Protective effects of 2-amino-5,6-dihydro-4h-1,3-thiazine and its derivative against radiation-induced hematopoietic and intestinal injury in mice

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/ijms19051530

Ionizing radiation (IR) acts as an external stimulating factor, when it acts on the body, it will activate NF-κB and cause the up-regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and induce a large amount of nitric oxide (NO) production. NO and other reactive nitrogen and oxygen species (RNS and ROS) can cause damage to biological molecules and affect their physiological functions. Our study investigated the protective role of 2-amino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazine hydrobromide (2-ADT) and 2-acetylamino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazine hydrobromide (2-AADT), two nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, against radiation-induced hematopoietic and intestinal injury in mice. Pretreatment with 2-ADT and 2-AADT improved the survival of mice exposed to a lethal dose of radiation, especially, the survival rate of the 2-ADT 20 mg/kg group was significantly higher than that of the vehicle group (p < 0.001). Our findings indicated that the radioprotective actions of 2-ADT and 2-AADT are achieved via accelerating hematopoietic system recovery, decreasing oxidative and nitrosative stress by enhancing the antioxidant defense system and reducing NO as well as peroxynitrite (ONOO?) content, and mitigating the radiation-induced DNA damage evaluated by comet assay. These results suggest that 2-ADT and 2-AADT may have great application potential in ameliorating the damages of radiotherapy.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/ijms19051530

International Journal of
Molecular Sciences
Article
Protective Effects of
2-Amino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazine and Its
Derivative against Radiation-Induced Hematopoietic
and Intestinal Injury in Mice
Yuanyuan Li, Shaofan Kong, Fujun Yang and Wenqing Xu *
Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical Collage,
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin 300192, China;
yuanyuanli0929@163.com (Y.L.); ksf226@126.com (S.K.); yangfj32@126.com (F.Y.)
* Correspondence: xuwenqing@irm-cams.ac.cn; Tel.: +86-022-8568-3049
ꢀꢁꢂꢀꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇ
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆ
Received: 25 April 2018; Accepted: 16 May 2018; Published: 21 May 2018
Abstract: Ionizing radiation (IR) acts as an external stimulating factor, when it acts on the body, it
will activate NF- B and cause the up-regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and induce
κ
a large amount of nitric oxide (NO) production. NO and other reactive nitrogen and oxygen species
(RNS and ROS) can cause damage to biological molecules and affect their physiological functions. Our
study investigated the protective role of 2-amino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazine hydrobromide (2-ADT)
and 2-acetylamino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazine hydrobromide (2-AADT), two nitric oxide synthase
inhibitors, against radiation-induced hematopoietic and intestinal injury in mice. Pretreatment with
2-ADT and 2-AADT improved the survival of mice exposed to a lethal dose of radiation, especially,
the survival rate of the 2-ADT 20 mg/kg group was significantly higher than that of the vehicle
group (p < 0.001). Our findings indicated that the radioprotective actions of 2-ADT and 2-AADT are
achieved via accelerating hematopoietic system recovery, decreasing oxidative and nitrosative stress
by enhancing the antioxidant defense system and reducing NO as well as peroxynitrite (ONOO−)
content, and mitigating the radiation-induced DNA damage evaluated by comet assay. These results
suggest that 2-ADT and 2-AADT may have great application potential in ameliorating the damages
of radiotherapy.
Keywords: 2-amino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazine hydrobromide (2-ADT); 2-acetylamino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-
thiazine hydrobromide (2-AADT); radioprotection; hematopoietic; intestinal injury
1. Introduction
Radiotherapy is an important treatment modality for various malignancies and severe diseases [1],
but these adverse side effects such as hematopoietic and gastrointestinal dysfunction even death
caused by radiation reduce the patients’ quality of life and limit their radiation therapy. Ionizing
radiation-induced injury is mediated either directly or indirectly through the radiolysis of water and
−
production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including hydroxyl radical (
·
OH), O2 and H2O2
[
2].
Furthermore, gamma-irradiation can enhance endogenous NO biosynthesis by iNOS from L-arginine in
− −
vivo [3,4]. NO can react rapidly with O2 to form ONOO , a potent cytotoxic oxidant. ROS as well as
ONOO− and other reactive nitrogen species (RNS) can attack virtually all components including
DNA, lipids and proteins, resulting in impaired cellular functions and enhanced inflammatory
responses [5–7]. Previous studies have proposed that ROS are the initiators and that NO and other RNS
are the effectors activating cytosolic signal transduction pathways in response to ionizing radiation [4,8].
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530; doi:10.3390/ijms19051530
www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
2 of 15
It is therefore increasingly necessary to develop effective compounds to protect the patients from
radiation-induced injury.
For a long period of time, radioprotective agents have been mostly concentrated on antioxidants
that are targeted for the scavenging of ROS, but less attention was given to compounds that alleviate
the nitrosative stress caused by nitric oxide and its derivatives. Published studies have shown
that ionizing radiation induces the expression and binding activity of NF-
ionizing radiation causes activation of NF- B in different tissues (such as spleen and bone marrow)
in vivo [10]. Moreover, NF- B is involved in the induction of iNOS gene [11], which increases
the production of NO [ ]. Therefore, NO scavenger or iNOS inhibitor may weaken the nitrosative
κB [9], and high-dose
κ
κ
6
stress after irradiation by reducing the content of NO in the tissues, thus exerting radiation protection.
Many facts confirm the practical significance of chemical agents in achieving radioprotection under
the NO-dependent mechanism. It has been reported that the radiation protection of NOS inhibitors
afforded by manipulations of NO levels was due to bone marrow protection, which was mediated
by changes in blood flow and oxygen delivery [12]. Suppression of NOS activity in vivo by NOS
inhibitors results in an increase in the number of stem and early progenitor cells in the bone marrow
and of neutrophils in the blood after irradiation [2,13]. Evidence that the leading mechanism
of the radioprotective effect of NOS inhibitors among isothiourea derivatives is the induction of
hypoxia was provided by Filimonova MV in 2014 [14]. Drugs such as catecholamines, serotonin and
other vasoactive agents also provide radiation protection by inducing tissue hypoxia through their
pharmacological activities in bone marrow or spleen [15–17]. the above studies have prompted us to
consider chemical NOS inhibitors as possible directions for finding new radioprotector.
2-amino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazine hydrobromide (2-ADT) and 2-acetylamino-5,6-dihydro- linebreak
4H-1,3-thiazine hydrobromide (2-AADT), which are potent inhibitors of mammalian NO synthases,
exhibited vasopressor action in experimental models of rat endotoxic shock [18
the primary cause of death from radiation sickess is hematopoietic and gastrointestinal syndromes
associated with sepsis [ ]. Here, we investigated the protective effect of 2-ADT and 2-AADT on
–20]. It is known that
2
hematopoietic and intestinal damage in irradiated mice. In this study, the 30-day survival rate of mice,
effects of 2-ADT and 2-AADT on hematopoietic system, antioxidant defense system, DNA damage,
NO content, the crypt-villus structure of the small intestine and proliferation and differentiation of
intestinal cells in irradiated mice were respectively assessed.
2. Results
2.1. 2-ADT and 2-AADT Improved the Survival of Mice Exposed to a Lethal Dose of Irradiation
As shown in Figure 1, Only 33.3% (8/24) of the vehicle-treated group survived for 30 days
following 7.5 Gy whole body irradiation. the survival rates of 2-ADT (10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg) and
2-AADT (10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg) groups increased by 29.2%, 54.2%, 16.7% and 8.3%, respectively,
compared to the vehicle-treated group. Moreover, the survival rate of 2-ADT 20 mg/kg group was
significantly higher than that of vehicle group (p < 0.001).

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
3 of 15
Figure 1. Survival curve of mice exposed to 7.5 Gy WBI. Mice (n = 24 each) were injected i.p. with
2-ADT or 2-AADT 30 min before being exposed to 7.5 Gy WBI. Comparison of survival curves by
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. the difference in survival between
the vehicle+IR and 2-ADT 20 mg/kg group was statistically significant (p < 0.001).
2.2. 2-ADT and 2-AADT Promoted Recovery of Hematopoietic System
As shown in Figure 2A,B, compared with control group, the numbers of white blood cell (WBC)
and platelet (PLT) in irradiated vehicle group were significantly reduced (p < 0.01). the 2-ADT
treatment group showed markedly higher WBC count than vehicle group (p < 0.05). the treatment
groups receiving 2-ADT and 2-AADT exhibited obvious increase in PLT level compared with vehicle
group (p < 0.05).
The spleen is an important representative of the hematopoietic organs of mice [15], and the number
of endogenous CFU-S is considered to be an index of hematopoietic function [21]. Figure 2C shows that
the number of CFU-S in 2-ADT treated group was significantly higher than in vehicle group (p < 0.01).
The bone marrow DNA content and the number of BMNC were determined to evaluate
the damage and repair of bone marrow cells (Figure 2D,E). Ionizing radiation significantly reduced
the bone marrow DNA content in vehicle group compared to the control group (p < 0.01), and the DNA
content of mice treated with 2-ADT and 2-AADT was significantly higher than that of vehicle group
mice (p < 0.05). the statistically significant decrease in BMNC counts was observed from the control
group to the irradiation vehicle group (p < 0.01). Administration of 2-ADT prior to irradiation
effectively elevated the BMNC counts (p < 0.05).

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
4 of 15
Figure 2. Effects of 2-ADT and 2-AADT on hematopoietic system. (A) WBC counts; (B) PLT counts;
(
C
) CFU-S counts; (
treatment. 2-ADT and 2-AADT were administered i.p. 30 min before 6.0 Gy irradiation. Results are
expressed as the mean SD (n = 8 each). One-way ANOVA was used for statistical comparisons
D) DNA content and (E) BMNC counts of irradiated and control mice 7 days after
±
between groups. the p value indicates the difference compared with the IR + vehicle group.
2.3. 2-ADT and 2-AADT Enhanced the Activity of Various Antioxidant Enzymes and Reduced
Lipid Peroxidation
Endogenous antioxidant defense systems include enzymatic antioxidants such as superoxide
dismutase (SOD) , catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and nonenzymatic antioxidants
such as reduced glutathione (GSH), which can scavenge and reduce a wide range of oxidants [22].
Figure 3A,E show SOD activity in liver and lung. Figure 3B,F show CAT activity in liver and lung.
the activity of SOD and CAT in liver and lung lowered in irradiation vehicle group compared with

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
5 of 15
control group, treatment with 2-ADT and 2-AADT can reverse the reduction of SOD and CAT activity
to varying degrees. In particular, the 2-ADT and 2-AADT pretreatment groups significantly increased
CAT activity in the liver compared to the irradiated vehicle group (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effects of pretreatment with 2-ADT and 2-AADT on alterations of antioxidant enzymes
activities in tissues after irradiation. 2-ADT and 2-AADT were administered i.p. 30 min before
irradiation. (
) T-SOD; (
presented as the mean
A
F
) T-SOD; (
) CAT; ( ) GSH and (
SD (n= 8 each). One-way ANOVA was used for statistical comparisons
B
) CAT; (
C
) GSH and (
D) MDA from liver 7 days after 6.0 Gy irradiation;
(
E
G
H) MDA from lung 7 days after 6.0 Gy irradiation. The data are
±
between groups. The p value shows the difference compared with the IR + vehicle group.
2.4. 2-ADT and 2-AADT Attenuated Radiation-Induced Elevation of NO in Plasma
Figure 4A,B show the NOx content in plasma, as an index of nitrosative stress [23]. The NO levels
(NOx) in plasma were significantly higher in mice subjected to 7.5 Gy WBI at 6 h (p < 0.01) and 7 days
(p < 0.05) than in control mice, but the content at 7 days is much lower than that at 6 h. It is speculated
that the content may increase first and then decrease, which is basically consistent with the literature
reports [4]. Pretreatment with 2-ADT and 2-AADT significantly (p < 0.01) decreased radiation-induced
NO production 6 h after irradiation. In contrast, although the 2-ADT and 2-ADDT groups were able to
reduce radiation-induced increases in NO levels 7 d after irradiation, they were not significant.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
6 of 15
Figure 4. The content of nitrite and nitrate (NOx) in plasma of irradiated and control mice at 6 h and
7 days after 7.5 Gy irradiation. 2-ADT and 2-AADT were administered i.p. 30 min before irradiation.
(
A
,B
) Plasma NOx content at 6 h and 7 days after irradiation, respectively. the data are presented as
the mean SD (n = 12 each). One-way ANOVA was used for statistical comparisons between groups.
±
The p value indicates the difference compared with the IR + vehicle group.
Figure 3C,G show GSH levels in liver and lung. The GSH levels in liver and lung were significantly
reduced in mice subjected to 6.0 Gy WBI compared with control mice (p < 0.01). Treatment with 2-ADT
and 2-AADT resulted in evident increase in GSH content in the liver compared to vehicle group
(p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 respectively). A marked increase of GSH content in the lung was observed only
in the 2-AADT treatment group compared to the vehicle group (p < 0.01)
Figure 3D,H show malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in liver and lung, as an indicator of lipid
peroxidation and oxidative stress [24]. Compared with the control group, the levels of MDA in the liver
and lung were significantly elevated in the irradiation vehicle group (p < 0.05). Both 2-ADT and
2-AADT sharply decreased liver MDA levels in both treatment groups (p < 0.01). However, treatment
with 2-ADT and 2-AADT resulted in no significant decrease in lung MDA levels compared to vehicle
group (p > 0.05).
2.5. 2-ADT and 2-AADT Alleviated Radiation-Induced DNA Damage to Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
The comet assay was used to detect radiation-induced DNA damage, particularly DNA strand
breaks, and the percentage of DNA in tail (Tail DNA %) and tail moment (TM) were used as parameters
to measure DNA damage [25]. As presented in Figure 5, compared with control group, the Tail DNA%
and TM of irradiated vehicle group increased significantly (p < 0.01). Treatment with 2-ADT and
2-AADT resulted in a significant reduction in Tail DNA% and TM (p < 0.01) compared to the vehicle
group. These data indicated that 2-ADT and 2-AADT effectively attenuated radiation-induced DNA
damage in lymphocytes.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
7 of 15
Figure 5. The effects of 2-ADT and 2-AADT on DNA damage in mice after 6.0 Gy radiation. 2-ADT and
2-AADT were administered i.p. 30 min before irradiation. ( ) Representative images of lymphocytes
from different groups. Scale bar, 50 m; ( ) Tail DNA% and ( ) Tail Moment (TM) reflecting DNA
A
µ
B
C
damage indirectly by the column graph. the data are presented as the mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA
was used for statistical comparisons between groups. The p value shows the difference compared with
the IR + vehicle group.
2.6. 2-ADT and 2-AADT Ameliorated Small Intestinal Injury in Mice after Abdominal Irradiation
As shown in Figure 6, the architecture of crypt-villus was intact and normal in control group.
At 3 days after 13 Gy abdominal irradiation, atrophic and distorted villi , crypt abscesses and loss
were observed in the irradiated vehicle group. 2-ADT and 2-AADT treated mice showed increased
villi length, more surviving crypts and less crypt abscess than vehicle mice. Thus, pretreatment with
2-ADT and 2-AADT prior to irradiation ameliorated radiation-induced small intestinal injury.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
8 of 15
Figure 6. Effects of 2-ADT and 2-AADT on intestinal injury in mice after 13 Gy abdominal irradiation.
2-ADT and 2-AADT were administered i.p. 30 min before irradiation.the small intestine of mice was
harvested 3 days after abdominal irradiation for pathological and immunohistochemical examination.
Representative HE staining and imunohistochemical images of villin, lysozyme and Ki67 of the small
intestine in different treatment groups. Scale bar, 100 µm.
2.7. 2-ADT and 2-AADT Promoted the Proliferation of Vill+ Enterocytes, Paneth Cells and Ki67+ Transient
Amplifying Cells in the Small Intestine of Mice after Abdominal Irradiation
Immunohistochemical localization of villin, lysozyme and Ki67 antibodies were used to assess
the expression of vill+ enterocytes, Paneth cells and Ki67+ transient amplifying cells in the small
intestine, respectively [26]. As shown in Figure 6, at 3 days after 13 Gy abdominal irradiation,
the numbers of Paneth cells, vill+ and Ki67+ positive cells in vehicle group were significantly lower
than that in control group. Pretreatment with 2-ADT or 2-AADT increased the immunostaining of
villin, lysozyme and Ki67 compared to the vehicle group. Therefore, 2-ADT and 2-AADT promoted
the proliferation and restoration of intestinal injured cells in irradiated mice.
2.8. 2-ADT and 2-AADT Attenuated Radiation-Induced Nitrotyrosine Expression in the Small Intestine after
Abdominal Irradiation
Immunohistochemical result of nitrotyrosine was shown in Figure 7, the nitrotyrosine staining
in irradiated vehicle group was more intense compared to the weak staining in control group. Mild
nitrotyrosine staining was shown in the 2-ADT or 2-AADT treatment group. These results indicate
that 2-ADT and 2-AADT can attenuate nitrotyrosine expression in the small intestines.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
9 of 15
Figure 7. Representative immunohistochemical images of nitrotyrosine in different groups of small
intestine on day 3 after exposure to 13 Gy of abdominal irradiation. 2-ADT and 2-AADT were
administered i.p. 30 min before irradiation. the yellow arrow indicates nitrotyrosine staining. Scale bar,
100 µm.
3. Discussion
It is well established that radiotherapy can cause severe toxicity to the organism, mainly due
to the interaction of reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen species with biomolecules such as DNA,
lipids and proteins [
hematopoietic dysfunction, and gastrointestinal damage has become an important factor restricting
radiotherapy [ ]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop effective drugs to protect normal tissues
5]. Furthermore, radiation sickness with basic lesions such as myelosuppression,
2
from radiation damage and improve the prognosis during radiotherapy. A considerable amount of
literatures have shown that ionizing radiation can cause a large increase in NO levels, and its excessive
production can lead to cytotoxic actions and mediate inflammation [27], and NO is also a mediator of
radiation-induced tissue damage and a negative regulator of hematopoietic stem cell activity [
Evidence suggests that NOS inhibitors can act as radioprotectors by attenuating radiation-induced
elevation of NO or inducing hypoxia [ 12 14]. 2-ADT and 2-AADT are potent inhibitors of nitric oxide
7,13].
2,
,
synthase and early study indicated that the radioprotective activity of 2-ADT was not attributable
to the oxygen effect [28]. It is known that 2-AADT is a prodrug of 2-ADT, and 2-AADT has higher
NOS inhibitory activity and longer duration of antihypertensive action than 2-ADT [19,20]. However,
our study did not find that 2-AADT is significantly more protective than 2-ADT. Because the time
of administration is the same, it is likely that the best time for 2-AADT administration is missed.
In the endotoxin shock model, the study time is quite short (up to 2 h), but the damage response
after radiation is a long-lasting process. Therefore, short-term NOS inhibitory activity does not fully
represent its radiation protection. However, inhibitors with strong NOS-inhibiting activity may be
candidates for screening radioprotector. the aim of the this study was to evaluate the protective effects
of 2-ADT and its derivative 2-AADT on radiation and to explore the underlying mechanism.
In the present study, it was found that both 2-ADT and 2-AADT can prolong the survival of mice
exposed to lethal doses, suggesting that they have overall protective effects on the irradiated mice.
It is well known that the hematopoietic system is extremely sensitive to IR. Our findings indicated
that administration of 2-ADT and 2-AADT increased the amount of endogenous CFU-S, BMNCs,
WBC and PLT as well as DNA content, indicating that they promoted the restore and regeneration of

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
10 of 15
the hematopoietic system. In addition, they enhanced the antioxidant defense system of the liver and
lungs by potentiating antioxidant enzyme activity, increasing GSH levels and attenuating oxidative
stress (Figure 3). Previous studies demonstrated that ROS are the initial reactants generated from
irradiation, and RNS is the actual effector of redox-dependent cell signaling pathways [8]. Oxidative
stress is closely related to nitrosative stress and RNS. Thus, NOS inhibitors may directly attenuate
nitrosative stress by reducing RNS content and indirectly weaken oxidative stress and enhance
antioxidant defenses.
It is reported that cytotoxicity, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity in cells exposed to ionizing
radiation are thought to be mainly due to damage to DNA [29]. Comet assay results indicated that
administration of 2-ADT or 2-AADT can protect DNA from radiation-induced damage. According to
previous studies, NO inhibits enzymes involved in mitochondrial respiration, leading to the depletion
of intracellular ATP and ultimately to death, and damages DNA directly and indirectly [7,30]. In this
study, we found that both of 2-ADT and 2-AADT can reduce the increase of NOx content caused by
ionizing radiation in plasma , thereby attenuating NO-mediated cytotoxicity.
In histopathological evaluation of the small intestine based on HE staining, severe damage to
crypts and villis was clearly observed, and the histopathological changes considerably reduced in
both treatment groups Figure 6. the ONOO− produced by the rapid reaction of NO and superoxide
generated by radiation can lead to membrane lipid peroxidation and nitration and hydroxylation of
phenolic compounds (such as tyrosine residues in proteins) [
ONOO as a nitrating agent, is a marker for the presence of peroxynitrite and oxidative damage [7,32]
7
,
31]. Nitrotyrosine, a stable byproduct of
−
.
We detected a significant increase in nitrotyrosine immunostaining in the small intestine on the third
day after abdominal irradiation, and we observed that the expression of lysozyme (marker of Paneth
cells), villin and Ki67 in 2-ADT and 2-AADT treated group was significant higher than that of
+
the irradiated vehicle group (Figures 6 and 7). It can be deduced that the increase of Paneth cells, vill
enterocytes and Ki67 cells when 2-ADT and 2-AADT were administered to irradiated mice may be
related to suppression of peroxynitrite formation. Study have shown that NO may, via peroxynitrite,
alter the proliferative signaling mediated by protein tyrosine kinases, resulting in decreased enterocyte
proliferation and differentiation , which together with NO-induced apoptosis leads to intestinal barrier
failure [33,
34]. Thus, 2-ADT and 2-AADT promote the proliferation of Paneth cells, vill+ enterocytes
and Ki67+ cells in the small intestine by attenuating peroxynitrite-mediated nitrosative stress.
In short, the results of this study demonstrated that 2-ADT and 2-AADT as NOS inhibitors have
protective effects on radiation-induced hematopoietic and intestinal injury. Our data indicated that
the effects were achieved through accelerating hematopoietic regeneration, decreasing oxidative and
nitrosative stress by enhancing the antioxidant defense system and reducing NO as well as ONOO−
content, and mitigating the radiation-induced DNA damage. These findings further suggest that
2-ADT or 2-AADT may be effective agents to ameliorate the damages in radiotherapy.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Chemicals
Target compounds 2-ADT and 2-AADT were synthesized as shown in Figure 8. As previously
reported in the literature [20], to 1.52 g (20 mmol) of thiourea in 10 mL of isopropanol was added
◦
3-bromopropylamine hydrobromide (5.25 g, 24 mmol), the mixture was refluxed for 1.5 h at 82 C then
cooled. the precipitate was filtered and washed with warm isopropanol, and removal of the solvent
under reduced pressure produced a white solid. Yield 4.60 g (78%) of S-(aminopropyl)isothiourea
dihydrobromide. the obtained compound (4.28 g, 20 mmol) was dissolved in 60 mL of water and
was refluxed for 21 h at 100 ◦C. Then the water was evaporated using rotary evaporator and the rest
was twice treated with a hot mixture of isopropanol-ethylacetate (100 mL each). the solutions were
combined, evaporated using rotary evaporator till the volume 60 mL and cooled. the precipitate was

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
11 of 15
filtered and washed with ether. Removal of the solvent under reduced pressure yielded an white
crystal. Yield 0.85 g (22%) of 2-ADT.
The mixture of acetic anhydride (5 mL) and 2-ADT (0.56 g, 2.8 mmol) was heated at 90 ◦C under
magnetic stirring for 10.5 h and then cooled. the precipitate was filtered off and washed with ether,
yielding a pale-yellow powder of 2-ADDT (0.4 g, 60%).
◦
◦
Figure 8. Reagents and conditions: (a) (CH3)2CHOH, 82 C, 1.5 h; (b) H2O, 100 C, 21 h; (c) (CH3CO)2O,
90 C, 10.5 h.
◦
4.2. Mice and Irradiation
Male ICR mice (Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China)
weighing 20–22 g and male C57BL/6 mice (Beijing HFK Bioscience Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) weighing
20–22 g were used for these experiments. All mice were housed in a climate-controlled, specific
pathogen free environment with a 12 h light/dark cycle, and they received diet and water ad libitum.
Experimental procedures on mice were approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of
the Institute of Radiation Medicine (approval number: 170619, 14 March 2017). Whole-body irradiation
(WBI) and abdominal irradiation was performed using a 137Cs gamma-ray source (Gammacell-40,
Atomic Energy of Canadian Inc., Chalk River, ON, Canada) at a dose-rate of 0.99 Gy/min. Control
group was treated similarly to the irradiated groups but without exposure to ionizing radiation.
4.3. Survival Study
ICR mice were randomly divided into six groups (n = 24 each): control, vehicle + IR, 10 mg/kg
2-ADT + IR, 20 mg/kg 2-ADT + IR, 10 mg/kg 2-AADT + IR, 20 mg/kg 2-ADDT + IR. 2-ADT
and 2-AADT were dissolved in normal saline for administration at the desired concentrations for
intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection into the mice. For the 2-ADT and 2-AADT treatment , mice received an
intraperitoneal injection of 0.2 mL solution once 30 min prior to 7.5 Gy WBI. the control and vehicle
groups were treated with vehicle similarly to the procedure described above. Survival was observed
daily up to 30 days post irradiation.
4.4. Determination of the Effect of 2-ADT and 2-AADT on Radiation Induced Hematopoietic System Injury
ICR mice were randomly divided into four groups (n = 8 each): control, vehicle + IR, 20 mg/kg
2-ADT + IR, 10 mg/kg 2-AADT + IR. Mice were treated as described above and exposed to 6.0 Gy
irradiation. Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation 7 days post-irradiation. Blood, spleen, and
bilateral femurs were collected to evaluate the effect of 2-ADT and 2-AADT on the hematopoietic
system [15]. Blood was collected before cervical dislocation.
4.4.1. Hematological Parameters
Blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital venous plexus into K2EDTA collection
tubes for hematology analysis, and animals were anesthetized prior to retro orbital blood collections.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
12 of 15
The number of different types of blood cells in the peripheral blood was counted by a MEK-7222K
hemocytometer (Nihon Kohden Corp, Tokyo, Japan).
4.4.2. Colony Forming Assay
The spleens were removed and fixed in Bouins solution for 24 h. Macroscopic spleen
colony-forming unit (CFU-S) on the splenic surfaces were scored [35].
4.4.3. Bone Marrow Nucleated Cells and DNA Content
The bilateral femurs of the mice were excised and all muscle tissue was removed.
For determination of bone marrow DNA content, the bone marrow was flushed into 10 mL 0.005 M
◦
calcium chloride solution. After placing the cell suspension 30 min at 4 C, centrifugation and
discarding the supernatant, the sediment is resuspended in 5 mL of a 0.2 M perchloric acid. Suspension
◦
was incubated for 30 min at 90 C, filtered after cooling, and the absorbance was measured using
an ultraviolet spectrophotometer at 268 nm [36]. For determination of bone marrow nucleated cells
(BMNC), the bone marrow was flushed into 1ml PBS followed by filtered through nylon meshes for
cytometric analysis [36].
4.5. Biochemical Determination
The livers and lungs were collected for biochemical determinations including MDA, SOD,
GSH and CAT analysis using Malondialdehyde assay kit, Total Superoxide Dismutase assay kit,
Reduced glutathione assay kit and Catalase assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute,
Nanjing, China).
4.6. Plasma NOx Detection
ICR mice were randomly divided into four groups (n = 12 each): control, vehicle + IR, 20 mg/kg
2-ADT + IR, 10 mg/kg 2-AADT + IR. Mice were treated as described above in survival study. Blood
samples were collected at 6 h and 7 days after 7.5 Gy WBI. Six mice were taken from each group at
each time point. the concentration of plasma nitrite and nitrate (NOx) was measured using Nitric
Oxide (NO) assay kit (Nitrate reductase method) (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute). Nitrite
and nitrate (NOx) as stable metabolites of NO were used to quantify NO production [37].
4.7. Comet Assay
Whole blood was obtained from mice 1h after 6.0 Gy WBI. Peripheral blood lymphocytes
were separated from the whole blood by using mouse peripheral lymphocyte separation medium
(TBDsciences).the basic procedure is performed as described by Yang W. et al. [38]. 100 randomly
selected cells each sample are analyzed and tail moment (TM) and percentage of DNA in tail (TDNA%)
were selected for the quantification of DNA damage.
4.8. Determination of the Effects of 2-ADT and 2-AADT on Intestinal Injury in Irradiated Mice
C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into four groups (n = 6 each): control, vehicle + IR,
20 mg/kg 2-ADT + IR, 10 mg/kg 2-AADT + IR. Mice were treated as described above, and anesthesia
with an intraperitoneal injection of 3.5% chloral hydrate (0.1 mL/10g body weight) before 13 Gy
abdominal radiation. the small intestine was collected at 3 days post irradiation and fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde for 24 h before paraffin embedding, and cut into 5 µm-thick sections.
4.8.1. Histopathology
The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and examined under a light
microscope. Villus injury, crypt damage and mononuclear cell infiltration in the lamina propria
were used to assess small intestine injury [39].

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
13 of 15
4.8.2. Immunohistochemistry
The paraffin sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated using xylene and ethanol, and immersed
in 3% hydrogen peroxide solution for 30 min to block endogenous peroxidase. the sections were
immersed in Tris-EDTA Buffer (pH 9.0) by microwave heating for antigen retrieval. Sections were
blocked with goat serum for 30 min and then incubated with anti-nitrotyrosine (1:200, ab42789) ,
anti-Ki67 (1:300◦, NB110-89717F), anti-lysozyme (1:800, ab108508), and anti-Villin (1:800, ab130751)
antibodies at 4 C overnight in a humidified chamber. PBS-washed sections were then incubated
with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit detection system (PV-6001, ZSGB-BIO,
Beijing, China) for 1h at room temperature. After washing, the slides were visualized with DAB and
counterstained with hematoxylin. For each mouse, four cross-sections of the intestine were cut and four
views were captured randomly in each cross-section using a microscope. the images were quantified
by measuring the density and number of DAB-stained cells with Image Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media
Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA) [40].
4.9. Statistical Analysis
The results were presented as mean
±
SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way
ANOVA using SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was taken as p < 0.05
or p < 0.01. the significance of survival curves was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and
the log-rank test.
Author Contributions: W.X. and Y.L. conceived and designed the experiments; Y.L., S.K. performed the experiments,
analyzed the data, interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript; F.Y. helped with data analysis and
manuscript preparation; Y.L. and W.X. helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions.
Acknowledgments: We thank Olga N. Zefirova for his guidance in the experimental synthesis section. This study
was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 81273005) and CAMS Innovation
Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS, 2017-I2M-3-019).
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Pratheeshkumar, P.; Raphael, T.J.; Kuttan, G. Protective role of perillic acid against radiation-induced
oxidative stress, cytokine profile, DNA damage, and intestinal toxicity in mice. J. Environ. Pathol.
Toxicol. Oncol. 2010, 29, 199–212. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Babicova, A.; Havlinova, Z.; Hroch, M.; Rezacova, M.; Pejchal, J.; Vavrova, J.; Chladek, J. In vivo study
of radioprotective effect of NO-synthase inhibitors and acetyl-L-carnitine. Physiol. Res. 2013, 62, 701–710.
[PubMed]
3.
4.
Voevodskaya, N.V.; Vanin, A.F. Gamma-irradiation potentiates L-arginine-dependent nitric oxide formation
in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992, 186, 1423–1428. [CrossRef]
Babicova, A.; Havlinova, Z.; Pejchal, J.; Tichy, A.; Rezacova, M.; Vavrova, J.; Chladek, J. Early changes in
L-arginine-nitric oxide metabolic pathways in response to the whole-body gamma irradiation of rats. Int. J.
Radiat. Biol. 2011, 87, 1067–1073. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.
6.
7.
Guzik, T.J.; Korbut, R.; Adamekguzik, T. Nitric oxide and superoxide in inflammation and immune regulation.
J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2003, 54, 469–487. [PubMed]
Ricciardolo, F.; Sterk, P.J.; Gaston, B.; Folkerts, G. Nitric Oxide in Health and Disease of the Respiratory
System. Physiol. Rev. 2004, 84, 731–765. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Giaid, A.; Lehnert, S.M.; Chehayeb, B.; Chehayeb, D.; Kaplan, I.; Shenouda, G. Inducible Nitric Oxide
Synthase and Nitrotyrosine in Mice With Radiation-Induced Lung Damage. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 26,
e67–e72. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8.
Mikkelsen, R.B.; Wardman, P. Biological chemistry of reactive oxygen and nitrogenand radiation-induced
signal transduction mechanisms. Oncogene 2003, 22, 5734–5754. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
14 of 15
9.
Brach, M.A.; Hass, R.; Sherman, M.L.; Gunji, H.; Weichselbaum, R.; Kufe, D. Ionizing Radiation Induces
Expression and Binding Activity of the Nuclear Factor KB. J. Clin. Investig. 1991, 88, 691–695. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
10. Zhou, D.; Brown, S.A.; Yu, T.; Chen, G.; Barve, S.; Kang, B.C.; Thompson, J.S. A high dose of ionizing
radiation induces tissue-specific activation of nuclear factor-kappaB in vivo. Radiat. Res. 1999, 151, 703–709.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Xie, Q.W.; Kashiwabara, Y.; Nathan, C. Role of transcription factor NF-kappa B/Rel in induction of nitric
oxide synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 4705–4708. [PubMed]
12. Liebmann, J.; DeLuca, A.M.; Coffin, D.; Keefer, L.K.; Venzon, D.; Wink, D.A.; Mitchell, J.B. In vivo radiation
protection by nitric oxide modulation. Cancer Res. 1994, 54, 3365–3368. [PubMed]
13. Michurina, T.; Krasnov, P.; Balazs, A.; Nakaya, N.; Vasilieva, T.; Kuzin, B.; Khrushchov, N.; Mulligan, R.C.;
Enikolopov, G. Nitric oxide is a regulator of hematopoietic stem cell activity. Mol. Ther. 2004, 10, 241–248.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Filimonova, M.V.; Shevchenko, L.I.; Trofimova, T.P.; Makarchuk, V.M.; Shevchuk, A.S.; Lushnikova, G.A. On
the mechanism of radioprotective effect of NO-synthase inhibitors. Radiat. Biol. Radioecol. 2014, 54, 500–506.
15. Meer, C.V.D.; Bekkum, D.W.V. The Mechanism of Radiation Protection by Histamine and Other Biological
Amines, International Journal of Radiation Biology, Informa Healthcare. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1959, 1, 5–23.
[CrossRef]
16. Prewitt, R.L.; Musacchia, X.J. Mechanisms of radio-protection by catecholamines in the hamster (Mesocricetus
auratus). Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem. Med. 1975, 27, 181–191. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Allalunis-Turner, M.J.; Walden, T.L.; Sawich, C. Induction of marrow hypoxia by radioprotective agents.
Radiat. Res. 1989, 118, 581–586. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Proskuryakov, S.Y.; Filimonova, M.V.; Verkhovskii, Y.G.; Konoplyannikov, A.G.; Mandrugin, A.A.;
Fedoseev, V.M.; Skvortsov, V.G. Effect of NO synthase inhibitor 2-amino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazine on
endotoxin-induced changes in hemodynamic parameters and respiration in rats. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2004,
138, 397–400. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. Filimonova, M.V.; Trofimova, T.P.; Borisova, G.S.; Mandrugin, A.A. Antihypotensive activity of
2-acetylamino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazine for an endotoxic shock model in rats. Pharm. Chem. J. 2012, 46,
210–212. [CrossRef]
20. Trofimova, T.P.; Zefirova, O.N.; Mandrugin, A.A.; Fedoseev, V.M.; Peregud, D.I.; Onufriev, M.V.; Gulyaeva, N.V.;
Proskuryakov, S.Y. Synthesis and study of NOS-inhibiting activity of 2-N-acylamino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazine.
Mosc. Univ. Chem. Bull. 2008, 10, 274–277. [CrossRef]
21. Park, E.; Ahn, G.N.; Lee, N.H.; Kim, J.M.; Yun, J.S.; Hyun, J.W.; Jeon, Y.J.; Wie, M.B.; Lee, Y.J.; Park, J.W.;
et al. Radioprotective properties of eckol against ionizing radiation in mice. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582, 925–930.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Oyewole, A.O.; Birch-Machin, M.A. Mitochondrial-targeted antioxidants. FASEB J. 2015, 29, 4766–4771.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Arjmand, A.Y.; Mohammadi, M.T.; Sarami, F.M.; Raouf, S.J. Captopril and Valsartan May Improve
Cognitive Function Through Potentiation of the Brain Antioxidant Defense System and Attenuation of
Oxidative/Nitrosative Damage in STZ-Induced Dementia in Rat. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2016, 6, 531–539.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Khare, T.; Desai, D.; Kumar, V. Effect of MgCl2 stress on germination, plant growth, chlorophyll content,
proline content and lipid peroxidation in sorghum cultivars. J. Stress Phys. Biochem. 2012, 8, 169–178.
25. Sowmithra, K.; Shetty, N.J.; Jha, S.K.; Chaubey, R.C. Evaluation of genotoxicity of the acute gamma radiation
on earthworm Eisenia fetida using single cell gel electrophoresis technique (Comet Assay). Genet. Toxicol.
Environ. 2015, 794, 52–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Guo, M.Z.; Gong, W.; Zhang, H.W.; Wang, Y.; Du, L.Q.; Xu, C.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, H.; Liu, Q.; Fan, F.Y. Human
mesenchymal stem cells promote survival and prevent intestinal damage in a mouse model of radiation
injury. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 65105–65111. [CrossRef]
27. Whittle, B.J. Nitric oxide in physiology and pathology. Mol. Asp. Med. 1995, 27, 727–737. [CrossRef]
28. Mandrugin, A.A.; Konstantinova, M.M.; Nekrasova, I.V.; Tarasenko, A.G. Study of the mechanism of
the radioprotective activity of 2-amino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazine, 4-methyl- and 2-amino-2-thiazoline
hydrobromides. Radiobiologiia 1977, 17, 590–592. [PubMed]

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1530
15 of 15
29. Téoule, R. Radiation-induced DNA Damage and Its Repair. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem. Med.
1987, 51, 573–589. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Wong, J.M.; Billiar, T.R. Regulation and function of inducible nitric oxide synthase during sepsis and acute
inflammation. Adv. Pharmacol. 1995, 34, 155–170. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Radi, R.; Beckman, J.S.; Bush, K.M.; Freeman, B.A. Peroxynitrite-induced membrane lipid peroxidation:
the cytotoxic potential of superoxide and nitric oxide. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1991, 288, 481–487. [CrossRef]
32. Crow, J.P.; Beckman, J.S. Reactions between Nitric Oxide, Superoxide, and Peroxynitrite: Footprints of
Peroxynitrite in Vivo. Adv. Pharmacol. 1995, 34, 17–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Chokshi, N.K.; Guner, Y.S.; Hunter, C.J.; Upperman, J.S.; Grishin, A.; Ford, H.R. the role of nitric oxide in
intestinal epithelial injury and restitution in neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin. Perinatol. 2008, 32,
92–99. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Leitão, R.F.; Brito, G.A.; Oriá, R.B.; Braga-Neto, M.B.; Bellaguarda, E.A.; Silva, J.V.; Gomes, A.S.;
Lima-Júnior, R.C.; Siqueira, F.J.; Freire, R.S.; et al. Role of inducible nitric oxide synthase pathway on
methotrexate-induced intestinal mucositis in rodents. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011, 11, 90. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Xu, W.; Yang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, X. Protective effects of rosmarinic acid against radiation-induced damage
to the hematopoietic system in mice. J. Radiat. Res. 2016, 57, 356–362. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Zhang, X.D.; Jing, Y.; Song, S.; Yang, J.; Wang, J.Y.; Xue, X.; Min, Y.; Park, G.; Shen, X.; Sun,Y.M.; et al. Catalytic
topological insulator Bi2Se3 nanoparticles for in vivo protection against ionizing radiation. Nanomedicine
2017, 13, 1597–1605. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Tsikas, D.; Gutzki, F.M.; Stichtenoth, D.O. Circulating and excretory nitrite and nitrate as indicators of nitric
oxide synthesis in humans: Methods of analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2006, 62, 51–59. [CrossRef]
38. Yang, W.; Sun, Z.; Yang, B.; Wang, Q. Nrf2-Knockout Protects from Intestinal Injuries in C57BL/6J Mice
Following Abdominal Irradiation with gamma Rays. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1656. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Acipayam, C.; Bayram, I.; Daglioglu, K.; Doran, F.; Yilmaz, S.; Sezgin, G.; Totan Ates¸, B.; Ozkan, A.;
Tanyeli, A. the protective effect of hesperidin on methotrexate-induced intestinal epithelial damage in rats:
An experimental study. Med. Princ. Pract. 2014, 23, 45–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40. Huang, E.Y.; Wang, F.S.; Lin, I.H.; Yang, K.D. Aminoguanidine alleviates radiation-induced small-bowel
damage through its antioxidant effect. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2009, 74, 237–244. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
c
ꢀ 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).