1102
N.B. MALKAR ET AL.
13C NMR: δ 174 (–COOCH3), 136 (–CH2–CH=CH–CH–
in cyclopentenyl ring), 130 (–CH2–CH=CH–CH– in cy-
clopentenyl ring), 52 (–COOCH3), 46 (–CH2–CH=CH–CH–
in cyclopentenyl ring), 32 (–CH2–CH=CH–CH– in cyclopen-
tenyl ring), 30 (–CH2–CH2–CH=CH–CH– in cyclopentenyl
ring), 37 (–CH–CH2–CH2–), 30 (–CH–CH2–CH2–), 28
(–CH–CH2–CH2–CH2–), 34 (–CH2–COOCH3), 25 (–CH2–
CH2–COOCH3), 28–30 (5C, –CH2–).
Synthesis of threo-2(R/S),3(R/S)-dibromo cyclopentane-
1(R)-methyl undecanoate. A solution of 2-cyclopentene-1(R)-
methyl undecanoate (methyl hydnocarpate, 50 g, 0.19 mmol)
in chloroform (200 mL) was cooled to 0–5°C. A solution of
bromine (33 g, 0.2 mmol) in chloroform (100 mL) was added
dropwise to methyl hydnocarpate solution, until bright yel-
low color of excess bromine appeared. The reaction mixture
was stirred for 3 h at 0–5°C. The excess bromine was
removed by washing the reaction mixture with water. The
chloroform layer was separated and dried over anhydrous
Na2SO4 threo-2(R/S),3(R/S)-dibromo cyclopentane-1(R)-
methyl undecanoate (76 g, 95% yield) was obtained by dis-
tilling off chloroform. The product was then characterized
using FT-IR, NMR, and GC–MS.
ried out on Shimadzu 14A and 14B gas chromatographs using
the following columns: DB-1 (J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA),
capillary column, internal diameter: 0.5 mm; length 30 m and
3% OV-17 liquid phase, adsorbent: Chromosorb WHP,
80–100 mesh (Chrompack, Middelburg, The Netherlands),
packed stainless steel column, 2 mm i.d., 1 ft length, with
flame-ionization detector. Mass spectral studies of the methyl
ester of dimer acid were carried out by Direct Exposure
Probe–Mass Spectroscopy (DEP–MS). The following pro-
gram was used: start at 25 mA current and hold for 30 s; in-
crease at a rate of 1 mA/s to 800 mA and hold for 30 s. Thin-
layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out on Whatman 60
Å Silica Gel precoated TLC plates (2.5 × 5.5 cm in size and
200 µm in thickness; Maidstone, United Kingdom). Prepara-
tive chromatography was carried out on Whatman 60 Å Sil-
ica Gel precoated TLC plates (20 × 20 cm in size and 500 µm
in thickness). Preparative TLC plates were activated before
use by heating them at 120°C for 2 h.
Synthesis of 2-cyclopentene-1(R)-methyl undecanoate
(methyl hydnocarpate). Chaulmoogra oil (200 g) and 5% al-
coholic KOH (2 L) were refluxed for 3 h. After complete hy-
drolysis, the reaction mixture was neutralized with 10% HCl,
and excess ethanol (1.8 L) was distilled off. The reaction mix-
ture was diluted with water (1 L) and then extracted with
hexane (3 × 1 L). The hexane layer was dried over anhydrous
Na2SO4. The chaulmoogra fatty acids (175 g, yield: 92%)
were obtained by distilling hexane completely.
These chaulmoogra fatty acids were then subsequently dis-
solved in methanol (1.5 L), and concentrated H2SO4 (0.1%
vol/vol) was added. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 4 h
and was monitored using TLC. After completion of reaction,
70% of the methanol was distilled off. The reaction mixture
was diluted with water, and crude methyl ester was extracted
in hexane. The hexane layer was washed with water to ensure
complete removal of acid. The organic layer was dried over
anhydrous Na2SO4. The crude methyl ester (179 g, 97%
yield) was obtained after distilling off hexane under vacuum.
The methyl ester was then analyzed by GLC. GLC analysis
showed 50.8% of 2-cyclopentene-1-methyl undecanoate
(methyl hydnocarpate), 10.2% of 13-(2-cyclopentene-1-yl)-
6-methyl tridecenoate (methyl gorlate) and 32.1% of 2-cy-
clopentene-1-methyl tridecanoate (methyl chaulmoograte).
The crude methyl ester was fraction-distilled using a 1-ft
glass column packed with dixon rings using a perkin triangle.
Methyl hydnocarpate (78.7 g, 88% yield) was collected at
144–146°C at 1-mm vacuum. The temperature of the oil bath
was maintained at 230°C. The product was characterized
using FT-IR, NMR, and gas chromatography–mass spectrom-
etry (GC–MS).
1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 3.9–4.9 (m, 2H, J = 5.2, 12 Hz,
–CH(Br)–CH(Br)– in cyclopentane ring), 3.66 (s, 3H,
–COOCH3), 2.30 (t, 2H, –CH2–COOCH3), 2.09 (bs, 1H,
–CHBr-CHBr–CH(–CH2–)–(CH2)10–COOCH3, in cyclopen-
tane ring), 2.03 (m, 4H, –CHBr–CHBr–CH2–CH2–CH–, in
cyclopentane ring), 3.66 (s, 3H, –COOCH3), 1.61 (s, 2H,
–CH2–CH2COOCH–), 1.27 (s, 16H, –CH2–).
13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 174 (–COOCH3), 50, 57, 62, and 66
(–CHBr–CHBr– in cyclopentane ring), 52 (–COOCH3), 43
(–CHBr–CHBr–CH– in cyclopentane ring), 28 (–CH2–
CHBr–CHBr– in cyclopentane ring), 27 (–CH2–CH2–
CHBr–CHBr– in cyclopentane ring), 33 (–CH–CH2–CH2–),
28 (–CH–CH2–CH2–), 27 (–CH–CH2–CH2–CH2–), 34
(–CH2–COOCH3), 25 (–CH2–CH2–COOCH3), 28–30 (5C,
–CH2–).
Synthesis of endo 1,4-bis(methyl undecanoate)-tricyclo
[5,2,1,02,6]deca-4,8-diene via diene intermediate. Threo-
2(R/S),3(R/S)-dibromo cyclopentane-1(R)-methyl undec-
anoate (50 g) was added to 10% alcoholic KOH solution (200
mL) with constant stirring at 60°C. 1,3-Cyclopentadiene-1-
undecanoic acid (diene intermediate) obtained during the re-
action underwent self Diels-Alder reaction to give dimer and
oligomers. The reaction mixture was stirred further for 11 h
and then cooled to 25°C. It was then acidified with 2 N HCl
and diluted with diethylether (200 mL). The stirring was fur-
ther continued for 20 h. The diethylether layer was separated
and further washed with water to ensure complete removal
of acid. This was then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The
orange-yellow product was obtained by distilling off di-
ethylether completely (43 g, 69% yield). The crude dimer and
oligomer acids were esterified using methanol in the presence
of H2SO4 and purified by preparative chromatography. A so-
lution of 100 mg of crude methyl esters of dimer and
oligomer acid dissolved in diethylether (1 mL) was loaded
1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 5.68 (m, 2H, –CH=CH– in cyclopen-
tenyl ring), 2.6 (bs, 1H, –CH=CH–CH–(–CH2–)–(CH2)10–
COOCH3, in cyclopentenyl ring), 2.30 (m, 2H,
–CH=CH–CH2–CH2, in cyclopentenyl ring), 2.02 (m, 2H,
–CH=CH–CH2–CH2–CH–, in cyclopentenyl ring), 3.66 (s,
3H, –COOCH3), 2.30 (t, 2H, –CH2–COOCH3), 1.61 (s, 2H,
C
–CH COOCH ), 1.27 (s, 16H, –C –).
H2
H2
2
3
JAOCS, Vol. 77, no. 10 (2000)