cis-Glycosidic â-mannosides are another class of glyco-
sides commonly found in nature as part of the core region
of N-linked glycoproteins.7 Steric inaccessibility of the â-face
of mannose due to the C2 axial substituent combined with
the anomeric effect favoring the thermodynamically more
stable R-anomer render this type of linkage one of the most
difficult to construct. Several approaches to the synthesis of
â-mannosides have been reported.8 Direct couplings using
mannosyl donors resulted in preferential formation of â-gly-
cosides only under heterogeneous conditions.9 Glycosylations
utilizing an intramolecular tether directly afforded the
â-mannosidic linkage by acceptor delivery to the top face
of the pyranose ring but necessitate multistep synthetic
procedures.10 More recently, conformationally constrained
mannosyl donors have been shown to give high â-selectiv-
ity.11
Initially, the direct formation of â-mannosidic linkages
using a nonconstrained glycosyl donor and different acceptors
was explored. Tetra-O-benzyl mannosyl phosphate 1 served
as donor in glycosylation reactions with monosaccharide
acceptors 5 and 7. Activation of 1 by TMSOTf at -78 °C
resulted in rapid glycosylation of the hindered acceptor 5 to
furnish disaccharide 6. Reaction with primary galactose
acceptor 7 afforded disaccharide 8. The selectivity of the
glycosylation reactions was strongly dependent on two
factors: the nature of the glycosyl acceptor and the solvent
used for the coupling reaction. In dichloromethane, the
desired â-mannoside 6â was preferentially formed (â: R )
3:1). When the less hindered C6 hydroxyl group of galactose
7 served as an acceptor, the R-linked disaccharide 8R was
obtained as the main product (â: R ) 1:1.6). In accordance
with prior results, the configuration of the acceptor moeity
was found to greatly influence the stereochemical outcome
of glycosylation.17
Glycosyl phosphates showed high â-selectivity in glycos-
ylations even when a nonparticipating group was present in
the C2 position.12,13 Encouraged by these findings, we
investigated protocols for the formation of â-mannosidic and
â-2-amino glucosidic linkages employing glycosyl phos-
phates.
A dramatic solvent effect was observed when the reaction
was carried out in acetonitrile.18 The selectivity of the
coupling reaction between donor 1 and acceptor 5 was
completely reversed in acetonitrile as disaccharide 6R was
preferentially obtained (â: R ) 1:5.5) (Table 1). Even for
A set of differentially protected glycosyl phosphates 1-4
(Figure 1) served as glycosylating agents in the coupling
Table 1. Formation of R- and â-Mannosides Using Phosphate
1
Figure 1. Phosphate-based glycosyl donors.
studies.14 These donors were prepared either by reaction of
the corresponding lactol precursors with a chlorophosphate15
or by reaction of dibutyl phosphate with the corresponding
1,2 anhydro sugar.16
the coupling of the less hindered acceptor 7, enhanced
R-selectivity was observed in acetonitrile (â: R ) 1:2.9).19
These experimental results may be rationalized by the initial
formation of either an anomeric R-triflate or a close ion pair
followed by SN2-type displacement by the acceptor nucleo-
phile to yield a â-disaccharide. Crich and co-workers reported
the existence of an R-triflate when glycosyl sulfoxides were
activated by triflic anhydride.17b,c In a participating solvent
such as acetonitrile, either a double displacement of the initial
anomeric triflate may occur or the close ion pair may be
(7) Merritt, J. R.; Naisang, E.; Fraser-Reid, B. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59,
4443.
(8) For a review ,see: Gridley, J. J.; Osborn, H. M. I. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 1471.
(9) Paulsen, H.; Lockhoff, O. Chem. Ber. 1981, 114, 3102.
(10) (a) Barresi, F.; Hindsgaul, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9376.
(b) Stork, G.; Guncheol, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1087.
(11) Crich, D.; Sanxing, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 8321.
(12) Plante, O. J.; Andrade, R. B.; Seeberger, P. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
211.
(13) Hashimoto, S.; Honda, T.; Ikegami, S. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1989, 11, 685.
(14) For the synthesis of 1, see: Sabesan, S.; Niera, S. Carbohydr. Res.
1992, 223, 169. For the synthesis of 2-4, see Supporting Information.
(15) Inagem, M.; Chaki, H.; Kusumoto, S.; Shiba, T. Chem.Lett. 1982,
1281.
(17) (a) Spijker, N. M.; van Boeckel, C. A. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1991, 30, 180. (b) Crich, D.; Sanxing, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 435. (c) Crich, D.; Weiling, C. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4926.
(18) Schmidt, R. R.; Michel, J. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1985, 4, 141.
(19) Wulff, G.; Rohle, G. Angew. Chem. 1974, 86, 173.
(16) Du, Y.; Kong, F. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1995, 14, 341.
3842
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 24, 2000