586
D.A. Chen et al. / Surface Science 604 (2010) 574–587
surface showed no activity for DMMP decomposition beyond what
was observed before oxidation. Apparently it is more difficult to re-
move phosphorus by oxidation from the ceria surface than from a
titania surface.
methoxys and decreased in yield with increasing DMMP exposure.
Interestingly, no dimethyl ether was formed in the reaction of
methanol itself, which also decomposes on ceria via a methoxy
intermediate. Diffuse reflectance infrared spectroscopy studies
showed that DMMP decomposition at room temperature produced
surface methoxy, and two different binding sites were identified
based on the CAO stretch for methoxy: the on top site at
1098 cmÀ1 and 2-fold site at 1047 cmÀ1 [56,67]. However, it should
4.3. Comparison with methanol reaction on ceria: common methoxy
intermediate
The similarities in the chemistry of methanol and DMMP on cer-
ia thin films provides evidence that DMMP decomposition occurs
via a methoxy intermediate. Methoxy was identified by high reso-
lution XPS studies as the only surface intermediate in methanol
reaction on CeO2 films grown on Ru(0 0 0 1) [19]. For both DMMP
and methanol reaction on the ceria thin films, formaldehyde and
methanol desorb at ꢀ560–575 K as the major products, and meth-
oxy was proposed to disproportionate to form methanol and form-
aldehyde. Moreover, multiple adsorption-reaction cycles for
DMMP or methanol resulted in reduction of the ceria. For reaction
on Ce18O2, both 18O- and 16O-formaldehyde were observed at 560–
575 K.
In the case of methanol reaction, it is proposed that the meth-
oxy intermediate can undergo methyl hopping so that only some
of the formaldehyde contains lattice oxygen. This may also occur
when methoxy is formed from DMMP reaction although it is pos-
sible that lattice oxygen incorporation occurs due to bidentate
adsorption of methoxy to form a dioxymethylene intermediate
via coordination with lattice oxygen. On crystalline ceria thin films
grown in UHV on Cu(1 1 1), methanol reaction on the ceria film
produced methoxy at 550 K, which was identified by infrared spec-
troscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy [41]; formalde-
hyde was produced from methanol reaction, but CO and H2 were
observed as the primary products, unlike on the CeO2 films on
Ru(0 0 0 1). However, since CO and H2 are major products formed
from methanol reaction on reduced ceria films [19], the difference
in chemistry may be related to the oxidation state of the ceria films
on Cu(1 1 1).
be noted that these two modes overlap with the ms(OAPAO) stretch
expected around 1058–1085 cmÀ1 [30,31,33]. The lower frequency
for CAO stretch for the bridging species compared to the value on
pure ceria was explained by methoxy at a bridge site between cer-
ium and aluminum ions [56].
5. Summary
DMMP readily decomposes on crystalline ceria thin films upon
heating the surface. The main gaseous products are formaldehyde,
methanol, water and CO, with POx remaining on the surface after
heating to 900 K. The ceria films are capable of sustaining decom-
position activity after multiple cycles of adsorption and reaction,
but the activity significantly diminishes with each cycle. This loss
of activity is attributed to passivation of active sites by POx and also
corresponds to reduction of Ce+4 to Ce+3; even after reoxidation of
the ceria, the activity is not restored, indicating that DMMP decom-
position on ceria is not catalytic. At 100 K, DMMP initially adsorbs
to the surface via the phosphoryl oxygen, but the P@O bond con-
verts to a bridging OAPAO species at 200 K. Upon further heating,
DMMP decomposes via PAOCH3 bond scission, forming MMP and
MP surface intermediates as well as surface methoxy. The more
stable PACH3 bond is not cleaved until temperatures above
700 K. DMMP reaction on reduced ceria films is similar to that on
the stoichiometric films although more H2 and less high tempera-
ture formaldehyde are produced on the reduced surface.
Acknowledgements
The main difference between methanol and DMMP reaction is
the presence of surface hydroxyls from OAH bond scission in
methanol. These hydroxyls give rise to water desorption at 200 K
from methanol reaction, whereas water desorption in DMMP reac-
tion is not observed below 800 K because CAH bonds are not bro-
ken below this temperature. Furthermore, formaldehyde
production from methanol reaction is not observed above 800 K;
this is in agreement with the high temperature formaldehyde orig-
inating from PACH3 bond scission during DMMP decomposition to
form a transient methoxy intermediate with lattice oxygen.
Methanol [19] and DMMP reactions are also similar on the re-
duced ceria films. Both reactions produce CO and H2, in addition
to the formaldehyde and water observed on the stoichiometric sur-
face. For methanol reaction, the H2 yield increases while the H2O
yield decreases for more highly reduced surfaces, as expected
due to deficiency of oxygen in the reduced films. Furthermore,
the temperature of formaldehyde and methanol desorption shifts
from 560 to 575 K to ꢀ630 K for both DMMP and methanol reac-
tion on the reduced surface. It is proposed that the greater number
of oxygen vacancies on the reduced surface stabilize methoxy and
OH since it becomes harder to remove lattice oxygen as water [19].
An earlier study of DMMP decomposition on powdered ceria
further supports methoxy as a surface intermediate although the
product distribution is not identical to that on ceria thin films.
Work from the Mitchell group involving DMMP decomposition
on ceria supported on alumina reports that methanol and dimethyl
ether are the primary products formed via a methoxy intermediate
[56]. In these studies, it was established that most of the observed
activity is from reaction on ceria rather than alumina. The dimethyl
ether was proposed to be formed from combination of two surface
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the US Army
Research Office (W911NF-05-1-0184). D.R.M., W.O.G. and S.D.S. are
supported by the Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and
Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, US Department of En-
ergy, under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with Oak Ridge Na-
tional Laboratory, managed and operated by UT-Battelle, LLC. Use
of the National Synchrotron Light Source, Brookhaven National
Laboratory, was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office
of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-
AC02-98CH10886.
References
[1] X. Guo, J. Yoshinobu, J.T. Yates, J. Phys. Chem. 94 (1990) 6839.
[2] T.Z. Tzou, S.W. Weller, J. Catal. 146 (1994) 370.
[3] J.G. Ekerdt, K.J. Klabunde, J.R. Shapley, J.M. White, J.T. Yates, J. Phys. Chem. 92
(1988) 6182.
[4] V.S. Smentkowski, P. Hagans, J.T. Yates, J. Phys. Chem. 92 (1988) 6351.
[5] M.A. Henderson, J.M. White, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110 (1988) 6939.
[6] Y.X. Li, O. Koper, M. Atteya, K.J. Klabunde, Chem. Mat. 4 (1992) 323.
[7] Y.X. Li, K.J. Klabunde, Langmuir 7 (1991) 1388.
[8] G.W. Wagner, P.W. Bartram, O. Koper, K.J. Klabunde, J. Phys. Chem. B 103
(1999) 3225.
[9] S.R. Segal, L.X. Cao, S.L. Suib, X. Tang, S. Satyapal, J. Catal. 198 (2001) 66.
[10] O. Koper, E. Lucas, K.J. Klabunde, J. Appl. Toxicol. 19 (1999) S59.
[11] M.A. Henderson, T. Jin, J.M. White, J. Phys. Chem. 90 (1986) 4607.
[12] C.S. Kim, R.J. Lad, C.P. Tripp, Sensors Actuat. 76 (2001) 442.
[13] L. Cao, S.R. Segal, S.L. Suib, X. Tang, S. Satyapal, J. Catal. 194 (2000) 61.
[14] M.B. Mitchell, V.N. Sheinker, A.B. Tesfamichael, E.N. Gatimu, M. Nunley, J. Phys.
Chem. B 107 (2003) 580.
[15] J.S. Ratliff, S.A. Tenney, X. Hu, S.F. Conner, S. Ma, D.A. Chen, Langmuir 25 (2009)
216.
[16] A. Trovarelli, Catal. Rev.– Sci. Eng. 38 (1996) 439.