7466
K. Araki et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 7465–7468
1
force on the complexation of the biscalix[4]arene, we
designed a new biscalix[4]arene 2 with four phenol units
that will interact with the peripheral protons of a
disk-shaped guest in an edge-to-face manner. If the
edge-to-face type interaction is the predominant inter-
action as the intermolecular attractive force for the
complexation with the cationic guests, 2 would show
enhanced inclusion ability for the cationic guests
because the phenol units in 2 provide increasing p-
basicity compared with the propoxybenzene units in 1.
We now report the synthesis and the inclusion proper-
ties of the biscalix[4]arene 2.
spectral evidence and elemental analysis. The H NMR
spectrum of 2 shows two sets of doublets for the
ArCH2Ar methylene protons, indicating that both of
the two calix[4]arene skeletons adopt the cone
conformation.
The inclusion properties of 2 to N-methylpyridinium
(4) iodide were examined using 1H NMR measure-
ments. It is reported that the chemical shifts for the
protons in the quaternary ammonium ions are only
slightly shifted to a higher magnetic field in the pres-
ence of calix[4]arenes, and the cation-p interaction
between the calix[4]arenes and the cationic guests is
quite weak.12 The H NMR spectrum of 4 iodide (10.0
1
Pr
Pr
mM) in the presence of 2 (5.0 mM), on the other hand,
gave two separated peaks for each proton at 25°C in
CDCl3, which are assigned to the complexed and
uncomplexed 4. These peaks did not coalesce into an
average peak even at 130°C in 1,1,2,2-tetra-
chloroethane-d2. This remarkably high coalescence tem-
perature, Tc, reveals that the dynamic process during
the complexation and the decomplexation is much
slower than the NMR time scale, suggesting that 4 is
tightly encapsulated in the inner sphere of 2 and the
complex is quite stable.
O
O
O
RO
OR
O
OR
Pr
RO
O
O
Pr
1: R = n-Pr
2: R = H
The peaks for all the protons in 4 were shifted to the
upper magnetic field upon complexation, i.e. the chemi-
cal shifts of the a-, b-, g- and N-methyl protons in the
complexed 4 were 3.82, 4.08, 4.91 and 1.61 ppm and
those in the free 4 were 9.38, 8.12, 8.48 and 4.73 ppm,
respectively. These significant upfield shifts rationalized
by the shielding effect of the benzene rings in 2 imply
that 4 is included in the inner sphere of 2. Indeed, these
upfield shifts caused by the complexation were not
observed for nonionic guests such as pyridine, picoline,
benzene or toluene. The essential cationic charge in the
guests establishes the significant contribution of the
cation-p interaction to the formation of the complex in
2.
The biscalix[4]arene 2 was synthesized from cone-25,27-
dibenzyloxycalix[4]arene14 3a according to Scheme 1.
The products were identified by IR, H NMR and mass
1
OR1
OR2
CH2
CH2
2
X
3a: R1 = Bn, R2 = H, X = H
3b:
3c:
3d:
3e:
R1 = Bn, R2 = H, X = Br
R1 = Bn, R2 = Pr, X = Br
R1 = Bn, R2 = Pr, X = OH
R1 = H, R2 = Pr, X = OH
The association constants Ka of 1 and 2 for 4 picrate
were estimated using UV–vis spectroscopy. For exam-
ple, the UV–vis spectra of 4 gave an absorbance maxi-
mum at 361 nm in the absence of 2 in CHCl3. With the
addition of 2, the absorbance at 361 nm decreased and
that at 378 nm assigned to the complex increased. This
bathochromic shift indicates that 4 and the picrate
anion form a separated ion pair and the picrate is left
outside of 2. This behavior of 2 as a molecular capsule
is characterized by the steric shielding of 4 from contact
to the picrate. The plot of the absorbance versus [2]/
[guest] gave a gradual curve indicating the 1:1 stoi-
chiometry of the host and guest for the complex. The
Ka values were determined by the curve fit method for
these plots using the computer-assisted nonlinear least-
square procedure. The Ka for the complex of 1 with 4
was 1.55×104 dm3 mol−1, whereas that of 2 was 5.13×
106 dm3 mol−1, which is greater by 330-fold than that of
1. Obviously, this significant enhancement in Ka is
attributed to the increasing p-basicity of the flattened
3f: R1 = Bn, R2 = Pr, X = COOH
3g:
3h:
R1 = Bn, R2 = Pr, X = CH2OH
R1 = H, R2 = Pr, X = CH2Br
iii, iv, v
i
ii
vi
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
85 %
97 %
95 %
80 %
iii, vii
97 %
viii
vi
3f
3g
3h
91 %
82 %
ix
3e + 3h
2
38 %
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2. Reagents and conditions: (i) Br2,
CHCl3, 0°C; (ii) n-PrBr, NaH, DMF, 0°C; (iii) n-BuLi, THF,
−78°C, 1 h; (iv) B(OCH3)3; (v) AcOH, H2O2; (vi) TMSBr,
CHCl3, rt, 1 h; (vii) CO2; (viii) LiAlH4, THF, reflux, 24 h; (ix)
Cs2CO3, THF, reflux, 2 days.