Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 4 of 5
3. For selected examples of γ-functionalization of carbonyl compounds,
overall yield (Scheme 2c). Through a similar strategy, dienol
ether 1a was coupled with propionate 2v and after subse-
quent chemoselective addition of MeLi and acid treatment,
the natural product wine lactone (9) was isolated in 37%
overall yield (Scheme 2d). As a final application, the unpro-
tected broad-spectrum antibiotic chloramphenicol (2w) was
coupled to dienol ether 1k with concomitant elimination to
acrylamide 10 in high overall yield (Scheme 2e).
To conclude, we have developed a robust, general, Cu-
catalyzed technology for γ-alkylation of enones via readily
available dienol ether derivatives and α-halo compounds.
The transformation proceeds in excellent yield, exhibits
complete regiocontrol, tolerates sterically demanding cou-
pling partners, and is highly diastereoselective. This method
enables the synthesis of 1,6-dicarbonyl compounds that have
largely eluded conventional bond formation strategies. The
excellent functional group compatibility of this transfor-
mation ensures broad applicability to a variety of highly func-
tionalized target molecules.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
see: (a) Katzenellenbogen, J. A.; Crumrine, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974,
96, 5662–5663. (b) Bryson, T. A.; Gammill, R. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974,
15, 3963–3966. (c) Fleming, I.; Goldhill, J.; Paterson, I. Tetrahedron Lett.
1979, 20, 3209–3212. (d) Majewski, M.; Mpango, G. B.; Thomas, M. T.;
Wu, A.; Snieckus, V. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 2029–2045. (e) Saito, S.;
Shiozawa, M.; Ito, M.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 813–
814. (f) Terao, Y.; Satoh, T.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 6203–6206. (g) Denmark, S. E.; Beutner, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 7800–7801. (h) Kim, S.; Lim, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 5378–5380. (i) Lee, J. Y.; Kim, S. Synlett 2008, 49–54. (j) Hyde, A.
M.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 177–180. (k) Son, S.;
Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2756–2757. (l) Smith, S. W.; Fu, G.
C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14231–14233. (m) Huang, D. S.; Hartwig,
J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5757–5761. (n) Zultanski, S. L.; Fu,
G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15362–15364. (o) Li, S.; Zhu, R.-Y.;
Xiao, K.-J.; Yu, J.-Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 4317–4321. (p) Liu,
W.-B.; Okamoto, N.; Alexy, E. J.; Hong, A. Y.; Tran, K.; Stoltz, B. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 5234–5237. (q) Fu, L.; Guptill, D. M.; Davies, H. M.
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. ASAP. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b01941. (r) Gurak, J. A.,
Jr.; Yang, K. S.; Liu, Z.; Engle, K. M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. ASAP. DOI:
10.1021/jacs.6b02718. (s) For an alternative β,β-coupling approach, see:
Hu, X.-H.; Zhang, J.; Yang, X.-F.; Xu, Y.-H.; Loh, T.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2015, 137, 3169–3172.
4. (a) Chen, X.; Martinez, J. S.; Mohr, J. T. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 378–381.
(b) Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Mohr, J. T. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 3572–3575. (c) Liu,
X.; Chen, X.; Mohr, J. T. Chem.–Eur. J. 2016, 22, 2274–2277. (d) Chen,
X.; Liu, X.; Mohr, J. T. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 716–719. (e) Chen, X.; Liu, X.;
Martinez, J. S.; Mohr, J. T. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, in press. DOI:
10.1016/j.tet.2016.02.006
5. (a) Liu, C.; Tang, S.; Liu, D.; Yuan, J.; Zheng, L.; Meng, L.; Lei, A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3638–3641. (b) Nishikata, T.; Noda, Y.;
Fujimoto, R.; Sakashita, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16372–16375. (c)
Gietter, A. A. S.; Gildner, P. G.; Cinderella, A. P.; Watson, D. A. Org. Lett.
2014, 16, 3166–3169. (d) Xu, T.; Hu, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54,
1307–1311. (e) Fisher, D. J.; Burnett, G. L.; Velasco, R.; Read de Alaniz, J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 11614–11617.
6. (a) Nagashima, H.; Wakamatsu, H.; Itoh, K.; Tomo, Y.; Tsuji, J. Tet-
rahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 2395–2398. (b) Pirrung, F. O. H.; Steeman, W. J.
M.; Hiemstra, H.; Speckamp, W. N.; Kaptein, B.; Boesten, W. H. J.;
Schoemaker, H. E.; Kamphuis, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5141–5144.
(c) Nagashima, H.; Ozaki, N.; Ishii, M.; Seki, K.; Washiyama, M.; Itoh, K. J.
Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 464–470. For selected reviews featuring Cu-
mediated radical reactions, see: (d) Minisci, F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1975, 8,
165–171. (e) Iqbal, J.; Bhatia, B.; Nayyar, N. K. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 519–
564. (f) Gossage, R. A.; van de Kuil, L. A.; van Koten, G. Acc. Chem. Res.
1998, 31, 423–431. (g) Zhang, C.; Tang, C.; Jiao, N. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012,
41, 3464–3484. (h) Allen, S. E.; Walvoord, R. R.; Padilla-Salinas, R.; Ko-
zlowski, M. C. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 6234–6458. (i) Guo, X.-X.; Gu, D.-
W.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, W. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1622–1651. (j) Anastaski,
A.; Nikolaou, V.; Nurumbetov, G.; Wilson, P.; Kempe, K.; Quinn, J. F.;
Davis, T. P.; Whittaker, M. R.; Haddleton, D.M. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116,
835–877.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
ACS Publications website.
Experimental procedures and characterization data (PDF)
Copies of NMR spectra (PDF)
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
* E-mail: jtmohr@uic.edu
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Funding was provided by the UIC Department of Chemistry.
We thank Profs. Vladimir Gevorgyan, Duncan Wardrop, Tom
Driver, Laura Anderson, Daesung Lee, and Neal Mankad (UIC)
for helpful discussions and use of reagents and equipment.
REFERENCES
1. (a) Stoltz, B. M.; Mohr, J. T. Protonation, Alkylation, Arylation, and
Vinylation of Enolates. In Science of Synthesis; De Vries, J. G., Molander,
G. A., Evans, P. A., Eds.; Thieme: Stuttgart, Germany, 2011; Vol. 3, pp
615–674. (b) MacMillan, D. W. C.; Watson, A. J. B. α-Functionalization of
Carbonyl Compounds. In Science of Synthesis; De Vries, J. G., Molander,
G. A., Evans, P. A., Eds.; Thieme: Stuttgart, Germany, 2011; Vol. 3, pp
675–745. (c) Nguyen, B. N.; Hii, K. K.; Szymanski, W.; Janssen, D. B.
Conjugate Addition Reactions. In Science of Synthesis; De Vries, J. G.,
Molander, G. A., Evans, P. A., Eds.; Thieme: Stuttgart, Germany, 2011;
Vol. 1, pp 571–688.
7. The base is important to overall reactivity, although several bases were
found to be competent. See the Supporting Information for details.
8. The reaction proceeds with lower catalyst loadings but achieving high
yield requires long reaction time. A reaction with 1 mol % Cu(OTf)2 for 48
h delivered 77% yield although conversion was incomplete.
2. The γ-dienolate is lower in energy than the isomeric α-dienolate, see:
Bartmess, J. E.; Kiplinger, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2173–2176.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment