G. Ceyhan et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 142 (2015) 8–14
9
p-nitrophenylsulphate anions and potassium cations. Each K+ ions
Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry for the complex (Å, °).
is 8-coordinate with approximate square antiprism geometry [2].
In this study, polymeric potassium complex of p-nitrophenol
(KNP) was prepared and characterized by spectroscopic and ana-
lytical methods. Molecular structure of the complex was deter-
mined by single crystal X-ray diffraction study. Electronic and
electrochemical properties of the complex were also investigated.
D–HÁ Á ÁA
D–H
HÁ Á ÁA
2.00 (2)
1.97 (2)
DÁ Á ÁA
D–HÁ Á ÁA
O4–H4AÁ Á ÁO3*
0.79 (2)
0.84 (2)
2.7863 (13)
2.7781 (13)
172.7 (18)
160.1 (17)
O4–H4BÁ Á ÁO3**
Symmetry codes.
*
Àx, Ày, Àz.
**
x, y À 1, z.
Experimental
Table 3
General methods
Bond lengths and angles for the complex (Å, °).
K1–O4
K1–O3
2.6652 (10)
2.7683 (9)
2.7819 (10)
2.8308 (9)
2.8493 (9)
2.8704 (9)
2.8972 (10)
2.9813 (10)
2.8309 (9)
2.9813 (10)
2.8705 (9)
2.7819 (10)
O2–K1vii
2.8493 (9)
All starting materials and organic solvents were purchased from
commercial sources and used as received, unless noted otherwise.
IR spectrum was performed on a Perkin Elmer, Spectrum 400 (res-
olution; 0.5–4 cmÀ1). CHN analysis was performed using a CE-440
Elemental analyzer. The 1H- and 13C NMR were performed using a
BrukerAvance 400. Mass spectrum was recorded on a Thermo
Fisher Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled to an Advion
TriVersa Nanomate injection system.
O2–K1iv
O2–N1
O1–N1
O3–C4
N1–C1
C1–C6
C1–C2
C2–C3
C3–C4
C4–C5
C5–C6
2.8972 (10)
1.2484 (14)
1.2430 (14)
1.2891 (14)
1.4187 (15)
1.3983 (17)
1.4006 (16)
1.3735 (17)
1.4293 (16)
1.4292 (16)
1.3693 (17)
K1–O4i
K1–O1ii
K1–O2iii
K1–O3iv
K1–O2v
K1–O1v
O1–K1ii
O1–K1iv
O3–K1i
O4–K1iv
X-ray structures solution and refinement for the polymeric complex
O4–K1–O3
146.88 (3)
135.11 (3)
77.05 (3)
73.16 (3)
126.34 (3)
85.21 (3)
74.97 (3)
76.12 (3)
147.90 (3)
96.75 (3)
77.20 (3)
130.91 (3)
58.85 (3)
73.39 (3)
152.11 (3)
72.63 (3)
89.17 (3)
111.82 (3)
143.95 (3)
85.11 (3)
88.25 (3)
107.77 (3)
72.57 (3)
69.23 (3)
144.549 (14)
118.04 (3)
O3iv–K1–O1v
O2v–K1–O1v
N1–O1–K1ii
N1–O1–K1iv
K1ii–O1–K1vi
N1–O2–K1vii
N1–O2–K1iv
K1vii–O2–K1iv
C4–O3–K1
C4–O3–K1i
K1–O3–K1i
K1–O4–K1iv
O1–N1–O2
O1–N1–C1
O2–N1–C1
C6–C1–C2
72.43 (3)
43.26 (3)
161.62 (8)
93.89 (7)
88.22 (2)
149.50 (8)
97.82 (7)
94.89 (3)
106.54 (7)
122.55 (7)
91.71 (2)
O4–K1–O4i
O3–K1–O4i
O4–K1–O1ii
O3–K1–O1ii
O4i–K1–O1ii
O4–K1–O2iii
O3–K1–O2iii
O4i–K1–O2iii
O1ii–K1–O2iii
O4–K1–O3iv
O3–K1–O3iv
O4i–K1–O3iv
O1ii–K1–O3iv
O2iii–K1–O3iv
O4–K1–O2v
O3–K1–O2v
O4i–K1–O2v
O1ii–K1–O2v
O2iii–K1–O2v
O3iv–K1–O2v
O4–K1–O1v
O3–K1–O1v
O4i–K1–O1v
O1ii–K1–O1v
O2iii–K1–O1v
X-ray diffraction data for the complex was collected at 100(2) K
on a Bruker ApexII CCD diffractometer using Mo-K
a radiation
(k = 0.71073 Å). Data reduction was performed using Bruker SAINT.
SHELXTL was used to solve and refine the structures [7]. The struc-
tures were solved by direct methods and refined on F2 using all the
reflections [8]. All the non-hydrogen atoms were refined using
anisotropic atomic displacement parameters and hydrogen atoms
bonded to carbon were inserted at calculated positions using a rid-
ing model. Hydrogen atoms bonded to water oxygen atom (O4)
were located from difference maps and refined with temperature
factors riding on the carrier atom. Details of the crystal data and
refinement are given Table 1. Hydrogen bond parameters are given
in Table 2 and bond lengths and angles are given in Table 3.
95.94 (3)
120.96 (10)
119.66 (10)
119.36 (10)
120.99 (11)
119.41 (10)
119.56 (11)
119.46 (11)
121.43 (11)
121.71 (11)
121.31 (10)
116.98 (10)
121.54 (11)
119.60 (11)
C6–C1–N1
C2–C1–N1
C3–C2–C1
Preparation of the polymeric complex (KNP)
C2–C3–C4
O3–C4–C5
O3–C4–C3
C5–C4–C3
C6–C5–C4
C5–C6–C1
p-Nitrophenol (1 mmol, 0.139 g) in acetone (10 ml) and K2CO3
(0.5 mmol, 0.069 g) in acetone (5 ml) were mixed and refluxed
Table 1
Crystallographic data.
Symmetry codes.
Identification code
K1
i
Àx, y + 1/2, Àz + 1/2.
ii
Àx + 1, Ày, Àz + 1.
Empirical formula
Formula weight
T/K
Crystal system
Space group
C6H6KNO4
195.22
100(2)
Monoclinic
P21/c
iii
Àx + 1, y À 1/2, Àz + 1/2.
Àx, y À 1/2, Àz + 1/2.
x À 1, Ày + 1/2, z À 1/2.
x + 1, Ày + 1/2, z + 1/2.
Àx + 1, y + 1/2, Àz + 1/2.
iv
v
vi
vii
Unit cell
a (Å)
b (Å)
10.4828 (2)
7.2887 (1)
11.2186 (2)
90
117.682 (1)
90
759.06 (2)
4
1.708
for 4 h at 358 K. An intense light brown coloration appeared imme-
diately. After one week, well-formed light brown crystals grew on
the walls. A single crystal of dimensions 0.33 Â 0.23 Â 0.16 mm3
was selected from mother liquor and mounted for X-ray diffraction
study at low temperature.
c (Å)
a
(°)
b (°)
c
(°)
Volume (Å3)
Yield: 88%, color: light brown, M.p.: 127 °C. Anal. (%) Found
Z
Calculated density (g/cm3)
Crystal size (mm3)
(Calculated for C6H6KNO4):
C 36.95(36.92), H 3.10(3.07), N
7.18(7.20). 1H NMR (d, ppm): 6.25–7.55 (4H, Ar–H). 13C NMR (d,
ppm): 115.20–149.10 (Ar–C). Mass Spectrum (LC/MS APCI):
m/z 196 [M+1]+ (40%), 195 [M]+ (100%). FTIR (KBr, cmÀ1): 2960
0.33 Â 0.23 Â 0.16
Abs. coeff. (mmÀ1
Refl. collected
)
0.670
6878
1894 [0.0204]
Ind. Refl. [Rint
]
m
(C–H)aromatic, 1455 m(NO2), 1345 m(phenolic C–O). UV–vis (kmax
R1, wR2 [I > 2
r
(I)]
0.0245, 0.0637
0.0274, 0.0655
1.064
max), nm). EtOH; 344(0.42 Â 103), 459(0.36 Â 103), MeOH;
R1, wR2 (all data)
(e
Goodness-of-fit on F2
319(1.19 Â 103),
449(0.61 Â 103),
DMF,
316(0.67 Â 103),
CCDC number
987883
448(0.35 Â 103), Ethylacetate; 349(0.19 Â 103), 454(0.13 Â 103).