Table 2. Tm Data for the Oligonucleotides Hybridized to Complementary RNAa
12, 16, 20, 27
13, 17, 21, 28
∆Tm/unit
14, 18, 22, 29
∆Tm/unit
t
Tm
∆Tm/unit
Tm
Tm
thymidine
62.3
67.8
69.2
69.5
67.1
48.3
50.0
60.0
61.0
60.8
61.8
62.1
66.0
66.9
66.2
2′-O-DMAEAc-5-methyluridine
2′-O-NMAc-5-methyluridine
2′-O-NAc-5-methyluridine
2′-O-DMAc-5-methyluridine
1.4
1.7
1.8
1.2
0.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
0.1
1.0
1.3
1.1
a Oligonucleotides 12, 16, 20, 27: 5′ d(tCC AGG tGt CCG CAt C) 3′. Oligonucleotides 13, 17, 21, 28: 5′ d(GCG ttt ttt ttt tGC G) 3′. Oligonucleotides
14, 18, 22, 29: 5′ d(CTC GTA Ctt ttC CGG TCC) 3′. Tm values were assessed in 100 mM Na+, 10 mM phosphate, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7 at 260 nm, with
4 µM oligonucleotides and 4 µM complementary length matched RNA. Experimental error did not exceed (0.5 °C.
In view of these facts, an alternative approach was taken
for the synthesis of the 2′-O-DMAc modified oligonucle-
otides. The nucleoside 4 was treated with 2 M dimethylamine
in THF for 18 h at room temperature to give 24 in 95%
isolated yield (Scheme 2). This was then converted into a
3′-phosphoramidite 25 and a solid support 26 in a conven-
tional manner.
and 29, demonstrated a duplex stabilization of 1.1-1.3 and
1.9-2.1 °C per modification as compared to the correspond-
ing 2′-deoxy phosphodiester oligonucleotides (PO) and their
phosphorothioate (PS) analogues,11 respectively. Oligonucle-
otides 16, 20, and 27 with four dispersed modifications
stabilized the duplex with RNA by 1.2-1.8 and 2-2.6 °C,
compared to the corresponding PO and PS analogues,
respectively.11 These values are slightly better than the Tm
enhancements observed for 2′-OMe and 2′-O-MOE modi-
fications.
Scheme 2 a
The oligonucleotides 12, 13, and 14 bearing cationic
dimethylamino groups demonstrated a significant dependence
of the melting temperatures (Tm) on the distance between
the modified nucleoside residues. Compounds 13 and 14 with
consecutively placed dimethylamino groups showed only a
moderate increase in Tm (0.1-0.2 °C per modification
compared to the PO control). In contrast, a Tm enhancement
of 1.4 °C per modification was observed for oligonucleotide
12 where dimethylamino groups were dispersed. These
observations are in agreement with the reported hybridization
profile of oligonucleotides bearing 2′-O-aminopropyl and
homologous groups.12,1c
a Reagents and conditions: (i) 2 M dimethylamine in THF, rt.
(ii) 2-Cyanoethyl-N,N,N′,N′-tetraisopropylphosphorodiamidite, N,N-
diisopropylammonium tetrazolide, CH3CN, rt. (iii) (a) succinic
anhydride, ClCH2CH2Cl, DMAP, (C2H5)3N, rt; (b) TBTU, 4-me-
thylmorpholine, DMF, amino alkyl CPG, rt.
Comparison of the Tm values of 2′-O-NAc oligonucleotides
20-22 with their 2′-O-NMAc (16-18) and 2′-O-DMAc
analogues (27-29) demonstrated no significant difference
in their thermal stability. This suggested that the addition of
the steric bulk in the 2′-O-NMAc and 2′-O-DMAc oligo-
nucleotides did not affect their hybridization affinity to RNA.
The oligonucleotides 27-30 were assembled on the solid
support as described above for 8-11 except that the
phosphoramidite 25 and the solid support 26 were used
instead of 5 and 7. The solid support-bound material was
deprotected with methylamine (4% solution) in aqueous
ammonium hydroxide8 at room temperature for 24 h to give
27-30 with no major side products observed by ES MS
analysis of the crude material. The oligonucleotides obtained
were purified and characterized as described above. In
contrast, deprotection of 27-30 with concentrated aqueous
ammonium hydroxide at elevated temperature (55 °C, 6 h)
led to mixtures of the products where the dimethylamino
group in the 2′-O-DMAc side chain was partially displaced
with the amino group as evidenced by ES MS.
Specificity of hybridization of several 2′-modified oligo-
nucleotides including 2′-O-MOE against complementary
RNA reported in the literature was similar to that of
unmodified DNA.2a,11 We expect the specificity of hybridiza-
tion of the novel 2′-modified oligonucleotides described in
this Letter to be similar to that of unmodified DNA as well.
In contrast to results with complementary RNA, hybridiza-
tion with the complementary DNA led to duplexes less stable
than those formed with the corresponding PO controls (Table
3). These results demonstrated an RNA-selective hybridiza-
(11) Freier, S. M.; Altmann, K.-H. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 4429-
4443.
(12) Griffey, R. H.; Monia, B. P.; Cummins, L. L.; Freier, S.; Greig, M.
J.; Guinosso, C. J.; Lesnik, E.; Manalili, S. M.; Mohan, V.; Owens, S.;
Ross, B. R.; Sasmor, H.; Wancewicz, E.; Weiler, K.; Wheeler, P. D.; Cook,
P. D. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 5100-5109.
Hybridization of the modified oligonucleotides with
complementary RNA (Table 2) was studied. The oligonucle-
otides with consecutive modifications, 17, 18, 21, 22, 28,
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 4, 2003
405