In this context, we came across a cyclic dienophile system
17 that could be classified as unconstrained (Type III). This
dienophile showed an exceptional exo and face selectivity
when it was allowed to react with cyclopentadiene, affording
adduct 2 as a single product (Scheme 1).8 The subsequent
in Scheme 2.13 It is noteworthy to mention that the reaction
of 1 with ethylmagnesium bromide also afforded the primary
Scheme 2
Scheme 1
cleavage of the cycloadduct double bond unveiled a highly
functionalized cyclopentane ring, which was proposed as a
versatile building block for several different natural products.9
More recently, we proved the feasibility of its transformation
into the angularly fused quinane skeleton of the antibiotic
pentalenolactone.10
The high exo selectivity observed with 1 is an interesting
example of an abnormal addition mode. Unfortunately, the
factors that determine the outcome of a cycloaddition process
can hardly ever be established. Even though in previous
studies Rousch11 and Takeda12 attributed the predominant
exo selectivity of some conformationally rigid cyclic s-cis
dienophiles to dipolar effects, in our case we could not
disregard the influence of steric or stereoelectronic effects
in their multiple forms. We hence decided to study the factors
affecting the stereoselectivity of this reaction by making
structural modifications on the original dienophile system
and comparing the outcome of the resulting cycloaddition.
Our first attempt involved the elongation of the exocyclic
hydrocarbon side chain by synthesizing the corresponding
methyl and ethyl ketones (3 and 8). This change should
increase the steric hindrance of the side chain and reveal
whether it has any influence on the exo selectivity. The
syntheses of ketones 3 and 8 from aldehyde 1 are outlined
alcohol 7 as a byproduct. The reduction of the carbonyl group
is known to compete with the addition process when the
carbonyl group is sterically hindered. Furthermore, in the
1H NMR spectrum of ethyl ketone 8, the signal for the
methylene group R to the carbonyl appeared as four quartets.
This coupling pattern can only be explained if the methylene
group has a restricted rotation around the single bond so both
protons are nonequivalent, which confirmed the steric
congestion around the carbonyl group.
The Diels-Alder reaction of the methyl ketone 2 afforded
only 12% yield of a mixture of exo-â/endo-â cycloadducts
(4 and 5)14 in a 2.2:1 ratio, even after 48 h. Under the same
experimental conditions the ethyl ketone 8 did not react.
(7) Spanevello, R. A.; Pellegrinet, S. C. Synth. Comm. 1995, 25, 3663.
(8) In a typical procedure, the dienophile 1 (3.750 g, 13.59 mmol) was
dissolved in dry acetonitrile (136 mL) and stirred during 30 min with
anhydrous LiClO4 (7.2345 g, 67.95 mmol). Freshly cracked cyclopentadiene
(9.125 mL, 135.90 mmol) was added under an inert atmosphere at room
temperature. The reaction was completed after 18 h. The mixture was diluted
with ethyl ether and washed with water. The organic layer was dried over
Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuum. Flash chromatography to remove
the excess of bicyclopentadiene afforded compound 2 (4.0480 g, 11.84
mmol) in 85% yield. The same results were obtained when the reaction
was catalyzed by BF3-OEt2 in methylene chloride at -78 °C or run under
thermal conditions in xylene at 80 °C, although in the later case the yield
was 51%. The 1H and 13C NMR signals of 2 were unequivocally assigned
by using homo- and heteronuclear 2D NMR techniques. The NOE observed
between C10-H and C13-H and between C12-H and C10-H (IUPAC
numbering) suggested the â approach. Further corroboration was obtained
from irradiation of C11-H and the carbonyl proton, which enhanced the
C8-H signal. The NOE observed between C11-H and one of the C15-H
showed the exo character of the addition.
A different structural modification was envisaged with the
purpose of gaining conformational flexibility. It implied the
cleavage of the benzylidene acetal ring and the subsequent
protection of the free hydroxyl groups as tert-butyl dimethyl
silyl ethers. Scheme 3 outlines the synthetic sequence
followed to obtain this derivative from known nitrile 9.7
In this case, the reaction of the dienophile 12 with
cyclopentadiene afforded a mixture of three different isomeric
products in 87% yield (Scheme 4). The exo-â cycloadduct
was again the main product, with a minor proportion of the
endo-â isomer and traces of a third adduct that could not be
purified from the mixture. The structure of the latter one
could not be unequivocally assigned, but as a result of the
(9) Pellegrinet, S. C.; Spanevello, R. A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997,
8, 1983.
(10) Pellegrinet, S. C.; Spanevello, R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
8623.
(13) All attempts to obtain these ketones directly from the aldehyde
precursor, the nitrile 9 (Scheme 3) through a nucleophilic addition were
fruitless.
(11) Rousch, W. R.; Brown, B. B. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 3380.
(12) Takeda, K.; Imaoka, I.; Yoshii, E. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 10839.
(14) The structure of the cycloadducts were assigned on the basis of the
NOE experiments as described in ref 8 for cycloadduct 2.
1074
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 8, 2000