Tuning Charge Recombination Rate Constants
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 39, No. 17, 2000 3769
center. Charge-transfer transitions have also been previously
observed in the excited-state absorption spectra of Os(II)
coordination compounds with phosphine ligands.17
We consider two possible kinetic limits based on eqs 3 and
4 that are consistent with the observed results. The first is that
eq 3 represents a rapid preequilibrium, ka + kd . k4. In this
case, the measured quenching rate constant is approximately
equal to the product of the equilibrium constant and the exciplex
quenching rate; i.e., kq ∼ k4K3. Alternatively, if solvent addition
to the excited state is slow such that ka + kd , k4, then
equilibrium is not achieved and kq ∼ ka.
[Cu(dmb)(PPh3)2]+* excited-state relaxation measured by
transient absorption is first order with a lifetime of 80 ns at
room temperature, while the time-resolved photoluminescence
displays this component and a fast component (or component(s))
that could not be time-resolved. The discrepancy between the
transient photoluminescence and absorption data indicates either
is an emissive impurity present in low concentrations or that
the change in extinction coefficient between the ground state
and the fast component(s) excited state(s) is too small to be
detected by absorption. We note that the fast component is
present in rigorously purified [Cu(dmb)(PPh3)2]+* and in other
substituted bpy complexes but is not observed for [Cu(dmp)-
(PPh3)2]+*, where dmp is 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline.18
The origin of the short-lived luminescent component is the
subject of ongoing studies.19
Table 1 shows that the Lewis base induced excited-state-
quenching rate constant, kq, of [Cu(dmb)(PPh3)2]+* is inversely
related to the first-order rate constant, kcr, and activation
enthalpy, ∆Hq, for charge recombination observed after pulsed
light excitation of [Cu(bpy-MV2+)(PPh3)2]3+. The proposed
mechanism for charge recombination and solvent coordination
is shown in eqs 5 and 6. In contrast to the excited-state chemistry
ka′
[CuII(bpy-MV•+)(PPh3)2]3+ + S y
\
z
kd′
Solvent Tuning. The [Cu(dmb)(PPh3)2]+* MLCT excited
state is dynamically quenched by the addition of Lewis bases
to the dichloromethane solution. The quenching follows the
Stern-Volmer model, and the quenching rate constants vary
from ∼8 × 107 M-1 s-1 for tetrahydrofuran to 8.3 × 108 M-1
s-1 for DMSO. McMillin and co-workers have observed similar
behavior for [Cu(dmp)2]+* and other emissive Cu(I) diimines
and have explored the phenomena in considerable detail.20 Their
results and interpretation are consistent with quenching via a
5-coordinate Lewis base excited state adduct, or “exciplex”. An
exciplex, by definition, is unstable with respect to ground-state
products, and formation promotes nonradiative decay. In support
of this mechanism being operative for [Cu(dmb)(PPh3)2]+*
quenching, trends in measured quenching constants, where
comparisons are possible, are in agreement with this previous
work.20 Furthermore, at the irradiances utilized here, only a
shortened excited state is observed with no spectroscopic
evidence for 5-coordinate Cu(I) compounds, ground-state ad-
ducts, or other chemical products.
[(S)CuII(bpy-MV•+)(PPh3)2]3+ (5)
kcr
[(S)CuII(bpy-MV•+)(PPh3)2]3+ 9
8
[CuI(bpy-MV2+)(PPh3)2]3+ + S (6)
of [Cu(dmb)(PPh3)2]+, “full” electron transfer to the viologen
moiety yields a spectroscopically distinguishable intermediate
attributed to the solvent adduct, [(S)CuII(bpy-MV•+)(PPh3)2]3+
;
that is, K5 . 1 and the reaction is rate-limited by eq 6. This is
consistent with eqs 3 and 5, both being rapid equilibria with K3
, 1 and K5 . 1 due to the stronger Lewis acidity of the CuII
center in the charge-separated state compared to the more
electron delocalized d f π* excited state. The charge recom-
bination reaction is therefore rate-limited by kcr and kobs ∼ kcr.
The solvent donor strength correlations with excited-state-
quenching rate constants, charge recombination rates, and
enthalpies of activation support the notion that inner-sphere
coordination controls the charge recombination rate: the stronger
the CuII-S bond strength, the longer-lived the charge-separated
state.
The quenching rate constants abstracted from Stern-Volmer
analysis are below what one would expect for a diffusion-limited
process in dichloromethane, kdiff ) 1.6 × 1010 M-1 s-1 on the
basis of the Smoluchowski-Stokes-Einstein equations.21 To
account for the relatively low quenching constants measured, a
simplified mechanism depicted by eqs 3 and 4 is proposed where
Conclusion
Two Cu(I) coordination compounds, [Cu(bpy-MV2+)(PPh3)2]-
(PF6)3 and [Cu(dmb)(PPh3)2](PF6), have been prepared and
characterized. An interesting solvent correlation was discovered
that relates the excited-state-quenching efficiency of the latter
compound to the electron-transfer dynamics of the former. This
correlation is consistent with the hypothesis that inner-sphere
coordination underlies the remarkable solvent tuning of the
electron-transfer dynamics. The data supporting this hypothesis
are compelling yet indirect. Future studies will be directed
toward utilizing time-resolved vibrational spectroscopies of
ka
[CuII(dmb-)(PPh3)2]+* + S y
\
kz
d
[(S)CuII(dmb-)(PPh3)2]+* (3)
k4
[(S)CuII(dmb-)(PPh3)2]+*
9
8 [CuI(dmb)(PPh3)2]+ + S (4)
S is a solvent molecule that acts as a Lewis base quencher. An
important consequence of invoking a composite mechanism is
that the measured quenching constants, kq, may not be elemen-
tary rate constants.20
(18) Ruthkosky, M. Ph.D. Thesis, The Johns Hopkins University, 1998.
(19) Scaltrito, D. V.; O’Callaghan, J. A.; Meyer, G. J. Work in progress.
(20) (a) McMillin, D. R.; Kirchoff, J. R.; Goodwin, K. V. Coord. Chem.
ReV. 1985, 64, 83. (b) Palmer, C. E. A.; McMillin, D. R.; Kirmaier,
C.; Holten, D. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 3167. (c) Stacy, E. M.;
McMillin, D. R. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 393-396.
The adduct shown as the product of eq 3 is not a simple
encounter complex but must be thought of as an excited-state
complex, or “exciplex”. The exciplex has never been directly
observed, but the indirect evidence for its presence is compel-
ling.20 Since both the transient absorption and PL spectra are
essentially independent of solvent and since the spectral
properties of the 5-coordinate solvent adducts are expected to
differ significantly from those of the 4-coordinate complex,22
it seems reasonable to conclude that the transient species
observed is the uncomplexed MLCT excited state [Cu(dmb)-
(PPh3)2]+*.
(21) Murov, S. L.; Carmichael, I.; Hug, G. L. Handbook of Photrochemistry,
2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1993; pp 207-208.
(22) (a) Stumpf, H. O.; Pei, Y.; Ouahab, L.; Le Berre, F.; Codjovi, E.;
Kahn, O. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 5687. (b) Persson, I.; Penner-Hahn,
J. E.; Hodgson, K. O. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 2497. (c) Tezuka, Y.;
Hashimoto, A.; Ushizaka, K.; Imai, K. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 329.
(d) Bencini, A.; Gatteschi, D.; Zanchini, C. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25,
2211. (e) Stibrany, R. T.; Knapp, S.; Potenza, J. A.; Schugar, H. J.
Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 132.