5446
R. Van Deun et al. / Polyhedron 26 (2007) 5441–5447
t, CH3); 1.26 (26H, m, CH2); 2.04 (2H, m, CH2); 2.69 (3H,
s, CH3-aryl); 4.92 (2H, t, N+-CH2); 7.94 (2H, d, H-aryl,
the hydrated nitrate or chloride salt. All the reactions were
carried out in ethanol. The complexes were recrystallized
from ethanol:water (1:1). Analysis results for neodymium
complex 3: yield 20% (0.33 g). IR (cmꢀ1, KBr): 3059 (w),
2932 (m), 2849 (m), 1640 (sh, alkene C@C), 1612
(s, C@O stretching), 1595 (s, C@N), 1573 (s, aryl C@C),
1530 (m, C@C stretching), 1491 (s, C@O stretching and
CH bending), 1434 (m), 1396 (m), 1361 (m), 1322 (m),
1231 (w), 1162 (m), 1053 (m), 945 (m), 837 (m), 759 (m),
703 (m), 607 (m). CHN Elemental Anal. Calc. for
C99H101N10O8Nd (1703.19 g molꢀ1): C, 69.82; H, 5.98; N,
8.22. Found: C, 69.44; H, 5.91; N, 8.20%. Analysis results
for erbium complex 4: yield 63% (2.16 g). IR (cmꢀ1, KBr):
3049 (w), 2916 (m), 2847 (m), 1642 (sh, alkene C@C), 1616
(s, C@O stretching), 1593 (s, C@N), 1577 (s, aryl C@C),
1528 (m, C@C stretching), 1500 (s, C@O stretching and
CH bending), 1436 (s), 1394 (m), 1371 (s), 1325 (m), 1233
(w), 1160 (s), 1057 (m), 942 (m), 835 (m), 766 (s), 694
(m), 609 (m). CHN Elemental Anal. Calc. for
C99H101N10O8Er (1726.21 g molꢀ1): C, 68.88; H, 5.90; N,
8.11. Found: C, 69.02; H, 5.77; N, 8.05%. Analysis results
J0 = 6 Hz); 9.39 (2H, d, H-aryl, J0 = 6 Hz). IR (cmꢀ1
,
KBr): 3009 (m), 2913 (s), 2846 (s), 1639 (s), 1568 (w),
1519 (m), 1470 (s), 1383 (w), 1322 (w), 1176 (m), 1045
(w), 974 (w), 821 (m), 713 (m), 555 (w). Mass (m/z, EI,
70 eV): M+ = C22H40N+; 319 ([M+1]+, 4); 318 (M+, 25);
317 (M+ꢀ1H, 97); 316 (M+ꢀ2H, 44); 288 (M+ꢀC2H6,
42); 274 (M+ꢀC3H8, 48); 260 (M+ꢀC4H10, 55); 246
(M+ꢀC5H12, 55); 232 (M+ꢀC6H14, 51); 218 (M+ꢀC7H16,
42); 190 (M+ꢀC9H20, 40); 162 (M+ꢀC11H24, 40); 134
(M+ꢀC13H28, 72); 121 (M+ꢀC14H29, 53); 120 (M+ꢀ
C14H30, 61); 107 (M+ꢀC15H31, 100); 94 (M+ꢀC16H32,
52); 93 (M+ꢀC16H33, 36). CHN Elemental Anal. Calc.
for C22H40BrN (398.47 g molꢀ1): C, 66.31; H, 10.12; N,
3.52. Found: C, 66.20; H, 10.32; N, 3.37%.
The 1-hexadecyl-4-methylpyridinium bromide 1 was
then condensed with 4-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde via a
Knoevenagel-type reaction. The reagents were heated in
absolute ethanol with piperidine as the catalyst. The crude
hemicyanine bromide 2 was recrystallized twice from an
ethanol:hexane mixture. Yield: 71% (18.8 g). 1H NMR
(dH, CDCl3, 400 MHz): 0.87 (3H, t, CH3); 1.26 (26H, m,
CH2); 1.93 (2H, quintet, CH2); 3.06 (6H, s, (CH3)2N);
4.64 (2H, t, N+-CH2); 6.68 (2H, d, H-aryl, J0 = 9 Hz);
6.86 (1H, –CH@, Jtrans = 16 Hz); 7.52 (2H, d, H-aryl,
J0 = 9 Hz); 7.62 (1H, –CH@, Jtrans = 16 Hz); 7.88 (2H, d,
H-aryl, J0 = 7 Hz); 8.94 (2H, d, H-aryl, J0 = 7 Hz).13C
NMR (dC, CDCl3, 100.6 MHz): 14.1 (CH3); 22.6 (CH2);
26.1 (CH2); 29.05 (CH2); 29.30 (CH2); 29.35 (CH2); 29.50
(CH2); 29.55 (CH2); 29.60 (CH2); 29.65 (CH2); 31.6
(CH2); 31.9 (CH2); 40.1 ((CH3)2N); 60.2 (N+-CH2);
111.9; 116.3; 122.2 (quaternary C); 122.7 (alkene C);
130.6; 142.9; 152.2 (quaternary C); 154.0 (quaternary C).
IR (cmꢀ1, KBr): 3000 (w), 2912 (s), 2852 (m), 1641 (m,
alkene C@C), 1591 (s, aryl C@C), 1526 (s, aryl C@C),
1467 (m), 1430 (m), 1362 (m), 1330 (m), 1161 (s), 827
(w), 717 (w), 518 (w). Mass (m/z, EI, 70 eV):
Mþ ¼ C31H49N2þ; 451 ([M+1]+, 7); 450 (M+, 5); 448
(M+ꢀ2H, 2); 225 (M+ꢀC16H32, 18); 224 (M+ꢀC16H33,
100); 223 (M+ꢀC16H34, 52). CHN Elemental Anal. Calc.
for C31H49BrN2 (529.65 g molꢀ1): C, 70.30; H, 9.32; N,
5.29. Found: C, 69.94; H, 9.75; N, 4.88%.
for ytterbium complex 5: yield 52% (1.80 g). IR (cmꢀ1
,
KBr): 3432 (w), 3061 (m), 2928 (w), 1644 (sh, alkene
C@C), 1617 (s, C@O stretching), 1591 (s, C@N), 1573 (s,
aryl C@C), 1529 (m, C@C stretching), 1498 (s, C@O
stretching and CH bending), 1432 (m), 1400 (w), 1365
(m), 1321 (w), 1233 (w), 1162 (m), 1056 (w), 950 (m), 840
(m), 760 (m), 694 (m), 614 (m). CHN Elemental Anal. Calc.
for C99H101N10O8Yb (1731.99 g molꢀ1): C, 68.65; H, 5.88;
N, 8.09. Found: C, 68.33; H, 5.96; N, 8.00%.
4.3. Crystallography
Red single crystals of the (E)-N-dodecyl-N0,N0-dimethyl-
amino-stilbazolium tetrakis(1-phenyl-3-methyl-4-benzoyl-
5-pyrazolonato) lanthanum(III) complex were obtained
by slow evaporation of diethylether into a solution of the
compound in dimethylformamide. X-ray intensity data
were collected on a SMART 6000 diffractometer equipped
˚
with CCD detector using Cu Ka radiation (k = 1.54178 A).
The images were interpreted and integrated with the pro-
gram SAINT from Bruker [38]. Crystal data can be found
in Table 1.
Only the trans-product (E) is formed. There was no evi-
dence for the formation of the cis-isomer, probably because
of steric hindrance by the aromatic groups. The 1-hexade-
The structure was solved by direct methods and refined
by full-matrix least-squares on F2 using the SHELXTL pro-
gram package [39]. Non-hydrogen atoms were anisotropi-
cally refined and the hydrogen atoms in the riding mode
with isotropic temperature factors fixed at 1.2 times Ueq
of the parent atoms (1.5 times for methyl groups).
cyl-4-methylpyridinium bromide is
a white powder,
whereas the hemicyanine bromide has a very intense
orange-red colour.
The lanthanide complexes 3–5 were formed by reaction
of the hemicyanine bromide 2 with the b-diketone 4-ben-
zoyl-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one and the appro-
priate lanthanide salt. First, the b-diketone was
deprotonated by an equivalent amount of NaOH, then,
the hemicyanine bromide and a lanthanide salt were added.
The molar ratio b-diketone:hemicyanine bromide:lantha-
nide salt was 4:1:1. For the lanthanide salt, one can use
Acknowledgements
R.V.D. and T.N.P.-V. are Postdoctoral Fellows of the
Fund for Scientific Research
(F.W.O. – Vlaanderen). Financial support by the F.W.O.
– Flanders (G.0117.03) and by the K.U.Leuven (GOA
03/03) is gratefully acknowledged. R.V.D. thanks the
– Flanders (Belgium)