presence of an additional hydrogen bond, albeit most likely
a weaker one, between the ketone carbonyl oxygen and the
Tyr26 hydroxyl group is suggested in some but not all
ketoamide ligands. The trimethoxyphenyl ring (or the tert-
alkyl group in related compounds14a) interacts with a lipo-
philic wall of the pocket that includes the Ile90 and Ile97
side chains. In the case of unbranched esters such as GPI-
1046, the arylalkyl side chain runs out of the primary site
through a shallow hydrophobic groove where the aryl ring
resides in a promiscuous secondary binding site. For
compounds such as V-10,367, the additional branch of the
side chain tends to make self-binding interactions with the
trimethoxyphenyl ring as well as fill the void between that
ring and the Phe46 phenyl on the opposite wall of the active
site.12,14a
Inhibition of the rotamase activity of FKBP12 was
measured as described previously,18 except that the assay
was run at 10 °C instead of 0 °C to avoid water condensation
on the walls of the cuvette. Table 1 shows FKBP12 rotamase
inhibition data for a simple series of prolyl amide esters.
Both difluoroamides, 9a and 9b, show activity that is
comparable to or somewhat better than that of the corre-
sponding ketoamides, 10a and 10b. It is important to note
that the methyleneamides, 11a and 11b, showed no detectable
inhibitory activity at 10 µM,19 suggesting that the fluorine
atoms are not maintaining ligand binding energy simply by
occupying steric space but are most likely participating in
specific interactions in the FKBP12 active site.
Table 1. FKBP12 Rotamase Inhibition Data for 9a-11b
compd
X
Y
Ki, µM
9a
F2
O
H2
F2
O
N
N
N
CH
CH
CH
0.872
4.00
nia
1.30
2.20
nia
10a
11a
9b
10b
11b
H2
a ni: no detectable inhibition at 10 µM.
diimide coupling of the intermediates 8 and 2 shown in
Scheme 1.14a Methyleneamides 11a and 11b were similarly
made by the coupling of 8 with commercially available 3,4,5-
trimethoxyphenylacetic acid. Several attempts to prepare 2,2-
difluoromethylene carboxylates of 2-tert-alkyl-containing
acids or esters analogous to 2 were unsuccessful, probably
as a result of steric constraints against difluorination.
Because the compounds of interest contain benzylic
halogens that are in a para-relationship to an electron-
donating methoxy group, it was important to ensure their
hydrolytic stability. In this regard, a representative example
(9o) was found to be unchanged over 27 h in 9:1 phosphate-
buffered saline/DMSO containing bovine serum albumin at
pH 7.4 and in fetal calf serum, both at room temperature.
X-ray and NMR structural data shows that, for compounds
that mimic the FKBP12-binding portion of FK506 such as
V-10,36712 and GPI-1046,17 the pipecolate or proline ring
lies at the bottom of the largely hydrophobic binding pocket,
whose floor includes a Trp59 indole ring. Important hydrogen-
bonding interactions exist between the amide carbonyl
oxygen and the Tyr82 hydroxyl group and between the ester
carbonyl oxygen and the Ile56 backbone amide NH. The
The FKBP12 inhibitory activities of a series of branched
ester prolyl and pipecolyl difluoroamides are shown in Table
2. The activities of corresponding pipecolyl and proline esters
are comparable. The exceptions are compounds 9o (Ki )
19 nM) and 9n (Ki ) 104 nM), and 9h (Ki ) 40 nM) and
Table 2. FKBP12 Rotamase Inhibition Data for 9c-o
(9) (a) Harper, S.; Bilsland, J.; Young, L.; Bristow, L.; Boyce, S.; Mason,
G.; Rigby, M.; Hewson, L.; Smith, D.; O’Donnell, R.; O’Connor, D.; Hill,
R. G.; Evans, D.; Swain, C.; Williams, B.; Hefti, F. Neuroscience 1999,
88, 257. (b) Becker, D. B.; Jensen, J. N.; Myckatyn, T. M.; Doolabh, V.
B.; Hunter, D. A.; Mackinnon, S. E. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2000, 16, 613.
(10) Sauer, H.; Francis, J. M.; Jiang, H.; Hamilton, G. S.; Steiner, J. P.
Brain Res. 1999, 842, 109.
(11) Hasler, D. W.; Jensen, L. T.; Zerbe, O.; Winge, D. R.; Vasak, M.
Biochemistry 2000, 39, 14567.
(12) Armistead, D. M.; Badia, M. C.; Deininger, D. D.; Duffy, J. P.;
Saunders: J. O.; Tung, R. D.; Thomson, J. A.; Decenzo, M. T.; Futer, O.;
Livingston, D. J.; Murcko, M. A.; Yamashita, M. M.; Navia, M. A. Acta
Crystallogr., Sect. D 1995, 51, 522.
compd
y
n
m
Ki, µM
9c
9d
9e
9f
9g
9h
9i
9j
9k
9l
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
0
2
2
3
3
0.084
0.174
0.642
1.00
0.170
0.040
0.120
0.090
0.059
0.060
0.050
0.104
0.019
(13) Taylor, M. J.; Hoffman, T. Z.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J. T.; Lerner, R.
A.; Janda, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12783.
(14) (a) Holt, D. A.; Luengo, J. I.; Yamashita, D. S.; Oh, H. J.; Konialian,
A. L.; Yen, H. K.; Rozamus, L. W.; Brandt, M.; Bossard, M. J.; Levy, M.
A.; Eggleston, D. S.; Liang, J.; Schultz, L. W.; Stout, T. J.; Clardy, J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9925. (b) Dubowchik, G. M.; Ditta, J.; Herbst,
J. J.; Bollini, S.; Vinitsky, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 559.
(15) Davies-Coleman, M. T.; Faulkner, D. J.; Dubowchik, G. M.; Roth,
G. P.; Polson, C.; Fairchild, C. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5925.
9m
9n
9o
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 25, 2001
3989