Angewandte
Chemie
rely on the intrinsic reactivity of the electrophilic or
intermediacy of Vand its formation using Zn as a reductant.[17]
3
nucleophilic reaction partner.[11] C(sp ) C bond-forming
With a catalytic amount of nickel and 3 equivalents TMSCl,
cross-coupling to form the desired ether A was observed.
However, the selectivity for A varied significantly depending
on the identity of the ligand on nickel. Phosphine and amine
ligands commonly employed in cross-coupling were not
efficient in the reaction (entries 6–11). After extensive
ligand evaluation, it was found that highest cross-selectivity
could be achieved using the tridentate amine ligand 2,6-bis(N-
pyrazolyl)pyridine (bpp), which delivered the desired cross-
coupled product in 91% yield (entry 1).
À
reactions that feature the modularity of a cross-coupling
reaction but are applicable to heteroatom-containing, phar-
maceutically relevant structures like ethers are rare in the
field. Bode and co-workers have reported Lewis acid
catalyzed additions of Ar-BF3K salts to acetals.[12] However,
3
À
the conditions are restricted to primary C(sp ) C bond
formation. Molander and co-workers have shown that a-oxy
BF3K salts couple efficiently with aryl chlorides under
palladium catalysis.[13] However, these nucleophiles are not
readily available and the conditions for cross-coupling require
high temperature and strong base. Thus, we recognized that
a nickel-catalyzed approach from readily available acetals
and aryl halides could offer unprecedented mildness and
generality for the preparation of this structural motif.[14]
As shown in Figure 1c, we envisioned a catalytic cycle
initiated by oxidative addition of Ni0 (I) into an aryl halide.
The resulting NiII intermediate II would intercept an a-oxy
radical (V) generated from the acetal III, a Lewis acid, and
reductant such as Zn (Ered1/2 = À1.0 V vs SCE in MeCN),
delivering the NiIII adduct VI. Subsequent reductive elimi-
nation would afford the dialkylether VIII, releasing the NiI
species VII. Completion of the catalytic cycle requires
turnover of the nickel catalyst by a reductant to regenerate
I (Ered1/2[NiII/Ni0] = À1.2 V vs SCE in DMF).[15,16]
The bpp ligand has seen limited application in other
nickel-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions.[19] As such, we
sought to elucidate the structure and properties of a bpp-
ligated nickel species relevant to the catalytic reaction. Based
on our proposed mechanism, we chose to prepare the
nickel(I) chloride complex 1 (see VII in Figure 1c). Compro-
portionation of [Ni(cod)2] and NiCl2·DME in the presence of
2 equivalents of bpp provided the monomeric chloride
complex 1 as dark green crystals (Figure 2a). Importantly,
1 is catalytically competent, thus delivering dialkyl ether A in
64% yield under standard conditions. A single-crystal X-ray
diffraction study established that 1 adopts a slightly distorted
octahedral geometry in the solid state and associates as a m-
chloride dimer upon recrystallization from ethanol (Fig-
ure 2b).[20] The complex 1 exhibits an axial EPR signal with
gk = 2.262 and g? = 2.070, consistent with its formulation as
a d9 nickel(I) complex, rather than as a d8 nickel(II) species
with the radical residing in the bpp ligand (Figure 2c).
Computational experiments confirm that the unpaired spin
is localized exclusively on nickel in a dx2Ày2 orbital.[17] These
features are remarkably similar to those of [(terpy)NiBr] and
[(terpy)NiCl], as reported by Vicic[21] and Wieghardt[22]
respectively, with the exception that the terpy complexes
are monomeric and square-planar in the solid state. The redox
potential of [(bpp)NiCl] (Ered1/2 = À0.8 V vs. SCE in MeCN) is
also within 200 mV of those for [(terpy)NiI] halides.[23] Taken
together, these data do not provide an obvious parameter to
discriminate the selectivity observed between bpp and terpy
in this chemistry. Since the ligands themselves have more
distinct redox potentials (terpy: Ered1/2 = À2.2 V vs SCE in
MeCN; bpp: Ered1/2 = À0.9 V vs SCE in MeCN), it is possible
that the reaction selectivity arises at stages in the catalytic
cycle wherein oxidation/reduction of nickel is ligand-based.
With optimized reaction conditions in hand, we next
explored the generality of the transformation. High cross-
selectivity was observed with a variety of aryl iodides
(Table 2). Substitution around the aromatic ring was well
tolerated (3,4), though ortho-tolyl iodide (5) suffered from
rapid formation of 2,2’-bitolyl. Both electron-rich (7) and
electron-poor (9) aryl iodides coupled with equal levels of
efficiency.[24] This reactivity represents a significant advance
as methods to form alkyl ethers via oxocarbenium ions
typically rely on the inherent reactivity of the nucleophile and
are thus limited to electron-rich coupling partners.[11a,b] Nitro-
gen-containing heterocycles, which are common in pharma-
ceuticals, undergo the reaction in good yield (12 and 13).
Protic as well as Lewis-basic functionality is tolerated (14 and
15) and in the case of carbonyl-containing aryl iodides, no
We began our investigations by exploring the coupling of
benzaldehyde dimethylacetal with iodobenzene using TMSCl
as a Lewis acid and Zn as a reductant (Table 1).[18] In the
absence of a nickel catalyst, the acetal converts into a mixture
of rac- and meso-pinacol dimers (B), presumably via the a-
oxy radical V (entry 2). Indeed, trapping experiments using
(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO) deliver
77% yield of the TEMPO adduct, also supporting the
Table 1: Reaction optimization studies.
Entry
Deviation from standard conditions
Yield [%][a]
A
B
C
1
2
3
none
91
0
0
3
13
0
3
0
0
no NiCl2·DME
no Zn0
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
no TMSCl
1 equiv PhI
0
55
5
0
2
25
2
PPh3 instead of bpp[b]
dppbz instead of bpp
bpy instead of bpp
terpy instead of bpp
Ph-Box instead of bpp
Ph-PyBox instead of bpp
Mn0 instead of Zn0
30
28
10
11
39
27
15
35
10
31
35
0
4
38
10
2
0
23
38
35
[a] Determined by GC using dodecane as a quantitative internal
standard. [b] 20 mol% ligand loading. Box=bis(oxazoline),
DMA=N,N-dimethylacetamide, DME=dimethoxyethane.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 9876 –9880
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim