Page 3 of 5
ChemComm
DOI: 10.1039/C4CC06747A
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), 2 (0.5 mmol), 3a (0.5 mmol),
In summary, various 1,3ꢀ and 1,3,4ꢀsubstituted pyrazoles
were efficiently synthesized via copperꢀcatalyzed assembly of
40 oxime acetates, aniline and paraformaldehyde. This process
involved copperꢀcatalyzed NꢀO bond cleavage, CꢀC/CꢀN/NꢀN
bond formations and oxidative dehydrogenation. In addition, this
protocol utilized the oxime acetate as the internal oxidant to
initiate the reaction and the green oxygen to end up the
45 transformation. Detailed mechanistic studies showed that this
transformation went through two processes, which included the
formation of pyrazoline ring and oxidative dehydrogenation
under the Cu/O2 system. The oxidant of the first process was
oxime acetate and the following was O2, which could be called
50 oxidation relay. Further study on this topic is currently
undergoing in our laboratory.
Cs2CO3 (20 mol %), CuBr (10 mol %), DMSO (3.0 mL), under air, 120
oC for 12 h. Isolated yields.
5
To gain more insight into the mechanism of the process, we
conducted several control experiments. When we coupled
compound 9 with paraformaldehyde 3a in the standard conditions,
we could not obtain product 8 [Eq. (1)]. This result revealed that
9 was not an intermediate in the transformation.15 Moreover,
10 when we took our standard reaction under N2, 7 was formed in
70% GC yield,16 and the yield of 8 was low [Eq. (2)]. When
increasing the amount of Cs2CO3, the yield of product 8 was
trace.17 However, when we made the standard reaction continue
under air after 1 h, pyrazoline 7 was completely transformed into
15 product 8, which indicated that 8 should come from 7 by
oxydehydrogenation under the Cu/O2 system.18
The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (21172076 and 21202046), the National Basic Research
55 Program of China (973 Program) (2011CB808600), and the
Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (10351064101000000)
and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
(2014ZP0004 and 2014ZZ0046) for financial support.
Notes and references
60 School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South China University
of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China. Fax: +86 20-87112906; Tel:
+86 20-87112906; E-mail: jianghf@scut.edu.cn
† Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Experimental
section, characterization of all compounds, copies of 1H and 13C NMR
65 spectra for selected compounds. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
20
On the basis of these experiments and previous reports,10ꢀ14
a
plausible mechanism is illustrated in Scheme 1. Firstly,
acetophenone oxime acetate 1 was smoothly transferred to copper
enamide intermediate 2 with copper catalyst and produced
another CuII species.10ꢀ13 Subsequently, imine intermediate 3 was
1 (a) C. Li, Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 355. (b) A. S. Girard, T. Knauber,
C. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 74. (c) C. S. Yeung, V. M.
Dong, Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1215. (d) S. Zhang, F. Zhang, Y. Tu,
25 formed via nucleophilic addition of 2 to paraformaldehyde.10b
Imine intermediate 3 was coupled with aniline, followed by the
coordination with copper catalyst to give intermediate 4. Then,
intermediate 5 was formed by losing one molecule of H2O.14a,b
With the release of H+, intermediate 5 was converted to
30 intermediate 6,14a,b which underwent reductive elimination to
afford pyrazoline 7 and copper(0).14 Finally, copper(0) was
oxidized by copper(II) to form copper(I) and product 8 was
obtained by oxidative dehydrogenation process under the Cu/O2
system.18
70
75
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 1937. (e) A. Corma, H. García, Chem.
Rev. 2002, 102, 3837. (f) C. Liu, H. Zhang, W. Shi, A. Lei, Chem.
Rev. 2011, 111, 1780. (g) T. W. Lyons, M. S. Sanford, Chem. Rev.
2010, 110, 1147. (h) A. A. O. Sarhanw, C. Bolm, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2009, 38, 2730. (i) C. Sun, B. Li, Z. Shi, Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1293.
(j) X. Chen, K. M. Engle, D. Wang, J. Yu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 5094.
2
(a) W. Wu, H. Jiang, Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 1736. (b) Z. Shi, C.
Zhang, C. Tang, N. Jiao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 3381. (c) L.
Boisvert, K. Goldberg, Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 899. (d) A. N.
Campbell, S. S. Stahl, Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 851. (e) T.
Punniyamurthy, S. Velusamy, J. Iqbal, Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2329.
(f) Z. Shi, S. Ding, Y. Cui, N. Jiao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
7895. (g) L. Zhang, X. Bi, X. Guan, Xi. Li, Q. Liu, B. Barry, P. Liao,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 11303. (h) K. B. Urkalan, M. S.
Sigman, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3146. (i) T. Mitsudome, T.
Umetani, N. Nosaka, K. Mori, T. Mizugaki, K. Ebitani, K. Kaneda,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 481. (j) H. Sundén, M. Engqvist, J.
Casas, I. Ibrahem, A. Córdova, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6532.
For recent selected examples of Rhꢀcatalyzed using NꢀO bond as an
internal oxidant, see: (a) N. Guimond, S. I. Gorelsky, K. Fagnou, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6449. (b) L. Xu, Q. Zhu, G. Huang, B.
Cheng, Y. Xia, J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 3017. (c) P. C. Too, Y. Wang,
S. Chiba, Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5688. (d) P. C. Too, S. H. Chua, S. H.
Wong, S. Chiba, J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 6159. (e) N. Guimond, C.
Gouliaras, K. Fagnou, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 6908. (f) S.
Rakshit, C. Grohmann, T. Besset, F. Glorius, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011,
133, 2350. (g) J. M. Neely, T. Rovis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136,
2735. (h) J. M. Neely, T. Rovis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 66.
For recent selected examples of Pdꢀcatalyzed using NꢀO bond as an
internal oxidant, see: (a) J. Wu, X. Cui, L. Chen, G. Jiang, Y. Wu, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13888. (b) W. P. Hong, A. V. Iosub, S. S.
80
35
OAc
N
Ph
1
CuII
Cu0
2 CuI
85
CuII
HN
Ph
[O]
N
CuII
N
N
NPh
Ph
Ph
8
7
Ph
2
3
CuII
(CH2O)n
90
N
NPh
Ph
6
NH OCuII
H+
Ph
CuII
95
3
NH NPh
CuIIOH
NHPh
Ph
PhNH2
5
NH
4
H2O
Ph
100
4
Scheme 1 Possible reaction mechanism.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry [year]
Journal Name, [year], [vol], 00–00 |
3