0.1 mmol) in DMF (4 mL) and stirred at 25 °C for 10
min. Water (36 mL) was added while stirring vigorously to
precipitate the complex. The product was filtered, washed with
water and hexanes, and then recrystallized from dichlo-
romethane by adding hexanes to give the green solid 5a (70
mg, 70% yield): UV-vis (CH2Cl2) λ ) 234, 264, 346 nm (ꢀ )
13000); FT-IR 1639, 1525, 1435, 1093, 745, 694, 521 cm-1; 1H
NMR δ 7.85-7.70 (m, 12H), 7.38-7.15 (m, 20H), 6.88 (d, J )
8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.76 (m, 1H), 4.23 (m, 1H), 1.26 (d, J ) 6.4 Hz,
6H); 13C NMR δ 163.62, 158.19, 135.33, 133.29, 132.17, 131.67,
130.70, 128.22, 121.76, 42.81, 23.13; 31P{1H} NMR δ -21.05
(s). Anal. Calcd for C46H42Cl3N2OP2Re‚0.5CH2Cl2: C, 53.86; H,
4.15; N, 2.70. Found: C, 53.89; H, 4.09; N, 2.77.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l P r oced u r es. Reagents were purchased from
Aldrich or Acros and used as received. Trichlorooxobis(tri-
phenylphosphine)rhenium(V) was prepared according to the
literature procedure.19 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were
recorded at 200 and 50 MHz, respectively, using CDCl3 as
solvent and internally referenced to TMS. 31P{1H} NMR
spectra were obtained at 161.9 MHz, referenced to an internal
capillary containing 85% H3PO4(aq) (δ ) 0). IR spectra were
recorded as KBr pellets using a Perkin-Elmer 1720 X FT-IR
spectrometer. UV-vis spectra were recorded using a Hewlett-
Packard 8452A diode array spectrophotometer. Elemental
analyses were performed by Desert Analytics, Tucson, AZ.
Syn th esis of Cl3(P P h 3)2RedN-C6H4CO2N(COCH2)2 (2).
Triphenylphosphine (1.57 g, 6 mmol) was added to a solution
of N3C6H4CO2N(COCH2)2 (780 mg, 3.0 mmol) in benzene (200
mL) and stirred for 20 min at 25 °C, and trichlorooxobis-
(triphenylphosphine)rhenium(V) (2.50 g, 3.0 mmol) was then
added and the mixture heated to reflux for 1 h. The volatiles
were removed in vacuo, and the product was recrystallized
from dichloromethane by the addition of hexanes, filtered, and
washed with Et2O and hexanes to give a green solid, 2 (2.865
g, 91% yield): UV-vis (CH2Cl2) λ ) 234, 266, 298 (ꢀ ) 16 400),
336 nm (ꢀ ) 14 030); FT-IR 1770, 1743, 1197, 745, 694, 521
cm-1; 1H NMR δ 7.88-7.72 (m, 12H), 7.52 (d, J ) 8.6 Hz, 2H),
Syn th esis of Cl3(P h 3P )2RedN-C6H4CONHCH(CH3)CH-
(CH3)2 (5b). The procedure described for the synthesis of 5a
was repeated using 2 (105 mg, 0.10 mmol) and 2-amino-3-
methylbutane (87 mg, 1.00 mmol) to give the green solid 5b
(70 mg, 69% yield): UV-vis (CH2Cl2) λ ) 234, 264, 346 nm (ꢀ
) 11 437); FT-IR 1655, 1536, 1435, 1093, 745, 694, 521 cm-1
;
1H NMR δ 7.88-7.68 (m, 12H), 7.40-7.10 (m, 20H), 6.88 (d, J
) 7.4 Hz, 2H), 5.75 (m, 1H), 4.02 (m, 1H), 1.80 (m, 1H), 1.17
(d, J ) 6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.95 (d, J ) 6.0 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR δ 165.22,
157.61, 134.73, 131.51, 131.09, 130.09, 127.59, 127.11, 121.20,
50.71, 32.86, 18.51, 17.36; 31P{1H} NMR δ -19.46.
Syn th esis of Cl3(P h 3P )2RedN-C6H4CONH(CH2)2P h (5c).
The procedure described for the synthesis of 5a was repeated
using 2 (50 mg, 0.05 mmol) and phenethylamine (50 µL, 0.50
mmol) to give the green complex 5c (35 mg, 67%): UV-vis
(CH2Cl2) λ ) 232, 264, 344 nm (ꢀ ) 10 598); FT-IR 1665, 1541,
1093, 747, 694, 521 cm-1; 1H NMR δ 7.90-7.70 (m, 12H), 7.45-
7.15 (m, 23H), 7.08 (d, J ) 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J ) 8.4 Hz,
2H), 5.96 (m, 1H), 3.67 (q, J ) 6.7 Hz, 2H), 2.92 (t, J ) 6.7
Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 166.48, 158.10, 139.12, 135.30, 132.08,
131.69, 131.15, 130.65, 129.23, 128.21, 127.87, 127.19, 121.77,
41.75, 35.87; 31P{1H} NMR δ -19.83 (s).
7.35-7.20 (m, 18H), 6.88 (d, J ) 8.6 Hz, 2H), 2.91 (s, 4H); 13
C
NMR δ 169.36, 160.49, 135.21, 132.22, 131.73, 131.17, 130.78,
128.22, 123.20, 121.31, 26.07; 31P{1H} NMR δ -23.66 (s). Anal.
Calcd for C47H38Cl3N2O4P2Re: C, 53.80; H, 3.65; N, 2.67.
Found: C, 53.73; H, 3.65 N, 2.66.
Syn th esis of Cl3(P h 3P )2RedN-C6H4CONHCH2P h (5d ).
The procedure described for the synthesis of 5a was repeated
using 2 (105 mg, 0.1 mmol) and benzylamine (110 µL, 1 mmol),
and the crude product was recrystallized by slow diffusion of
ethanol into a dichloromethane solution to give the green
complex 5d (75 mg, 72% yield): UV-vis (CH2Cl2) λ ) 234, 264,
Syn th esis of Cl[(Et)2NCS2]2RedN-C6H4CO2N(COCH2)2
(3). A mixture of 2 (300 mg, 0.28 mmol) and tetraethylthi-
uramdisulfide (170 mg, 0.57 mmol) was heated at reflux in
dry acetone (20 mL) under argon for 1 h, during which time
the solution became dark green. The volume was reduced to 5
mL, and the flask was cooled in an ice bath to crystallize the
complex. The complex was filtered and washed with cold
acetone and Et2O to give 3 (150 mg, 84% yield): UV-vis (CH2-
Cl2): λ ) 234, 272, 296 (ꢀ ) 24 045), 418 nm (ꢀ ) 4710); FT-IR
344 nm (ꢀ ) 13 398); FT-IR 1656, 1093, 745, 694, 521 cm-1
;
1H NMR δ 7.82-7.73 (m, 12H), 7.40-7.30 (m, 5H), 7.26-7.17
(m, 20H), 6.86 (d, J ) 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.35 (t, J ) 5.2 Hz, 1H),
4.58 (d, J ) 5.2 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR δ 166.30, 158.27, 138.19,
135.20, 133.97, 132.66, 132.06, 131.64, 130.63, 129.31, 128.56,
120.17, 121.75, 44.71; 31P{1H} NMR δ -21.29 (s). Anal. Calcd
for C50H42Cl3N2O2P2Re-0.25CH2Cl2: C, 56.74; H, 3.98. Found:
C, 56.92; H, 3.60.
1
1769, 1741, 1531, 1073, 997 cm-1; H NMR δ 7.99 (d, J ) 8.6
Hz, 2H), 7.54 (d, J ) 8.6 Hz, 2H) 3.95-3.65 (m, 8H), 2.89 (s,
4H), 1.38 (t, J ) 7.1 Hz, 12H); 13C NMR δ 239.88, 168.95,
161.12, 131.51, 123.81, 122.79, 45.16, 25.50, 12.42. Anal. Calcd
for C21H28ClN4O4S4Re: C, 33.61; H, 3.76; N, 7.47. Found: C,
33.37; H, 3.74; N, 7.41.
Syn th esis of Cl3(P h 3P )2RedN-C6H4CON(CH2)4 (5e). The
procedure described for the synthesis of 5a was repeated using
2 (50 mg, 0.05 mmol) and pyrrolidine (50 µL, 0.50 mmol), and
the crude product was recrystallized by slow diffusion of
ethanol into a dichloromethane solution to give the green
complex 5e (35 mg, 70% yield) and recrystallized from dichlo-
romethane and ethanol: UV-vis (CH2Cl2) λ ) 232, 264, 344
Syn th esis of O[((Et)2NCS2-)2RedN-C6H4CO2N(CO-
CH2)2]2 (4). To a solution of complex 3 (100 mg, 0.13 mmol) in
nm (ꢀ ) 10 486); FT-IR 1628, 1092, 745, 694, 521 cm-1
;
1H
(19) J ohnson, N. P.; Lock, C. J . L.; Wilkinson, G. Inorg. Synth. 1967,
9, 145-148.
NMR δ 7.85-7.65 (m, 12H), 7.30-7.15 (m, 18H), 6.93 (d, J )