using published procedures, a mixture of stereoisomers is
obtained. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge there
are no reports of chemistry of this kind concerning larger
cyclic systems. A diethyl phosphiteÀtriethylamine system
has been reported by Ohshiro and co-workers to result
only in partial dehalogenation of gem-dibromocyclopro-
panes, providing the monobromocyclopropane selectively.12
We applied these conditions to a TBS protected analogue
of the gem-dibromide 10, but no reaction was observed.9
Oshima and co-workers report the monodehalogenation
of gem-dibromocyclopropanes with a tributyltin hydride/
triethyl borane system,13 but the toxicity of tributyltin
hydride prompted us to investigate the use of tris-
(trimethylsilyl)silane, (TMS)3SiH, as an alternative redu-
cing agent. While the reduction of monobromides using
(TMS)3SiH is well documented by Chatgilialoglu and co-
workers,14 use of this reagent for the diastereoselective
monoreduction of gem-bromides has not been reported.
We rationalized that a system such as this, applied to the
monodehalogenation of gem-dibromide 10, might afford
the desired diastereoselectivity as follows: the carbon-
centered radical formed by abstraction of bromide by the
silyl radical equilibrates faster than hydride is delivered,
and the less hindered approach of the bulky (TMS)3SiH is
anti to the bulky DMIPS ether to provide the syn isomer
selectively (Scheme 4). Pleasingly, reduction of the gem-
dibromide 10 with 1.05 equiv of (TMS)3SiH in refluxing
benzene, with AIBN as a radical initiator, afforded a single
diastereomer exclusively (Scheme 4).15 The configuration
of the brominated center was assigned via analysis of the
(which was inseparable from any unreacted ketone 4) in
modest yields, but as a single diastereomer. The newly
formed asymmetric center was assigned via analysis of the
R-methine resonance in the 1H NMR spectrum, the cou-
pling constants of which were consistent with an axially
positioned proton. The observed diastereoselectivity was
justified by proposed 1,3-diaxial interactions between the
sterically demanding TBS ether and the incoming electro-
phile. Attempts to promote the complete consumption of
the TBS ketone 4, using an excess of allylic iodide 9 and/or
KHMDS, gave rise to complicated mixtures of products,
and so the diterpene 16 was typically isolated with the
ketone 4 impurity. Fortunately, after global deprotection
of the silyl ethers with an excess of TBAF, the diterpene
diol 8 was easily separated from any impurities (Scheme 5).
The diterpene diol 8 was then treated with sodium bor-
ohydride in a THF/methanol mixture to provide the
2S,3R,6S,9S,10R,13S,14S diastereomer17 1 of the pro-
posed structure of Prevezol C exclusively. The stereochem-
istry of the newly formed asymmetric center was assigned
as S, based on analysis of the coupling constants of the
hydroxymethine resonance, and was later confirmed by
X-ray crystallography (Scheme 5). The observed diaster-
eoselectivity was postulated to arise from coordination of
sodium borohydride tothe R-hydroxyl group, encouraging
hydride delivery syn to this moiety.
Scheme 4. Diastereoselective Monodehalogenation of
gem-Dibromide 10 to syn Bromohydrin 14
1
bromomethine proton resonance in the H NMR spec-
trum, which appears asa doublet of doublets withcoupling
constants of 12.4 and 4.0 Hz, indicative of axialÀaxial and
axialÀequatorial coupling (see Supporting Information
(SI)). The stereochemistry was later confirmed by X-ray
crystallography (Scheme 5).
In preparation for the key alkylation reaction, the syn
bromohydrin 14 was subjected to an allylic chlorination
reaction employing modified Massanet conditions;16
a
subsequent Finkelstein reaction using sodium iodide in
dry acetone provided the required allylic iodide 9, which
was typically used directly in the subsequent alkylation
reaction due to its instability (Scheme 5). TBS ketone 4 (see
SI) was treated with freshly prepared KHMDS and then
allylic iodide 9 to afford the requisite diterpene core 16
1
The H and 13C NMR spectra of diterpene 1 were
markedly different from the data for the natural product
(see SI). We thus concluded that the natural product must
have an alternative structure and turned our attention to
the synthesis of the other proposed diastereomer, Prevezol
C 2. Employing the previously established alkylation con-
ditions, and the enantiomer of ketone 4, ketone 17 (see SI),
the requisite diterpene core 18 was prepared diastereose-
lectively, though this material was inseparable from any
unreacted ketone 17 (Scheme 6). Global deprotection of
the silyl ethers using TBAF, followed by diastereoselective
(12) Hirao, T.; Masunaga, T.; Ohshiro, Y.; Agawa, T. J. Org. Chem.
1981, 46, 3745–3747.
(13) Miura, K.; Ichinose, Y.; Nozaki, K.; Fugami, K.; Oshima, K.;
Utimoto, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1989, 62, 143–147.
(14) (a) Ballestri, M.; Chatgilialoglu, C.; Clark, K. B.; Griller, D.; Giese,
B.; Kopping, B. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 678–683. (b) Chatgilialoglu, C.
ꢀ
Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 2310–2320. (c) Chatgilialoglu, C.; Lalevee, J.
Molecules 2012, 17, 527–555. (d) Chatgilialoglu, C.; Ferreri, C.; Gimisis,
T. Tris(trimethylsilyl)silane in Organic Synthesis. In The Chemistry
of Organic Silicon Compounds; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: 2003; pp
1539À1579.
1
(15) This reaction must be carefully followed by H NMR spectro-
scopy: if excess (TMS)3SiH is used, the over-reduced species is obtained.
The anti bromohydrin was not observed in the 1H NMR spectra of the
crude or purified product.
(16) Moreno-Dorado, F. J.; Guerra, F. M.; Manzano, F. L.; Aladro,
F. J.; Jorge, Z. D.; Massanet, G. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6691–
6693.
(17) Numbered in accordance with Roussis and co-workers; see:
Iliopoulou, D.; Mihopoulos, N.; Vagias, C.; Papazafiri, P.; Roussis,
V. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7667–7674.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C