in the reaction sequence is through dehydrogenative biaryl
coupling (Scheme 1). Although this approach is flexible with
poses regioselective control by exploiting the problematic
C5-substituent (R3) to block coupling at C5, thereby,
preventing regioisomer formation. The requisite precursor
2, in turn, could be derived from a Negishi reaction of
biphenylzinc reagent 3 and a triflate derived from indolizidine
4. Having recently developed a concise route to six-
membered cyclic enaminones involving the cyclization of
amino acid derived ynones,7 we thought these versatile
synthons would be apt precursors to enantiomerically pure
phenanthropiperidines. The third C-C bond could be realized
through a Suzuki-Miyaura biaryl coupling reaction from
iodobromobenzene (5) and boronic acid (6) precursors.
First looking to the indolizidine fragment, we began our
synthesis with commercially available Boc-D-ꢀ-homoproline
(Scheme 3). Weinreb amide R-7 could be formed directly
Scheme 1. Typical Strategy for Synthesis of Phenanthrene Moiety
respect to the aryl substituents being installed, it poses a
noteworthy limitation on the accessibility of particular
phenanthrene substitution patterns. Specifically, these reac-
tions cannot accommodate sterically disfavored substituents,
such as the obtrusive C5-methoxy group seen in tylocrebrine
(1a), with any practical degree of selectivity.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Weinreb Amide
To avoid the problem of regioselectivity, we designed a
new approach for the phenanthrene construction that involved
three sequential C-C bond forming steps (Scheme 2). The
Scheme 2. Phenanthroindolizidine Retrosynthetic Analysis
using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDCI).
In order to facilitate library development, a scalable approach
was developed for the synthesis of the racemic Weinreb
amide (()-7. Boc-pyrrolidinone was reduced to hemiaminal
9 and then subjected to HWE conditions. The resultant ring-
opened ester spontaneously cyclized to provide the racemic
ꢀ-proline derivative 10. Amide (()-7 was then obtained from
ester 10 using conditions reported by Williams et al.8
Although this sequence is more lengthy than that of amide
R-7, the payoff is the ease and economy of scale-up.
Constructing the indolizidine fragment was our next goal.
We have conducted extensive studies into the formation of
cyclic enaminones from ꢀ-amino ynones.7 Grignard addition
of ethynylmagnesium bromide to Weinreb amide R-7 provided
the desired ynone 11 in excellent yield (Scheme 4).
Indolizidine formation could be achieved using our
one-pot deprotection/cyclization strategy. Either 4 N HCl
in dioxane or NaI in HCO2H can be used for Boc-
deprotection.7b Although the yields of the latter conditions
(i.e., NaI/HCO2H) were generally higher, workup following
the cyclization was easier using the HCl method. It should
be noted that the use of HCl promotes retro-Michael/
Michael-type racemization of the ꢀ-stereocenter and, there-
fore, was not used for constructing indolizidine R-4. With
key step is the final ring closure, involving an aryl-alkene
dehydrogenative coupling. Unlike the standard biaryl-
coupling strategy to phenanthrenes, this disconnection im-
(6) For selected recent examples, see: (a) Yang, X.; Shi, Q.; Bastow,
K. F.; Lee, K. H. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1416–1419. (b) Wang, K. L.; Su, B.;
Wang, Z. W.; Wu, M.; Li, Z.; Hu, Y. N.; Fan, Z. J.; Mi, N.; Wang, Q. M.
J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2010, 58, 2703–2709. (c) Stoye, A.; Opatz, T. Org.
Lett. 2010, 12, 2140–2141. (d) Dumoulin, D.; Lebrun, S.; Couture, A.;
Deniau, E.; Grandclaudon, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 1943–1950. (e)
Yamashita, S.; Kurono, N.; Senboku, H.; Tokuda, M.; Orito, K. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2009, 1173–1180. (f) Wang, K.; Su, B.; Wang, Z.; Wu, M.;
Li, Z.; Hu, Y.; Fan, Z.; Mi, N.; Wang, Q. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 58,
2703–2709. (g) Li, S. T.; Han, L.; Sun, L.; Zheng, D.; Liu, J.; Fu, Y. B.;
Huang, X. S.; Wang, Z. Y. Molecules 2009, 14, 5042–5053. (h) Cui, M. B.;
Wang, Q. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 5445–5451.
(7) (a) Turunen, B. J.; Georg, G. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8702–
8703. (b) Niphakis, M. J.; Turunen, B. J.; Georg, G. I. J. Org. Chem. 2010,
75, 6793–6805.
(8) Williams, J. M.; Jobson, R. B.; Yasuda, N.; Marchesini, G.; Dolling,
U. H.; Grabowski, E. J. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5461–5464.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 2, 2011
197