LFP Evidence for Styryl Radical Cation Cyclization
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 65, No. 19, 2000 6171
by stirring overnight, then filtration and distillation. 31P NMR
synthesis and in probing biological reaction mechanisms.
The results also provide supporting evidence for the
reaction mechanism proposed in Scheme 1 with initial
formation of radical cation 10, analogous to 2b, at least
when a stabilizing 4-methoxy substituent is attached to
the phenyl ring. Unfortunately, no spectroscopic evidence
for the intermediates analogous to 3-5 was encoun-
tered.23
(121.4 MHz, CDCl3): δ 150.21 [lit.25 δ 151.0].
P r ep a r a tion of 2-(4-Meth oxyp h en yl)-2-p r op en e. A pro-
cedure adapted from Maryanoff and Reitz26 was used. To a
stirred solution of methyl triphenylphosphonium bromide (48
g, 0.13 mol) in dry tetrahydrofuran (500 mL), cooled to -20
°C, was added 2.5 M of n-BuLi in hexane (53 mL, 0.13 mol)
via syringe. After 30 min of stirring at -20 °C, 4-methoxy-
acetophenone (10 g, 67 mmol) was added in one portion. The
reaction was quenched with water (100 mL) and extracted with
tetrahydrofuran (3 × 50 mL) which was washed with aqueous
sodium chloride (3 × 50 mL). The organic layer was dried over
magnesium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to give
a brown oil. Distillation in vacuo (bp 51 °C at 0.35 Torr) yielded
white crystals (8.1 g, 82% yield); mp 33.5-34.5 °C (lit.27 32.0-
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l Meth od s. Starting materials were obtained from
Aldrich or Acros and, unless otherwise indicated, were used
without further purification. Anhydrous solvents were ob-
tained as follows: diethyl ether (Et2O), tetrahydrofuran (THF),
and benzene were distilled over sodium/benzophenone under
nitrogen; methylene chloride and acetonitrile were distilled
over calcium hydride under argon. Triethylamine and diiso-
propylamine were distilled over calcium hydride prior to use.
Benzophenone was recrystallized from ethanol. All atmosphere-
sensitive reaction solutions were prepared under argon using
glovebag techniques and then run under argon. Analytical
thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on Merck
silica gel 60 F254 precoated silica gel plates. Column chroma-
tography was carried out with silica gel 60 (230-400 mesh)
from Mallinckrodt. Chromatography performed on a Chro-
matotron7 7924T apparatus utilized silica gel 60 PF254 contain-
ing gypsum purchased from EM Science. Distillations were
performed on a short-path distillation apparatus. Melting
points are uncorrected. Elemental analyses were carried out
by Atlantic Microlab, Inc., Norcross, GA, and by Midwest
Microlab, LLC, Indianapolis, IN.
1
4
32.5 °C). H NMR (299.7 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.13 (dd, J ) 1.5
4
4
2
Hz, J ) 0.7 Hz, 3H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 4.99 (dq, J ) 1.5 Hz, J )
2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (dq, 2J ) 2.4 Hz, 4J ) 0.7 Hz, 1H), 6.85-
7.43 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ 21.91 (CH3),
55.25, 110.64, 113.51, 126.58, 133.70, 159.04, 142.52; LRMS
(EI) m/z 148 (M+, 53), 135 (78), 105 (44), 89 (65), 77 (87), 61
(20), 51 (20), 43 (47), 28 (100). HRMS (EI): calcd for C10H12
O
[M+] 148.0888. Found: 148.0909. Anal. Calcd for C10H12O: C,
81.04; H, 8.16. Found: C, 81.22; H, 8.29.
P r ep a r a tion of 4-Meth oxya cetop h en on e Tosylh yd r a -
zon e. A solution of 4-methoxyacetophenone (60 g, 0.40 mol)
in methanol (500 mL) was magnetically stirred at room
temperature for 5 min. Tosylhydrazide (93 g, 0.50 mol) was
added in one portion followed by 2 drops of concentrated
hydrochloric acid. The reaction solution was stirred for another
3 h at room temperature, monitored by TLC, and then placed
in
a freezer overnight. The hydrazone precipitated from
solution as a white solid that was washed with 250 mL of cold
methanol and then dried in vacuo overnight to give 125 g (98%
yield): mp 164.5-165.5 °C (dec) [lit.28 mp 166-168 °C (dec)].
HRMS (EI): calcd for C16H18N2O3S [M+] 318.1038. Found
318.1037. Anal. Calcd for C16H18N2O3S: C, 60.36; H, 5.70.
Found: C, 60.44; H, 5.75.
NMR a n d GC Mea su r em en ts. Proton (1H), carbon (13C),
and phosphorus (31P) NMR spectra were recorded routinely
and referenced to the usual standards. NMR splitting patterns
are designated as s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet),
quin (quintet), sept (septet), and m (multiplet). Coupling
constants (J ) are in hertz. J values refer to proton-proton
coupling unless otherwise stated. 13C NMR J values designate
carbon-phosphorus couplings. Gas chromatography (GC) was
performed in the FID mode on 20 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm
fused silica DB-1 phase capillary column. GC-MS (EI) mea-
surements (70 eV) utilized a 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm fused
silica HP-1 phase capillary column. High-resolution EIMS
measurements also were at 70 eV. The molecular ion is
indicated by [M+].
La ser F la sh P h otolysis. The flash photolysis system has
been described in detail elsewhere.24 For these experiments a
Lumonics HY750 Nd:YAG laser (355 nm, 10 ns/pulse, <50 mJ /
pulse) was used for sample excitation. Samples were contained
in 7 × 7 mm2 quartz cells and were deaerated by purging with
oxygen prior to laser irradiation.
P r epar ation of 2-(4-Meth oxyph en yl)-2-pr open -1-ol. The
method was adapted from that of Chamberlin and co-work-
ers.29 To a stirred solution of 4-methoxyacetophenone tosyl-
hydrazone (10 g, 31 mmol) and tetrahydrofuran (300 mL) at 0
°C under argon was added, dropwise, 2.5 M n-BuLi in hexane
(42 mL, 0.10 mol) via syringe. The resulting red solution was
stirred at 0 °C until the evolution of N2 gas was complete.
Paraformaldehyde (1.9 g, 63 mmol), dried overnight over
phosphorus pentoxide in a desiccator, was added in one
portion. The reaction mixture changed color from dark red to
creamy yellow. The stirred solution was warmed to room
temperature and held overnight or until completion of the
reaction (monitored by TLC). The reaction was quenched with
aqueous ammonium chloride (100 mL) and extracted with
ethyl acetate (3 × 50 mL) which was dried over anhydrous
magnesium sulfate. The solution was concentrated in vacuo
to give a dark brown oil that was purified by column chroma-
tography on silica gel (eluted with 10% triethylamine, 30%
ethyl acetate-hexanes) to give a solid, recrystallized from ethyl
acetate/hexanes to yield white crystals (2.9 g, 55% yield): mp
Dim eth yl N,N-d iisop r op ylp h osp h or a m id ite was rou-
tinely prepared by coaddition under argon of a solution of
(isoPr2N)2PCl (94 g, 0.46 mol) in diethyl ether (100 mL) and
triethylamine (94 g, 0.93 mol) in methanol (30 g, 0.93 mol) to
650 mL of stirred diethyl ether at room temperature, followed
1
78-79 °C [lit.29 mp 71-73 °C]. H NMR (300.1 MHz, CDCl3):
4
δ 1.80 (s, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 4.50 (s, 2H), 5.25 (dt, J ) 1.5 Hz,
(23) A reviewer has suggested that these SET processes involve back
electron transfer from the DCA anion radical to 2b or 10 to generate
the triplet excited state of 1 and 9, respectively, that then leads to
phosphonate via mechanisms previously proposed by the Bentrude
group8 for triplet excited states of allyl phosphites formed by triplet
sensitization. This is highly unlikely, however, because of (1) the
predicted low efficiency of initial triplet ion pair generation, (2) the
likely inability of the bimolecular electron transfer to 2b or 10 to
compete with cyclization to 3 or 11, and (3) the likelihood that electron
transfer from DCA anion radical to phosphite radical cation would not
be exoergic enough to generate triplet phosphite efficiently. Further-
more, the close similarity in values (ca. 0.025) for the quantum
efficiency of phosphonate formation from 1 and from its counterpart
with phosphorus in a six-membered ring when excited singlet DCA is
the SET agent1 is contrary to the known at least 100-fold greater
efficiency of triplet sensitized reaction of 1.8
2J ) 1.2 Hz, 1H), 5.38 (dt, 2J ) 1.2 Hz, 4J ) 0.7 Hz, 1H), 6.85-
7.42 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ 55.27, 65.10,
111.05, 113.85, 127.18, 130.83, 159.37, 146.50. Anal. Calcd for
C
10H12O2: C, 73.15; H, 7.37. Found: C, 72.87; H, 7.37.
P r ep a r a tion of Dim eth yl 2-(4-Meth oxyp h en yl)-2-p r o-
p en -1-yl P h osp h ite (9). A solution of 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-
(25) Mag, M.; Engels, J . W. Nucleosides Nucleotides 1988, 7, 725.
(26) Maryanoff, B. E.; Reitz, A. B. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 863.
(27) Deno, N. C.; Frederick, A. K.; Peterson, H. J . J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1965, 87, 2157.
(28) McMahon, R. J .; Chapman, O. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109,
683.
(24) Kazanis, S.; Azarani, A.; J ohnston, L. J . J . Phys. Chem. 1991,
95, 4430.
(29) Chamberlin, A. R.; Stemke, J . E.; Bond, F. T. Tetrahedron Lett.
1986, 27, 5579.