ESI-MS/MS of amino acid betaines
participation of sulfur. Interestingly, the 11 and 12 showed the
ion m/z 60 as an abundant ion leaving ions m/z 58 and 59 absent
or low abundant, as similarly found in 4.
(22) specifically showed [MH–CO2]+ in addition to [MH–NC3H9]+
and m/z 60. The spectra of 21 and 22 also included loss of CO
and CO2 from [MH–NC3H9]+. The [MH–NC3H9–CO2]+ ion showed
further loss of a HCN and CH3CN from 21 and 22, respectively,
by the involvement of the imidazole ring. The arginine betaine
(23) showed abundant [MH–NC3H9]+ and subsequent loss of a
CO2. Direct loss of CO2 from [M+H]+ is also present but low
abundant. Similarly, the expected ion at m/z 60 is also low
abundant. Moreover, the compound 23 showed a specific loss
of 42 u from [MH–NC3H9]+, and the HRMS data confirmed that
the loss of 42 u corresponds to the loss of HN=C=H;NH (42 u)
resulted from the guanidine group. The trimethyllysine (24) shows
the ions at m/z 130, 112, 84 (base peak) and 60 corresponding
to [MH–NC3H9]+, [MH–NC3H9–H2O]+, [MH–NC3H9–(H2O+CO)]+
Aromatic amino acid betaines (13–16)
These betaines are derived from the aromatic amino acids in which
an aromatic group (phenyl, indole or imidazole) is present in the
side chain. The compounds 13 and 14 show the ions at m/z 58,
59 and 60, whereas the compounds 15 and 16 show exclusively
one of them, i.e. m/z 60. Even though a b-hydrogen is absent, the
compound 13 shows the ion at m/z 60, wherein the hydrogen from
phenyl group may be transferred to nitrogen. All the compounds
(13–16) show abundant [MH–NC3H9]+ ion may be because the
resulted product ion is well stabilized by the aromatic ring. The
[MH–NC3H9]+ ion (m/z 135) from 13 further showed a consecutive
loss of two CO molecules to result in ions at m/z 107 and 79
(benzonium cation) because of the presence of a phenyl group in
the side chain. This fragmentation process was confirmed by
multistage mass spectrometric experiments and high-resolution
data. Similar fragmentation is also observed for the [MH–NC3H9]+
ion (m/z 149) from 14, where the loss of CH2CO is seen at m/z 107
because of the presence of Ph–CH2 and further loss of a CO resulted
in a benzonium ion C6H+7 (m/z 79). Additionally, loss of CO2, H2O
and (H2O+CO) is observed from [MH–NC3H9]+ of 14. The CID
spectrum of tyrosine betaine (15) showed similar fragmentation
as that of 14, where the characteristic product ion mass values
are shifted by +16 u because of an extra hydroxyl group attached
on the phenyl group in 15. Similarly, tryptophan betaine (16) showed
[MH–NC3H9]+ ion and subsequent loss of H2O and CH2CO from it.
and [HN(CH3)3]+, respectively. The spectrum of 24 is matching well
[19]
the reported spectrum.
Trimethyllysine (24) is isobaric with
glutamine betaine (20), but both of them show distinctive CID
spectra by which they can be discriminated one from another.
Cyclic amino acid betaines (25–28)
The CID spectra of [M+H]+ from all the cyclic amino acid betaines
(25–28) showed the ion m/z 58 corresponding to [H2C=N(CH3)2]+
as observed in other betaines, but in cyclic betaines, this ion
results through a different fragmentation pathway. The ion at
m/z 102 is consistently present in all the cyclic betaines, whose
elemental composition matching with C4H8NO2, irrespective of
the ring size and substituent on the ring. It suggests that all the
cyclic betaines result in a common structure keeping nitrogen
and –COOH functionality intact. Therefore, the ion m/z 102 might
be formed by the loss of C3H6, C3H6O, C2H4S and C4H8 from the
[M+H]+ ion of 25, 26, 27 and 28, respectively. Besides, all the
cyclic amino acid betaines showed [MH–HCOOH]+ ion.
Acidic amino acid betaines (17 and 18)
The CID spectrum of aspartic acid betaine (17) is similar to that of
2 containing the major product ions m/z 58 and 59, but the
spectrum of 17 shows additional low abundant ions (<1%)
corresponding to the loss of H2O, HCOOH and (NC3H9+H2O) from
[M+H]+ ion because of the presence of an additional –COOH
group. The glutamic acid betaine (18), which consists of an extra
methylene group compared with 17, showed the ion at m/z 60 as
the base peak leaving m/z 58 and 59 as low abundant ions. The
spectrum of 18 also showed [MH–H2O]+, [MH–NC3H9]+ and loss
of H2O, CO and HCOOH from [MH–NC3H9]+.
The proline betaine (25) showed an abundant product ion at
m/z 84 as reported by Wood et al. They proposed that this ion
was formed by the loss of (C3H6+H2O) from the [M+H]+ ion but
not supported by HRMS and MS/MS data. In the present study,
however, the high-resolution data showed two peaks for the
ion m/z 84, i.e. 84.0817 (99%) and 84.0446 (1%), where the
elemental composition of the dominant ion matches to the loss
of C2H4O2 (probably CH3COOH) from [M+H]+ and that of low
abundant ion with the loss of (C3H6+H2O) from [M+H]+. The
MS/MS of m/z 102 from 25 showed only m/z 84.0446 as one of
the product ion but not m/z 84.0817, which confirms that
84.0817 is not resulting from m/z 102. The precursor ion
spectrum of the ion m/z 84 showed m/z 144 (protonated
molecule) as the major precursor, which confirms that the ion
at m/z 84 is forming directly from the [M+H]+ ion by the loss of
C2H4O2. Wood et al. showed that the ion at m/z 84 was shifted
to m/z 90 in the d6-proline betaine that can only be explained
retaining two methyl groups on nitrogen intact. It is difficult to
understand the actual mechanism involved for the formation of
m/z 84 from 25; however, a plausible mechanism is shown in
Scheme 4. In addition, the ions m/z 72 and 70 corresponding to
the loss of (CH2=CH–COOH) and (HCOOH+C2H4) from the [M
+H]+ ion, respectively, are also observed for 25. Hydroxyproline
betaine (26) is a hydroxy derivative of proline betaine (25);
consequently, the characteristic product ions found in 25 are
shifted by +16 u in 26. The typical ion m/z 84 in 25 is shifted to
m/z 100 in 26, which further confirms the loss of (C2H4O2) from
[M+H]+. The [MH–(CH2=CH–COOH)]+ ion (m/z 88) is found to be
the dominant ion in 26.
Amidic and basic amino acid-derived betaines (19–24)
The carboxyl group on b-carbon in 17 is changed to amide group
in 19; hence, the spectrum of 19 showed dominant loss of NH3
from [M+H]+ as similar to the H2O loss found in 17. In addition,
the spectrum of 19 showed H2O loss also because of the
presence of a –COOH group as well. A specific loss of CO2 is
found from the [M+H]+ ion 19, and the loss of CO2 is also found
from [MH–NC3H9]+ ion. Interestingly, the ion at m/z 60 is also
abundant in 19, but it is absent in 17. The specific behavior of
19 when compared with 17 demonstrates a special role of
amide group in 19. Addition of an extra methyl group in the
glutamine betaine (20) changed the overall fragmentation. The
compound 20 showed a low abundant [MH–NH3]+ and a
dominant [MH–NC3H9]+ along with abundant ion at m/z 60. The
[MH–NC3H9]+ ion from 20 further resulted in characteristic
fragments corresponding to the loss of CO, HCONH2 and HCOOH.
Like in 19, the histidine betaine (21) and its N-methyl derivative
J. Mass. Spectrom. 2012, 47, 79–88
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jms