D. Barrett et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 1843–1849
1849
Table 4. In vivo antifungal activity: efficacy in disseminated murine
candidiasis
blocking of this OH group in the echinocandins
removes enzyme activity. An alternative explanation for
the potent activity of tyrosine-modified analogues might
be that FR901469 can also express antifungal activity
by another mechanism not involving glucan synthesis,
for example, membrane destabilization. With regards
this possibility, researchers at Nippon Roche have
reported that the tyrosine O-methyl derivative of 1 pos-
sessed good glucan synthase inhibitory activity.7 Fur-
ther studies on the glucan synthase inhibitory potency
and membrane effects of these derivatives should help to
clarify this point in more detail.
Compound
ED50 (mg/kg)
0.44–0.88a
FR901469
3
14
18
19
20
Amphotericin B
Fluconazole
b
0.45(0.5)
0.72 (1.5)
0.97 (2)
0.8 (1.6)
1.02 (2.1)
0.132
>20
aRange for FR901469 over a number of experiments.
bRatio of ED50(drug)/ED50(FR901469) for the same experiment.
References and Notes
led to a significant reduction in glucan synthase inhibi-
tion and MFC.14 Amino derivative 4 had slightly
weaker in vitro antifungal activity. However, these
modifications had no effect at all on hemolysis at 1 mg/
mL, indicating the need for further modification.
Increasing polarity by introduction of a b-alanine resi-
due (9) reduced hemolysis significantly (49% vs 100% at
1 mg/mL). Interestingly, compound 7 with the ornithine
group blocked as acetamide and a b-alanyl residue on
the tyrosine, had even lower hemolysis (23%), although
not as low as acetamide 5.10
1. Fujie, A.; Iwamoto, T.; Muramatsu, H.; Okudaira, T.;
Nitta, K.; Nakanishi, T.; Sakamoto, K.; Hori, Y.; Hino, M.;
Hashimoto, S.; Okuhara, M. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 912.
2. Fujie, A.; Iwamoto, T.; Muramatsu, H.; Okudaira, T.;
Sato, I.; Furuta, T.; Tsurumi, Y.; Hori, Y.; Hino, M.; Hashi-
moto, S. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 920.
3. Georgopapadakou, N. H. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 2001,
10, 269.
4. Ohyama, T.; Kurihara, Y.; Ono, Y.; Ishikawa, T.; Miya-
koshi, S.; Hamano, K.; Arai, M.; Suzuki, T.; Igari, H.; Suzuki,
Y.; Inukai, M. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 1108.
5. Onishi, J.; Meinz, M.; Thompson, J.; Curotto, J.; Dreikorn,
S.; Rosenbach, M.; Douglas, C.; Abruzzo, G.; Flattery, A.;
Kong, L.; Cabello, A.; Vicente, F.; Pelaez, F.; Diez, M. T.;
Martin, I.; Bills, G.; Giacobbe, R.; Dombrowski, A.;
Schwartz, R.; Morris, S.; Harris, G.; Tsipouras, A.; Wilson,
K.; Kurtz, M. B. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 368.
6. Aoki, M.; Kohchi, M.; Masubuchi, K.; Mizuguchi, E.;
Murata, T.; Ohkuma, H.; Okada, T.; Sakaitani, M.; Shimma,
N.; Watanabe, T.; Yanagisawa, M.; Yasuda, Y. PCT Patent
Application, WO 0005251, Feb 3, 2000.
7. Masubuchi, K.; Okada, T.; Kohchi, M.; Sakaitani, M.;
Mizuguchi, E.; Shirai, H.; Aoki, M.; Watanabe, T.; Kondoh,
O.; Yamazaki, T.; Satoh, Y.; Kobayashi, K.; Inoue, T.; Horii,
I.; Shimma, N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 395.
8. Howard, L. C.; Gunnoe, M. D.; Debono, M.; Abbott, B. J.;
Turner, J. R. Toxicologist 1982, 2, 1984.
9. Debono, M.; Abbott, B. J.; Turner, J. R.; Howard, L. C.;
Gordee, R. S.; Hunt, A. S.; Barnhart, M.; Molloy, R. M.;
Willard, K. E.; Fukuda, D.; Butler, T. F.; Zeckner, D. J. Ann.
N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1988, 544, 152.
10. Barrett, D.; Tanaka, A.; Harada, K.; Ohki, H.; Watabe,
E.; Maki, K.; Ikeda, F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11,
479.
11. Barrett, D.; Tanaka, A.; Fujie, A.; Shigematsu, N.;
Hashimoto, M.; Hashimoto, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
703.
12. Tanaka, A.; Barrett, D.; Fujie, A.; Shigematsu, N.;
Hashimoto, M.; Hashimoto, S.; Ikeda, F. J. Antibiot. 2001, 54,
193.
13. Balkovec, J. M.; Black, R. M.; Abruzzo, G. K.; Bartizal,
K.; Dreikorn, S.; Nollstadt, K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993,
3, 2039.
14. Black, R. M.; Balkovec, J. M.; Nollstadt, K. M.; Drei-
korn, S.; Bartizal, K. F.; Abruzzo, G. K. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 1997, 7, 2879.
15. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Suscept-
ibility Testing of Yeasts; Approved Standard. NCCLS docu-
ment M27-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory
Standards: Wayne, PA, USA, 1997.
A number of other acylated derivatives, replacing the b-
alanine by various polar residues, were prepared and are
summarized in Table 3. It is clear from the data pre-
sented for these derivatives (15–20) that addition of
amino groups and/or carboxylic acid groups results in a
better hemolytic profile, but antifungal activity is also
reduced. Furthermore, the in vivo efficacies of com-
pounds 18, 19, and 20 were approximately half that of
FR901469, indicating no advantage over 1.
Introduction of substituents to the tyrosine phenol
group by alkylation was readily achieved. The car-
boxylic acid derivative 10 displayed strong in vitro
antifungal activity, but did not have a significant effect
on hemolysis (76% at 1 mg/mL). Amino derivative 12
had the lowest hemolytic activity amongst these simple
derivatives, however MIC was considered too weak to
warrant further consideration. The optimum result was
obtained with compound 14. Introduction of a carboxy-
methyl group to the phenol OH and a b-alanylamide to
the ortho-position resulted in a compound with the
lowest hemolysis (23%) and good in vivo activity in the
candidiasis model.
In summary, a series of tyrosine-modified analogues of
the unique macrocyclic lactone FR901469 has been
prepared. Several derivatives with good in vivo anti-
fungal efficacy and reduced hemolytic potential were
identified. Compound 14 in particular displayed good in
vivo efficacy in a candidiasis model and significantly
reduced hemolysis at 1 mg/mL. The results described
herein support the notion that the tyrosine phenol OH
in 1 and the homotyrosine phenol OH in the echino-
candins may not have the same role in the inhibition
mechanism of 1,3-b-glucan synthase, since removal or