above regarding the limited accuracy of this localised descrip-
tion. The higher-energy transitions will include the
Ru[d(p)] ] bipy MLCT transitions which are still expected.
There are various possibilities for the broad near-IR tran-
sition at ca. 1650 nm. Its position and intensity are consistent
with an inter-valence charge-transfer, either (i) from Ru(II) to
Ru(III) following a metal-centred oxidation,20 or (ii) from an
electron-rich to an electron-poor end of the bridging ligand
following a ligand-centred oxidation which is localised at one
Conclusion
The new complex 3` has rich electrochemical behaviour,
being the Ðrst member of a four-membered redox series which
spans 3` to 34`. A UV/VIS/NIR spectroelectrochemical
study showed the presence of intense transitions in the visible
and near-IR region of the spectrum in all four oxidation
states. These could be assigned to a limited extent with the
help of ZINDO calculations on the complex in its dia-
magnetic oxidation states, which indicated that strong mixing
between metal and ligand-centred orbitals results in delocal-
isation of the frontier orbitals, such that simple assignment of
individual redox processes as metal- or ligand-based is not
appropriate. The intense transitions in the near-IR region, and
their strong variation with oxidation state over a four-
membered redox series, make this compound of interest as an
electrochromic near-IR dye.10h13
end.21,22 In addition the spectrum of [MNi(CTH)N (l-L)]2`, in
2
which the bridging ligand has been oxidised to (L2~)~, shows a
transition at 1660 nm (e B 3000 dm3 mol~1 cm~1) which was
assigned to an intra-ligand transition involving the SOMO. It
is likely that the true situation is a combination of these, with
the low-energy transition being an “end-to-endÏ charge-
transfer from the non-oxidised Ru/dioxolene fragment to the
oxidised one; it will therefore have both intra-ligand and
charge-transfer character.
Acknowledgements
We thank the EPSRC for a project studentship (A.M.B.).
Further oxidation to 33` results in the further red-shift of
the ““Ru(II) ] LÏÏ MLCT transition to 1237 nm (e \ 41 000
dm3 mol~1 cm~1), and the reduction in intensity of the
weaker transition at 1650 nm that was apparent for 32`. Since
this oxidation state is diamagnetic we could again carry out a
ZINDO calculation to determine the molecular orbitals and
help assign the electronic spectrum. The intense 1237 nm tran-
References
1
2
3
C. G. Pierpont and C. W. Lange, Prog. Inorg. Chem., 1994, 41,
331.
A. B. P. Lever, H. Masui, R. A. Metcalfe, D. J. Stufkens, E. S.
Dodsworth and P. R. Auburn, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1993, 125, 317.
S. I. Gorelsky, E. S. Dodsworth, A. B. P. Lever and A. A. Vlcek,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 1998, 174, 469.
sition (predicted j \ 1010 nm; predicted e \ 140 000 dm3
max
mol~1 cm~1)¤ is the HOMO ([11.70 eV) ] LUMO ([8.83
eV) transition, and we can draw an analogy with the mono-
4
5
A. S. Attia and C. G. Pierpont, Inorg. Chem., 1998, 37, 3051.
O. S. Jung, D. H. Jo, Y. A. Lee, B. J. Conklin and C. G. Pierpont,
Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36, 19.
nuclear complex [Ru(bipy) (q)]2` in which there is a Ru ] q
2
MLCT transition into the low-lying orbital of the quinone
6
M. Haga, E. S. Dodsworth and A. B. P. Lever, Inorg. Chem.,
1986, 25, 447.
which is now empty following two ligand-centred oxidations.6
However examination of the form of the HOMO and LUMO
of 33` shows that this transition has very little MLCT charac-
ter, as these frontier orbitals contain comparable contribu-
tions from metal and bridging ligand. The principal
contributions to the HOMO are 36% from the Ru d(p)
orbitals, with the remaining 64% evenly distibuted across the
bridging ligand; for the LUMO the relative contributions are
25% from the metals and 75% from the bridging ligand. Thus
the HOMO ] LUMO transition has only slight MLCT char-
acter; it is more accurately a p ] p* transition between two
“metal ] bridging ligandÏ delocalised orbitals. We note also
the presence of residual absorbance at around 1650 nm in the
spectrum of 33` which is not accounted for by the ZINDO
calculation [Fig. 6(b)]; the cause of this is not clear at the
moment.
Finally, oxidation to 34` results in replacement of the
1237 nm transition of 33` by one at much higher energy, at
775 nm (e \ 54 000 dm3 mol~1 cm~1) with a low-energy
shoulder at ca. 1100 nm. Assuming that the electron is
removed from the HOMO of 33` this is a highly delocalised
transition which cannot be simply described as metal- or
ligand-centred. By analogy with the spectrum of 32` we
assume that the relatively weak, lowest-energy transition at
1100 nm involves the singly-occupied orbital, and that the
much more intense transition at 775 nm is a charge-transfer
transition of some sort.
7
8
M. D. Ward, Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 1712.
L. F. Joulie, E. Schatz, M. D. Ward, F. Weber and L. J. Yellow-
lees, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton T rans., 1994, 799.
9
A. M. Barthram, R. L. Cleary, J. C. Je†ery, S. M. Couchman and
M. D. Ward, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1998, 267, 1.
10 A. M. Barthram, R. L. Cleary, R. Kowallick and M. D. Ward,
Chem. Commun., 1998, 2695.
11 J. Fabian, H. Nakazumi and M. Matsuoka, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92,
1197.
12 (a) R. J. Mortimer, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1997, 26, 147; (b) R. J. Morti-
mer, Electrochim. Acta, 1999, 44, 2971.
13 N. C. Harden, E. R. Humphrey, J. C. Je†ery, S.-M. Lee, M. Mar-
caccio, J. A. McCleverty, L. H. Rees and M. D. Ward, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton T rans., 1999, 2417.
14 A. Dei, D. Gatteschi and L. Pardi, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1991, 189,
125.
15 D. A. Shultz, S. H. Bodnar, R. K. Kumar and J. W. Kampf, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 10664.
16 D. A. Shultz and S. H. Bodnar, Inorg. Chem., 1999, 38, 591.
17 S.-M. Lee, R. Kowallick, M. Marcaccio, J. A. McCleverty and
M. D Ward, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton T rans., 1998, 3443.
18 B. P. Sullivan, D. J. Salmon and T. J. Meyer, Inorg. Chem., 1978,
17, 3334.
19 ZINDO version 4.0.2 in the CAChe system, Oxford Molecular,
Oxford, 1998.
20 M. D. Ward, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1995, 121.
21 N. C. Fletcher, T. C. Robinson, A. Behrendt, J. C. Je†ery, Z. R.
Reeves and M. D. Ward, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton T rans., 1999,
2999.
22 P. R. Auburn and A. B. P. Lever, Inorg. Chem., 1990, 29, 2551.
504
New J. Chem., 2000, 24, 501È504