interfaced to an XT/4-8086 computer. The reference com-
partment of the combination electrode was Ðlled with 0.10
3.40, t, J 8.4 Hz, SCH . 13C NMR (CDCl ) d: 171.55, C2N;
2
3
158.32, C1; 135.55, 132.84, C5, C3; 119.03, C6; 117.90, 110.19,
C2, C4; 63.36, CH N; 32.06, CH S.
mol dm~3 NaClO in 75% methanol and 25% water (v : v)
4
2
2
solvent and allowed to attain equilibrium over 2 days before
use. The pK s of 2 and 3È6 were determined from triplicate
2-(4,5-Dihydro-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)-5-nitrophenol, 5. A solution
of 2-hydroxy-4-nitrobenzonitrile (2.26 g, 0.013 mol), 2-
aminoethanethiol hydrochloride (1.90 g, 0.016 mol) and tri-
ethylamine (2.71 g, 0.026 mol) in ethanol (50 cm3) was
degassed and placed under a nitrogen atmosphere. The solu-
tion was reÑuxed for 50 min and cooled to room temperature,
forming crystals of 5, which were collected by vacuum Ðl-
tration and washed with ethanol (1.95 g, 63%). MP 150È
151 ¡C. (Found: C, 48.22; H, 3.37; N, 12.52; S, 14.45%.
C H N O S requires C, 48.21; H, 3.60; N, 12.49; S, 14.30%)
a
titrations of 10 cm3 of 1.00 ] 10~3 mol dm~3 ligand in 75%
methanol and 25% water by volume and 73.2% methanol,
24.4% water and 2.4% DMF by volume solutions, respec-
tively, thermostatted at 298.2 K in a titration vessel against
0.10 mol dm~3 NaOH in 75% methanol and 25% water by
volume solution delivered from a microburette. A Ðne stream
of nitrogen, which had been bubbled through successive traps
containing 0.10 mol dm~3 sodium hydroxide and 75% meth-
anol and 25% water by volume solvent, respectively, was
bubbled continuously through the magnetically stirred titra-
9
8 2 3
IR: 2724 (OH), 1614 (C2C), 1573 (C2C), 1340 cm~1 (CO). MS
tion solution to remove carbon dioxide. Ligand pK s were
m/z: 224 (M`). 1H NMR (CDCl ) d: 13.13, s, OH; 7.83, d, J
a
3
derived from the titration data using the programme
2.2 Hz, H6; 7.71, dd, J 2.2, 8.6 Hz, H4; 7.55, d, J 8.6 Hz, H3;
SUPERQUAD22 on a Digital Venturis 575 computer.
4.59, t, J 8.6 Hz, NCH ; 3.56, t, J 8.4 Hz, SCH . 13C NMR
2
2
UVÈvisible spectra were measured from 250 to 450 nm at 1
nm intervals at a scan rate of 1 nm s~1 and a spectral band-
width of 1.0 nm with a Varian Cary 2200 spectrophotometer
interfaced to an IBM-compatible 486DX personal computer.
Fluorescence spectra were measured from 350 to 600 nm at
0.5 nm intervals at a scan rate of 4 nm s~1 with a Perkin
Elmer LS50B Ñuorimeter interfaced to a Digital 75 MHz
Pentium computer. The entrance and exit slit widths were
adjusted in the range 0.4 to 0.6 nm for each ligand according
to the intensity of emitted light. Solutions were thermostatted
at 298.2 K in 1 ] 1 cm quartz cells for both sets of measure-
ments. Stability constants were determined by Ðtting algo-
rithms for 1 : 1, 1 : 1 and 1 : 2 and 1 : 1 and 2 : 1
complexations (Al3` : ligand) to the absorbance and Ñuores-
cence data using an inhouse programme, which also generated
the coordinated ligand spectra. The 1 : 1 algorithm yielded the
better data Ðts for each system.
(CDCl ) d: 171.86, C2N; 159.87, C1; 150.24, C4; 131.48, C3;
3
121.01, C2; 113.26, 112.52, C6, C4; 63.46, NCH ; 32.11,
2
SCH .
2
2-(4,5-Dihydro-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)-4-nitrophenol, 6. A solution
of 2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzonitrile (987 mg, 6.02 mmol), 2-
aminoethanethiol hydrochloride (845 mg, 7.44 mmol) and tri-
ethylamine (1.2 g, 11.77 mmol) in ethanol (25 cm3) was
degassed and placed under a nitrogen atmosphere. The solu-
tion was reÑuxed for 2 h after which a precipitate began to
form. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature
and yellow needle crystals of 6 were collected by vacuum Ðl-
tration and washed with ethanol (820 mg, 61%). MP 163È
166 ¡C. (Found: C, 48.06; H, 3.36; N, 12.52; S, 14.48%.
C H N O S requires C, 48.21; H, 3.60; N, 12.49; S, 14.30%)
9
8 2 3
IR: 3000 (OH), 1594 (C2C), 1334 cm~1 (CO). MS m/z: 224
(M`). 1H NMR (CDCl ) d: 13.80, s, OH; 8.33, d, J 2.8 Hz,
H3; 8.24, dd, J 3.0, 9.0 Hz, H5; 7.07, d, J 9.4 Hz, H6; 4.53, t, J
Uncorrected melting points were determined using a KoÑer
hot-stage apparatus attached to a Reichert microscope. Infra-
red (IR) spectra were recorded in nujol mulls on either a
Hitachi 270-30 grating spectrophotometer or an ATI Mattson
Genesis FT spectrophotometer. Thin layer chromatography
(TLC) was carried out on Kieselgel 60 F254 (Merck) on alu-
minium backed plates. NMR spectra were recorded on a
Varian Gemini 200 spectrophotometer operating at 199.8
MHz (1H) and 50.4 MHz (13C). Mass spectra were recorded
using a VG ZAB 2HF spectrometer operating at 70 eV.
3
8.2 Hz, NCH ; 3.48, t, J 8.2 Hz, SCH . 13C NMR (CDCl ) d:
2
2
3
172.20, CN; 164.76, C1; 139.64, C4; 128.19, 126.98, C5, C3;
117.98, C6; 115.78, C2; 63.17, NCH ; 32.24, SCH .
2
2
Acknowledgements
Funding by the Australian Research Council is gratefully
acknowledged.
Syntheses
N,N-Dimethylformamide (Aldrich) was distilled under
reduced pressure and stored under dry nitrogen. Water was
puriÐed using the Milli-Q reagent system. Bulk methanol was
puriÐed by distillation prior to use. The reagents used in
ligand preparations were either of good commercial quality or
were prepared by standard methods. Ligands 2 and 3 were
prepared by literature methods and were characterised by IR
spectroscopy, NMR spectroscopy and molecular mass.17,18
References
1
2
C. S. Cronan and C. L. SchoÐeld, Science, 1979, 204, 304.
M. Havas and J. F. Jaworski, Aluminum in the Canadian Environ-
ment, NRCC Report 24759, National Research Council of
Canada, Ottowa, 1986.
3
4
T. L. Macdonald and R. B. Martin, T IBS, 1988, 13, 15.
C. Baird, Environmental Chemistry, W. H. Freeman and Co., New
York, 2nd edn., 1998.
5
6
N. Fimreite, O. ^. Hansen and H. C. Pettersen, Bull. Environ.
4-Bromo-2-(4,5-dihydro-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)phenol, 4. A solu-
tion of 2-aminoethanethiol hydrochloride (397 mg, 3.5 mmol),
triethylamine (1.1 cm3, 7.89 mmol) and 5-bromo-2-hydroxy-
benzonitrile (610 mg, 3.08 mmol) in ethanol (8 cm3) was
heated at reÑux for 2.5 h. The solution was cooled to room
temperature and water (15 cm3) was added. The yellow pre-
cipitate was collected by vacuum Ðltration and dried for 24 h
over P O to yield 4, (0.609 g, 76%). MP 113È118 ¡C. (Found:
Contam. T oxicol., 1997, 58, 1.
H. Aikoh and M. R. Nishio, Bull. Environ. Contam. T oxicol.,
1996, 56, 1.
7
8
R. B. Martin, Clin. Chem. (W ashington, D.C.), 1986, 32, 1797.
J. D. Birchall and J. S. Chappell, Clin. Chem. (W ashington, D.C.),
1988, 34, 265.
9
J. Denton and D. H. Oughton, Ambio, 1993, 22, 19.
10 J. M. de la Fuente, V. RamirezÈRodriguez, J. L. CabreraÈPonce
and L. HerreraÈEstrella, Science, 1997, 276, 1566.
11 R. Y. Tsien, T. Possan and T. J. Rink, J. Cell. Biol., 1982, 94, 325.
12 G. Grynkiewicz, M. Poenie and R. Y. Tsien, J. Biol. Chem., 1985,
260, 3440.
13 P. D. Zalewski, I. J. Forbes, R. F. Seamark, R. Borlinghaus,
W. H. Betts, S. F. Lincoln and A. D. Ward, Chem. Biol., 1994, 1,
153.
2
5
C, 41.97; H, 3.08; N, 5.43; S, 12.58%. C H NOSBr requires C,
9
8
41.88; H, 3.12; N, 5.43; S, 12.42%) IR: 2674 (OH), 1592 (C2C),
1016 cm~1 (CN). MS m/z 259/257 (M`, 100/98.5%). 1H NMR
(CDCl ) d: 12.72, s, OH; 7.52, d, J 2.4 Hz, H3; 7.42, dd, J 2.4,
3
8.8 Hz, H5; 6.90, d, J 8.8 Hz, H6; 4.49, t, J 8.4 Hz, NCH ;
2
New J. Chem., 2000, 24, 541È546
545