10222
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10222-10223
A Novel and Efficient Synthesis of a Dimeric Lex
Oligosaccharide on Polymeric Support
Scheme 1. Concept of New Linker
Tong Zhu and Geert-Jan Boons*
Complex Carbohydrate Research Center
220 RiVerbend Road, Athens, Georgia 30602
ReceiVed June 1, 2000
Increased awareness of the biological importance of oligosac-
charides and glycoconjugates has stimulated the development of
efficient methods for the preparation of these compounds.
Improved chemical1 and enzymatic2 glycosylation procedures in
combination with convergent synthetic strategies make it possible
to execute multistep synthetic sequences that give well-defined
complex oligosaccharides in reasonable quantities. It is to be
expected that further improvements and eventually automation
will come from polymer-supported oligosaccharide synthesis.
Several relatively large oligosaccharides have been synthesized
on polymeric supports3 although most of these compounds were
relatively simple 1,2-trans linked linear homooligomers.
Herein, we report a highly efficient strategy for the polymer-
supported synthesis of the dimeric Lewis antigen Lewisx-Lewisx
(Lex-Lex).3b,d,4 Lewis antigens are an important family of tumor
associated antigens that offer promise for the development of
cancer vaccines for small cell lung, breast, prostate, lung, colon,
stomach, and ovary cancer.5 These branched compounds contain
both R- and â-glycosidic linkages attached to hindered hydroxyls
of a glucosamine moiety.
An important requirement for the synthesis of the target
compound is the selection of a set of temporary protecting groups
and a linker that are compatible with the acid-sensitive fucosidic
linkage. Furthermore, the linker and protecting groups should be
compatible with the base-sensitive amino protecting group
Trichloroethoxycarbonyl (Troc).6 Glycosyl donors protected with
this functionality are highly reactive and offer efficient neighbor-
ing group participation to give stereoselective formation of
â-glycosides. The Troc group also ensures high glycosyl accepting
properties of the C-3 hydroxyl of the glucosamine unit.4h
A strategy was adapted3f whereby a polymer-bound Lex
trisaccharide was prepared which could be converted into a
glycosyl acceptor by selective removal of a temporary protecting
group or into a soluble glycosyl donor by cleavage from the
polymeric support followed by activation of the anomeric center.
Coupling of the resulting glycosyl donor and acceptor followed
by cleavage from the solid support should give the target
hexasaccharide. This strategy requires a linker that attaches a
saccharide to a polymeric support via the anomeric center of the
reducing sugar.
To this end, a novel phenolic ester type linker was developed
(Scheme 1). The saccharide is attached to the polymer support
by glycosyaltion with the hydroxyl of the acyloxybenzyl linker.
Compared to well-established p-alkoxybenzyl glycosides, the
resulting p-acyloxybenzyl glycoside is significantly more stable
toward Lewis acidic conditions used in glycosylations. This bond,
however, is cleaved within minutes by treatment with hydrogen
peroxide/Et3N. After detachment, a stable p-hydroxyl benzyl
glycoside is obtained as a single anomer and this feature facilitates
purification. Oxidative removal of the p-hydroxyl benzyl moiety
with DDQ7 will give a lactol that can be easily converted into a
glycosyl donor (e.g. trichloroacetimidate).
The three saccharide building blocks 1,8 4, and 79 and linker
modified MPEG 2 were used for the assembly of the target
hexasaccharide. The temporary protecting groups 9-fluorenyl-
methoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) and diethylisopropylsilyl (DEIPS)10 of
these building blocks can be cleaved under very mild conditions
without affecting the linker and the Troc protecting group.
Methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) (MW 5000) MPEG was chosen
as the polymeric support to take advantage of its solubility in
many organic solvents. However, the workup procedure involves
precipitation of MPEG by addition of diethyl ether or tert-butyl
methyl ether. Thus, excess of reagents and other side products
can easily be removed by washing of the MPEG precipitate.11
Coupling of 1 with 2 in the presence of NIS/TMSOTf12 gave
formation of immobilized 3 (Scheme 2). Only 1.1 equiv of donor
1 was required to achieve complete conversion of the polymeric
acceptor. No self-condensation of 1 was observed which was
expected due to the much greater reactivity of the benzylic alcohol
of 2 compared to the C-4 hydroxyl of 1. The polymer-bound
monosaccharide 3, bearing a free C-4 hydroxyl, was immediately
used in a subsequent glycosylation without workup and purifica-
tion by precipitation. Thus, addition to the reaction mixture of
another amount of NIS/TMSOTf and galactosyl donor 4 gave,
after standard workup and purification by precipitation, im-
(1) (a) Toshima, K.; Tatsuta, K. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 1503. (b) Boons,
G.-J. Contemp. Org. Synth. 1996, 173. (c) Boons, G.-J. Tetrahedron 1996,
52, 1095.
(2) Gijsen, H. J. M.; Lei, Q.; Fitz, W.; Wong, C. H. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96,
443.
(3) (a) Verduyn, R.; van der Klein, P. A. M.; Douwes, M.; van der Marel,
G. A.; van Boom, J. H. Recl. TraV. Chim. Pays-Bas 1993, 112, 464. (b)
Randolph, J. T.; McClure, K. F.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 5712. (c) Shimizu, H.; Ito, Y.; Kanie, O.; Ogawa, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 1996, 6, 2841. (d) Danishefsky, S. J.; Bilodeau, M. T. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 1380. (e) Rademann, J.; Schmidt, R. R. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 3650. (f) Nicolaou, K. C.; Winssinger, N.; Pastor, J.; DeRoose, F.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 449. (g) Nicolaou, K. C.; Watanabe, N.; Li, J.;
Pastor, J.; Winssinger, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1559. (h) Ito, Y.;
Manabe, S. Curr. Chem. Bio. 1998, 2, 701 and references therein. (i) Andrade,
R. B.; Plante, O. J.; Melean, L. G.; Seeberger, P. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1811.
(j) Osborn, H. M. I., Khan, T. H. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 1807.
(4) Several elegant chemical syntheses of Lewis antigens have been
reported. For examples, see: (a) Sato, S.; Ito, Y.; Ogawa, T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1988, 29, 5267. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Hummel, C. W.; Iwabuchi, Y. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3126. (c) Toepfer, A.; Schmidt, R. R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 5161. (d) Windmuller, R.; Schmidt, R. R. Tetrahedron Lett.
1994, 35, 7927. (e) Yan, L.; Kahne, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9239
and references therein. (f) Deshpande, P. P.; Kim, H. M.; Zatorski, A.; Park,
T.; Ragupathi, G.; Livingston, P. O.; Live, D.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 1600. (g) Kanemitsu, T.; Kanie, O.; Wong, C. H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3415. (h) Ellervik, U.; Magnusson, G. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 9314.
(7) Jobron, L.; Hindsgaul, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5835.
(8) Zhu, T.; Boons, G.-J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 199.
(9) Depre´, D.; Du¨ffels, A.; Green, L. G.; Lenz, R.; Ley, S. V.; Wong, C.
H. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 3326
(10) Toshima, K.; Mukaiyama, S.; Kinoshita, M.; Tatsuta, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1989, 30, 6413.
(11) (a) Douglas, S. P.; Whitfield, D. M.; Krepinsky, J. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 5095. (b) Douglas, S. P.; Whitfield, D. M.; Krepinsky, J. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2116.
(12) (a) Konradsson, P.; Udodong, U. E.; Fraser-Reid, B. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 4313. (b) Veeneman, G. H.; van Leeuwen, S. H.; van Boom, J. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 1331.
(5) Hakomori, S. Acta Anat. 1998, 161, 79.
(6) (a) Windholz, T. B.; Johnston, D. B. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 2555.
(b) Just, G.; Grozinger, K. Synthesis 1976, 457. (c) Zhang, Z.; Ollmann, E.
R.; Ye, X.; Wischnat, R.; Baasov, T.; Wong, C. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 734.
10.1021/ja001930l CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/27/2000