Bidirectional Tandem Ligation
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 122, No. 18, 2000 4255
the conformational and biological effects of pseudoproline
replacements in proline-rich helical peptides.
Results and Discussion
CfN Three-Segment Tandem Ligation. The strategy for
the CfN tandem ligation of three unprotected peptide segments
by a thiaproline and then an oxaproline ligation is shown in
Figure 2. For convenience, these segments are designated in
the NfC direction as an amino (N) segment bearing a CT-
glycoaldehyde, a middle (M) segment carrying both a CT-
glycoaldehyde ester and an NT-Ser or NT-Thr, and a carboxyl
(C) segment bearing an NT-Cys.
Model studies were employed to optimize the tandem ligation
conditions (data not shown). A two-stage thiaproline ligation
of the C-segment (Cys-Phe-Lys-Ile-OH) and M-segment (Ser-
Leu-Ile-Leu-Asn-Gly-OCH2CHO 10a) was found to be optimal
in two-stage aqueous buffers first at pH 5.3 for 10 h, and then
at pH 6.5 for 20 h. At pH 5.3, HPLC monitoring showed two
major intermediates as the R,S-epimers of thiazolidine-ester
which were converted via an O,N-acyl shift at pH 6.6 after 20
h in 86% yield to a single amide product, an SPro-containing
MC-segment (Ser-Leu-Ile-Leu-Asn-Gly-SPro-Phe-Lys-Ile-OH).
Adjusting the ligation condition to pH 6.6 at the second stage
accelerated the O,N-acyl rearrangement without observable side
reactions due to the thiazolidine-ester hydrolysis or random
intramolecular acyl transfer reaction that occurs at pH > 6.6.
Furthermore, under these conditions, inter-or intramolecular
oxaproline ligation of M-segment 10a forming oligomers or
cyclic peptides, respectively, was not observed.
The MC segment product was purified by HPLC and then
subjected to an oxaproline ligation with the N-segment (Asp-
Ser-Phe-Gly-OCH2CHO 9a) in a pyridine-acetic acid mixture
(1:1, mol/mol). The oxaproline ligation was completed in 35 h
to afford in 78% yield the three-segment ligated NMC product
(Asp-Ser-Phe-Gly-OPro-Leu-Ile-Leu-Asn-Gly-SPro-Phe-Lys-
Ile-OH) with two pseudoprolines. No oxazolidine-ester inter-
mediates were observed. It should be noted that the three-
segment tandem ligation scheme was simplified by the absence
of a protection or deprotection step between each ligation.
Syntheses of unprotected C-segments 12a-d were straight-
forward using conventional Boc chemistry on a commercially
available resin 11, but N- and M-segments required the use of
an acetal resin 6 (Figure 3).42,43 N-segments 9a and 9b were
synthesized using Fmoc chemistry on the cyclic acetal resin 6
as carboxyl terminal (CT)-1,2-diol precursors 7a and 7b which
were then quantitatively converted to the corresponding aldehyde
by sodium periodate in aqueous buffers at pH 4. However,
syntheses of M-segments 10a-c or any N-segments with NT-
Figure 2. CfN approach of three-segment tandem ligation. (i)
thiaproline ligation in aqueous buffers. (ii) oxaproline ligation in
pyridine-acetic mixtures. N ) Asp-Ser-Phe-Gly-OCH2CHO 9a; M )
Ser-Leu-Ile-Leu-Asn-Gly-OCH2CHO 10a; C ) Cys-Phe-Lys-Ile-OH
12a.
5c (Figure 1). The pseudoproline formed at the ligation site is
a novel proline mimetic that retains the amide peptide backbone
but contains an additional C2-hydroxymethyl moiety. The newly
created stereocenter C2 at the ψPro ring is an R-epimer due to
the A1,3-effect of chiral CR at the NT-Cys 2a, NT-Ser 2b, or
NT-Thr 2c peptide.39,40
Thiaproline ligation can be distinguished from oxazolidine
ligation through the use of different solvents and reaction
conditions. Thiaproline ligation between CT-glycoaldehyde 1
and NT-Cys 2a proceeds efficiently in both aqueous conditions
and nonaqueous pyridine-acetic acid mixtures. In contrast,
oxaproline ligation with NT-Ser 2b or NT-Thr 2c peptides is
not observed in aqueous solutions and requires the use of nearly
anhydrous conditions such as pyridine-acetic acid mixtures.39,41
Even under such nonaqueous conditions, thiaproline ligation is
>1000-fold faster than oxaproline ligation. This type of solvent-
driven regioselectivity could be exploited for a tandem ligation
strategy, in which three or more unprotected peptide segments
are coupled without a protection scheme (Figure 2). Since a
ψPro has a cis enhancement on the Xaa-ψPro bond,30,39
a
tandem ligation strategy would also enable the study of the
conformational effects of these two novel pseudoprolines in
polyproline-helical peptides such as Bac 7.
In this paper, we describe the development of a bidirectional
tandem pseudoproline ligation strategy for the synthesis of
polyproline helical peptide analogues of Bac 7 through thiapro-
line or oxaproline bonds. Furthermore, we have also determined
(29) Kern, D.; Schutkowski, M.; Drakenberg, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 8403-8408.
(30) (a) Dumy, P.; Keller, M.; Ryan, D. E.; Rohwedder, B.; Wo¨hr, T.;
Mutter, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 918-925. (b) Keller, M.; Sager,
C.; Dumy, P.; Schutkowsky, M.; Fischer, G. S.; Mutter, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 2714-2720.
(36) Seebach, D.; Sommerfeld, T.; Jiang, Q.; Venanzi, L. M. HelV. Chim.
Acta 1994, 77, 1313-1330.
(31) (a) Eberhardt, E. S.; Panasik, N. P., Jr.; Raines, R. T. J. Am Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 12261-12266. (b) Holmgren, S. K.; Taylor, K. M.;
Bretscher, L. E.; Raines, R. T. Nature 1998, 392, 666-667.
(32) (a) Pattaroni, C.; Lucietto, P.; Goodman, M.; Yamamoto, G.; Vale,
W.; Moroder, L.; Gazero, L.; Gohring, W.; Schmied, B.; Wunsch, E. Int.
J. Pept. Protein Res. 1990, 36, 401-417. (b) Mieke, D. F.; Pattaroni, C.;
Delaet, N.; Toy, A.; Goodman, M.; Tancredi, T.; Motta, A.; Temussi, P.
A.; Moroder, L.; Bovermann, C.; Wunsch, E. Ibid. 1990, 36, 418-432.
(33) (a) Mutter, M.; Nefzi, A.; Sato. T.; Sun, X.; Wahl, F.; Wohr, T.
Peptide Res. 1995, 8, 145-153. (b) Wo¨hr, T.; Wahl, F.; Nefzi, A.;
Rohwedder, B.; Sato. T.; Sun, X.; Mutter, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 9218-9227. (c) Wo¨rhr, T.; Mutter, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
3847-3848.
(37) Budisa, N.; Minks, C.; Demange, P.; Lutz, J.; Huber, R.; Moroder,
L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 455-459.
(38) (a) Liu, C. F.; Tam, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4149-
4153. (b) Liu, C. F.; Tam, J. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91,
6584-6588. (c) Liu, C. F.; Chang, R.; Tam, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 307-312.
(39) Tam, J. P.; Miao, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9013-9022.
(40) Seebach, D.; Lamatsch, B.; Amstutz, R.; Beck, A. K.; Dobloer, M.;
Egli, M.; Fitzi, R.; Gautschi, M.; Herrado´n, B.; Hidber, P.; Irwin, J. J.;
Locher, R.; Maestro, M.; Maetzke, T.; Mourio`o, A.; Pfammatter, E.; Plattner,
D. A.; Schickli, C.; Schweizer, W. B.; Seiler, P.; Stucky, G. HelV. Chim.
Acta, 1992, 75, 913-934.
(41) Tam, J. P.; Rao, C.; Liu, C. F.; Shao, J. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res.
1995, 45, 209-216.
(42) Mitchell, A. R.; Erickson, B. W.; Ryabstev, M. N.; Hodges, R. S.;
Merrifield, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 7357-7362.
(43) Botti, P.; Pallin, D. P.; Tam, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
10018-10024.
(34) (a) Konopelski, J. P.; Filonova, L. K.; Olmstead, M. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 4305-4306. (b) Konopelski, J. P.; Wei, Y.; Olmstead, M.
M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 119, 5148-5151.
(35) Figuera, N. D.; Alkorta, I.; Garc´ıa-Lo´pez, M.; T.; Herranz, R.;
Gonza´lez-Mun˜iz, R. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 7841-7856.