Y. Deng, Y. Ding, Z. Huang et al.
Journal of Molecular Liquids 329 (2021) 115549
identified by FT-IR, 1H and 13C NMR (see Supplementary Information,
Figs. S1, S2 and S5). FT-IR (cm−1): 2956–2869 (CH in CH2), 1638 (CO
in COOH), 1379 (C−N in N+444Bn). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ/ppm):
0.85–0.88 (CH3, t, 3H), 0.97–1.01 (3CH3, t, 9H), 1.21–1.23 (8CH2, m,
16H), 1.36–1.45 (4CH2, m, 8H), 1.51–1.55 (1CH2, t, 2H), 1.73–1.81
(4CH2, m, 8H), 2.07–2.11 (1CH2, t, 2H), 3.20–3.24, (3CH2, t, 6H), 4.79
(1CH2, s, 2H), 7.42–7.49 (5Ar−H, m, 5H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3, δ
ppm): 13.50 (3CH3), 18.26 (1CH3), 19.50 (3CH2), 20.60 (1CH2), 24.01
(3CH2), 26.72 (1CH2), 29.53 (4CH2), 29.81 (4CH2), 34.18 (1CH2), 38.39
(1CH2), 57.02 (1CH2), 5 s8.08 (4CH2), 62.45 (1CH2), 65.84 (1CH2),
127.36 (1Ar-CH), 127.90 (1Ar-CH), 128.37 (1Ar-CH), 129.22 (1Ar-CH),
130.58 (1Ar-CH), 132.26 (1Ar-CH), 179.34 (C).
1 and 2 ions, [M]aq is the equilibrium concentration of REEs ions in strip-
ping acid, and [M]ILs is the initial concentration of loaded REEs ions in
the extracting phase, respectively.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. The effect of extraction time and aqueous pH
In solvent extraction investigations, accelerating kinetics is impor-
tant for improving extraction performance [28,29]. To study the extrac-
tion kinetics, a feed solution of 0.007 M YCl3 with pH value of 4 was
contacted with 0.018 M organic phase at an organic/aqueous phase vol-
ume ratio (O/A) of 1. As shown in Fig. 1a, the extraction efficiencies
reached 45.15% and 87.18% after shaking for 2 min for [N444Bn][MA]
and [N444Bn]2[DDA], respectively. Then, the extraction efficiencies
slightly increased within 10 min and were maintained at 89.01% and
47.45% after 20 min, indicating that 20 min was enough to achieve ex-
traction equilibrium between the two phases. Notably, to ensure that
the extraction equilibrium is reached and keep the experimental condi-
tions consistent, the shaking time is prolonged. Therefore, all further ex-
traction experiments were performed within 30 min.
To investigate the effect of solution acidity on extraction behavior,
the extraction efficiency of Y(III) was measured at different pH values
using [N444Bn][MA] and [N444Bn]2[DDA]. The initial aqueous phase
contained 0.007 M YCl3 and 0.1 M NaCl. By adding a certain amount of
1 M HCl or 1 M NaOH solution, the pH values of the aqueous phase
were adjusted and varied between 1.5 and 5.0. As presented in Fig. 1b,
all the extraction efficiencies of Y(III) increased with increasing aqueous
pH value. For example, the extraction efficiencies were 1.12% and
1.11% at pH = 1.8 for [N444Bn][MA] and [N444Bn]2[DDA], respectively,
and then increased to 48.27% and 94.14% at pH = 5.0. The negative
effect of high acidity could be attributed to the competitive extrac-
tion between Y(III) and H+ [30]. More specifically, the amount of
ILs combined with protons obviously increased with increasing H+
concentration in the aqueous phase, resulting in a reduced probabil-
ity of coordination between the ILs and Y(III), accordingly leading to
a decay in the extraction efficiency of Y(III) [31]. More importantly,
2.3.2. Preparation of benzyl(tributyl)azanium dodecanedioic acetate
[N444Bn]2[DDA]
A solution of [N444Bn]OH in ethanol was prepared from [N444Bn]Cl
(1.5597 g, 0.005 mol) using amberlite 717-type anion-exchange resin.
Then, 0.5758 g DDA (0.0025 mol) was added to the [N444Bn]OH solution.
The mixture was then stirred at room temperature for 12 h until the so-
lution became neutral. After the ethanol and water were distilled in a
rotary evaporator, the product was dried in a vacuum at 70 °C to yield
a slightly yellowish viscous liquid (90.55% yield). The density and vis-
cosity were 0.967 g·cm−3 and 1445 mPa·s, respectively. The structure
was identified by FT-IR 1H and 13C NMR (see Supplementary Informa-
tion, Figs. S3-S5). FT-IR (cm−1): 2950–2848 (CH in CH2), 1637 (CO in
COOH), 1389 (C−N in N+444Bn). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm):
0.98–1.02 (6CH3, m, 18H), 1.20–1.25 (6CH2, m, 12H), 1.37–1.46(6CH2,
m, 12H), 1.53–1.60 (2CH2, m, 4H), 1.73–1.81 (6CH2, m, 12H),
2.14–2.18 (2CH2, t, 4H), 3.23–3.27 (6CH2, t, 12H), 4.85 (2CH2, s, 4H),
7.33–7.36 (2Ar−H, m, 2H), 7.45–7.49 (8Ar−H, m, 8H). 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3, δ/ppm): 13.44 (6CH3), 19.45 (6CH2), 22.46 (2CH2),
24.00 (4CH2), 26.90 (2CH2), 29.13 (2CH2), 29.53 (2CH2), 29.88 (2CH2),
38.86 (2CH2), 56.91 (2CH2), 58.10 (4CH2), 62.44 (2CH2), 127.37 (4Ar-
CH), 129.15 (2Ar-CH), 130.50 (2Ar-CH), 132.26 (4Ar-CH), 179.34 (2C).
2.4. Extraction experiments
All extraction experiments were performed by mixing equal vol-
umes of organic phase (the as-prepared ILs dissolved in a mixture of
sulfonated kerosene and n-octanol with a volume ratio of 7:3) and
aqueous phase containing REEs ions. The extractions were performed
in vials and shaken at 1700 rpm for 30 min at 303 K in a temperature-
controllable turbo thermoshaker (HUXI, HX-20). Sodium chloride was
used to maintain constant ionic strength during the extraction. After
the extraction, two-phase separation was achieved by a benchtop cen-
trifuge (CENCE, TGL-16 M) operating at 8000 rpm for 5 min. The Y(III)
ions were back-extracted from the loaded organic phase with dilute hy-
drochloric acid. The stripping efficiency was calculated by measuring
the concentration of Y(III) ions in the stripping acid. The extraction effi-
ciency (E), distribution ratio (D), stripping efficiency (S) and separation
factors (β) were obtained using the following equations:
the comparison of the extractability also revealed that [N444Bn
]
2
[DDA] was much better than [N444Bn][MA] at pH values ranging
from 2.5 to 5.0, showing that [DDA]− was dominant in improving
the REEs extraction capacity over [MA]−
.
3.2. The effect of salting-out agent and extractant concentration
The salting-out agent is essential to the extraction process due to the
elimination of emulsification and improved extractability with the addi-
tion of NaCl [32]. Therefore, the effect of the salting-out agent on extrac-
tion behaviors was investigated in 0.007 M YCl3 solution with different
amounts of NaCl (Fig. 2a). As expected, the extraction efficiencies of Y
(III) for both [N444Bn][MA] and [N444Bn]2[DDA] significantly increased
with increasing concentrations of NaCl, which efficiently facilitated the
generation of chloro-complexes containing REEs ions and thereby en-
hanced extractability. The main reason is assumed to be that NaCl
with a high water-binding capacity can reduce the hydration of Y(III)
and cause free water to continue to be lost in aqueous solution [33].
Salt anions also act as bridges to connect with the IL and REEs ions
and undergo strong complexation at the liquid-liquid interface [34].
Furthermore, the effect of the extractant concentration was also studied
in 0.007 M YCl3 aqueous solution associated with the addition of 0.1 M
NaCl. As depicted in Fig. 2b, the extractabilities of Y(III) exhibited an in-
creasing trend with increasing IL concentration for both fabricated ILs.
For [N444Bn][MA], the extraction efficiency of Y(III) reached approxi-
mately 95% when the extractant concentration reached 0.035 M. In
the case of [N444Bn]2[DDA], a higher extraction efficiency (i.e., 98%)
was realized with a much lower IL concentration (i.e., 0.018 M),
½Mꢀi−½Mꢀt
E ¼
D ¼
ꢁ 100%
ð1Þ
ð2Þ
½Mꢀi
½Mꢀi−½Mꢀt
½Mꢀt
½Mꢀaq
S ¼
β ¼
ꢁ 100%
ð3Þ
ð4Þ
½MꢀILs
D1
D2
where [M]i and [M]t represent the initial and final concentrations of
REEs in the aqueous phase, D1 and D2 are the distribution ratios of REE
3